Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Two-hour commute between Joburg and Pretoria on its way – Sanral

Road agency’s funding problem hits planned route developments.

Already fed up with the commute between Joburg and Pretoria just three years after the official launch of e-tolls?

Well, things are going to get a whole lot worse unless the SA National Roads Agency (Sanral) solves its funding problem caused by the widespread e-tolls boycott, the agency says.

It took just 30 minutes to drive from Pretoria to Joburg during peak traffic when the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP) was completed in 2011, though e-tolling was only launched in December 2013.

“Based on the growth in the number of cars on the route, we expect the commute from Pretoria to Joburg to take two hours during peak hours,” says Alex van Niekerk, Sanral’s project manager for GFIP.

The same commute currently takes about an hour in busy traffic.

The Gauteng car pool has grown by 1 million vehicles to 4.2 million since 2009. The car pool for the whole of SA has grown to 10.7 million from 4.9 million in 1994, and is expected to reach 16 million in 2030.

A two-hour commute – if this is correct – would represent a huge drain on the economy in terms of lost production and extra fuel consumption. 

“My feeling is that when Sanral makes statements like this, it is an indirect threat or sanction against the people, which basically says, accept e-tolls or live with congestion,” says Wayne Duvenage, chairman of Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa). “They refuse to accept the alternatives and hide behind government decisions, when, in fact, they advised government on the defunct e-toll scheme. They cannot now sit back and watch the congestion grow. They have to act and find solutions to their impasse.”

The e-tolls boycott has hit Sanral’s funding for planned route developments which would alleviate congestion on the Joburg-Pretoria highway. These routes include the PW9 as a parallel route to the Ben Schoeman highway; a ring road around Pretoria to ease traffic congestion in the east of the city and provide better access to the western suburbs; a route connecting Soweto to Midrand; and the planned PWV14 route which is intended to route traffic away from the often-gridlocked Gilooly’s interchange to the east of Johannesburg. 

Van Niekerk says these projects have been delayed by the e-tolls boycott, which has hit Sanral’s revenue collection. According to figures reported to parliament, 2.9 million Gauteng freeway users have outstanding debts to Sanral. The total outstanding debt is R7.2 billion according to the 2016 annual report.

Then there is the practical difficulty of collecting outstanding debts of close to R7 billion, which Gauteng motorists could not sustain without serious damage to the provincial economy. Sanral has issued more than 6 000 summonses in an effort to collect outstanding debts, and van Niekerk says further summons will be issued. As previously reported in Moneyweb, Sanral faces a prescription problem commencing in December this year, as in terms of the Prescription Act  it will have difficulty claiming debts older than three years. It might attempt to criminalise defaulters through the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (Aarto) Act, but this will almost certainly be challenged in the Constitutional Court.

Outa has challenged Sanral’s refusal to write off large parts of its overdue debt, some of which is nearly three years old and therefore well past the generally accepted accounting standards for debt write-off (which should be expensed through the income statement). Instead, Sanral is counting this debt as an asset on its balance sheet, which was signed off by the Auditor-General.

Sanral offered motorists a 60% discount on outstanding bills, but the response to this was miserable. Outa reckons collections are running at between R50 million and R70 million a month, which is a fraction of where they need to be.

In practical terms, e-toll boycotts have shifted Sanral’s funding burden back to government, which provides guarantees allowing the state-owned company to raise borrowings on the bond market.

Given the mess the e-tolls boycott has generated, would it not have been better to impose a 9c a litre fuel levy as Outa suggested? Had Sanral done this, the Gauteng Freeways would theoretically have been paid off by now.

Van Niekerk says Sanral is bound by government’s commitment to the user-pay principle (ie. tolling) and there are costs associated with ring-fencing a portion of the fuel levy for a particular highway project. “Given all the routes that have to be built around the country, we would end up with a multitude of ring-fenced portions of the fuel levy which would render it uncontrollable.”

National Treasury is in any event against ring-fencing, while a 9c a litre fuel levy would not provide for future maintenance, says van Niekerk. Additionally, motorists elsewhere in the country may object to paying for Gauteng roads they do not frequently use.

Duvenage replies: “Gauteng generates close of 40% of the GDP of SA, and is paying for roads elsewhere in the country through its tax contributions. The argument that a fuel levy would prejudice motorists elsewhere does not hold water.”

Duvenage says there is almost no chance of Sanral recovering its outstanding debts, as there are insurmountable legal and practical aspects to the recovery of its debt. A high court legal test case between Outa and Sanral is looming, but the matter is unlikely to be resolved any time soon.

Van Niekerk says similar tolling programmes have succeeded in other developing countries, and cites Chile as an example, where 93% of motorists pay their bills.

Sanral’s ‘misleading’ financial statements

In a statement released on Wednesday, Outa says Sanral has misled the Standing Committee on Public Accounts (Scopa) by failing to write off overdue debt, which is now approaching R9 billion.

In response to questions put to it by Scopa over its accounting for outstanding debt, Sanral’s chief financial officer Inge Mulder said the law does not allow it to write off such debts, and the organisation would endeavour to collect this money. Mulder added that Sanral’s reporting was within the International Finance Resorting Standards (IFRS), when reflecting the substantial re-valuation of their road assets in 2010. 

Outa says it is disingenuous for Sanral to announce IFRS as their financial reporting guide on asset valuations on the one hand, and then to disregard those same standards when it comes to reflecting their unrecoverable debt from the outstanding e-toll situation on the other hand.

“When questioned on what Sanral believed was the likelihood of collecting this debt by Mr Brauteseth, Sanral’s management failed to answer the question and instead, Sanral’s chairperson, Mr Roshan, proceeded to indicate that their e-toll income levels had achieved a slight rise in recent months,” said Outa in a statement.  

Oops! We could not locate your form.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   15

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

After the next election in 2 years time and once we have a new and hopefully a more honest President, and once the ANC have lost their majority power, the then ruling party or coalition will resolve the Sanral issues by using the money properly thus eliminating the need for eTolls. What is claimed in this article is scaremongering from Sanral and the ruling party because they have realized there is less in the cookie jar to share amongst the ‘comrades’.

Government does not have a blanket ‘user pay’ policy.

In fact, the government’s own 2014 review of SOEs recommended less reliance on ‘user pay’ for social infrastructure such as roads.

Nazir Alli’s dearest wish was to build an empire. And to do that, he needed a revenue stream, which is why tolling was always the go-to solution for roads funding, with attempts to justify it coming after the fact – the farsical 2010 EIA from UCT springs to mind. Tolling was never the preferred solution arising from an impartial examination of alternatives, which is why SANRAL has always been forced to resort to illegal methods to implement it.

Now the end of the rope is unravelling. With Alli’s departure, Alex van Niekerk has become the stalking horse for tolling, ignoring the fact that a national roads fund, funded by fuel levies, was proposed more than two decades ago. That idea was shot down by Nazir Alli when he and Mac Maharaj put SANRAL together in the 1990s.

And if Treasury is opposed to ring-fencing (and if it is impractical), then why does the fuel price consist of, among other things, almost 20 individually ring-fenced items, the most notable of which is the RAF levy?

Yes, I rememeber now how they fibbed us about the ring fencing part. Liars that only know about creactive accounting.

typical, making their problem our problem. STOP STEALING, SQUANDERING

Scamral was NOT honest from the start and the people running and the consortiums backing the scheme were all suspect. If it looks like a rat, behaves like a rat and smells like a rat; it must be a rat. This I how I view the etolls debacle; and I don’t feel an once of guilt not paying for this.

We live in a country where public transport was never a high priority.

SA needs to get it’s sh$3 in order, because that is what separates us from the rest of BRICS – NO RELIABLE PUBLIC TRANSPORT!

I wonder now much of that 9 cents per litre fuel levy would have found its way into actually improving roads in Gauteng (or anywhere else for tat matter). When you have a crook in charge of the country and he refuses to move aside, is it any wonder that large-scale corruption is the order of the day?

Agreed that a fuel levy would not go mostly to actual roads improvement – but how much of the current collection system goes to this? Also considering that the effectiveness of this collection is poor.

According to a Treasury document in my possession:

Capital cost of the freeway improvements: R22bn
Capital and operating costs of the tolling system over 22 years: R22bn
Capital and operating costs of the VPC over 22 years: R11bn

Total: R55bn
Cost of tolling infrastructure: R33bn

So to answer your question, 60c of every toll Rand paid goes to the collection system.

Even the best-run systems in the world don’t get below a collection cost of 7%.

Whereas the collection cost of the fuel levy is, for all practical purposes, nil.

Tolling will never gain any public traction until government can explain why it claims taxpayers “cannot afford” a fractional tax increase to fund roads but CAN afford the kind of absurd cost bloat that is a baked-in feature of road tolling.

For a new “freeway” [oximoron!] I would expect the travel time between Joburg and Pretoria to be less than it was before the “expensiveways”, certainly NOT 2 hours.

Bobsmith, the only priority of the anc gutterment is to stink and steal

I’d rather pay my OUTA (Organization Undoing Tax Abuse) membership than SANRAL. Upping the fuel levy would’ve resolved current issues, but no, you pay a foreign 1st world company a fortune to implement and run this scam just to get a fraction of the tax income to fund infrastructure projects in a 3rd world country. It’s a disgrace. Now, as is the case with Eskom you have the bloody nerve to try and keep users of the roads hostage with threats of long commutes. Instead of using technology as an enabler, you are using it as a form of abuse. So here is a big middle finger to SANRAL. You will not get a bloody cent from me – EVER !!!!! You are not part of the solution, but part of the bigger problem.

Alex nie van die kerk nie – remember him? He was the master architect for enatis, another anc sponsored rip off. Then you also get dearest old vusi ek ken nie lieg nie – fibbing in the press that everyone is paying etoll except for a few hardegatte like me. Now scamral is telling us that we are going to travel for 2 hours between Jhb and Pta – based on what, the colour of their toilet paper used this morning? Scamral do you really think I believe you based on your history of lies and deceit? Funny, like a spasm in death, scamral chiefs every now and then have to made a public statement.

Does Sanral think everybody can be bought with KFC a Tshirt and a bottle of booze like Zuma followers.
First step:
1. Govt. must stop looting tax money
2. Place a levy on fuel and ensure the funds are used for roads
3. Up the annual licence fee on vehicles especially heavy vehicles- again make sure money is correctly allocated and not looted
4. Make the railway more efficient as it was pre 1994 ( 80% + of freight was transported in this manner – now less than 30% ) make railway staff accountable for theft and delays

Load All 15 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
Insider GOLD
ONLY R63pm

Moneyweb's premium subscription is a membership service which will give you access to a number of tools to take charge of your investments.
Or choose a yearly subscription at R630pa - SAVE R126

Get instant access to all our tools and content. Monthly subscription can be suspended at any time.

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOLS TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: