Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

What SAA’s ‘business rescue’ means

If the business rescue practitioner finds there is no reasonable chance a rescue plan can succeed, he files a petition for liquidation.

Plagued by debt and years of mismanagement, state-owned South African Airways (SAA) has been placed into business rescue – South Africa‘s bankruptcy protection process – in a last-ditch attempt to save the national carrier.

South Africa‘s business rescue process, which will shield SAA from the demands of its creditors while an independent advisor takes over, borrows from US, UK, Canadian and Australian law.

But business rescue is uniquely South African in terms of its time tables, ranking of preference among stakeholders and the involvement of labour.

Here are the key aspects of the process:

Next steps

Under a voluntary business rescue, a restructuring expert known as a business rescue practitioner is appointed by the board to take over management of the distressed company. His job is to salvage the business or at least deliver a better return to creditors than a formal liquidation.

The business rescue practitioner must quickly assess the company’s operations and, within 10 business days, convene creditors and employees to give a view on whether there is a reasonable chance a rescue plan can succeed.

If he deems there is hope, he is required to present a business rescue plan within 25 days of his appointment.

That could include restructuring the business, its property and its debts. Company assets might be sold. Or the business rescue practitioner could simply map out an orderly winding down of the company.

The business rescue plan must be voted on and adopted by the affected parties, which include creditors but also employees.

If the business rescue practitioner finds there is no reasonable chance a rescue plan can succeed, he files a petition for liquidation.

Labour

South Africa‘s strong labour laws extend to business rescue. Employees continue to work for the company on the same terms and conditions and must be consulted throughout the process.

Any changes to workers’ employment, including layoffs or salary and benefit cuts, must be agreed between the company and employees in accordance with labour laws.

Business rescue leaves workers in a better position than a liquidation under which contracts are suspended and claims for salaries and retirement benefits are capped.

The pecking order

Company employees also sit near the top in the order of preference for the payment of claims.

They rank just below the business rescue practitioner’s own remuneration and the costs of the process.

Then come lenders with secured claims dating from before the process began, followed by creditors who provided financing or services after the company was placed in business rescue.

Last in line are legacy creditors whose unsecured claims pre-date the process.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.

COMMENTS   4

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

Lenders and creditors will be crazy to vote in favour of any rescue plan.

After the Practitioner and Labour have been paid they will get nothing. Its just a con.

Wrap it up ASAP and cap costs to them and they will get more.

it means that

The BRP get rich at R2000ph maxR25 000 per DAY + expenses.
The incompetent fatcat directors and board still get their obscene salaries.
The parasitic politicians and friens can still fly for free.
The poor goes hungry and Eskom sinks further

until the not bailout R4billion taxpayers money is finished after which a next not bailout follows.
The business eventually sinks and is not rescued.

I agree regarding “the poor”, but wanted to add that SAA (the state) can re-allocate money that was originally meant for the social upliftment of the poor & destitute, to prop up SAA (and Eskom)instead.

The majority poor voted for ANC with the last election, so this must be the type of leadership the poor desires.
(Methinks it’s also now time also to cut the SASSA grants to prop up SAA, Eskom. Best way to learn is to feel the pain. Sad but true 🙁 The workers must stop blaming the ANC-leadership of SAA….WHO voted such leadership into power?

Load All 4 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
Insider GOLD
ONLY R63pm

Moneyweb's premium subscription is a membership service which will give you access to a number of tools to take charge of your investments.
Choose a yearly subscription at R630pa - SAVE R126

Get instant access to all our tools and content. Monthly subscription can be cancelled at any time.

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOL TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: