You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

Government rejects Sarb Amendment Bill

The amendments would make it easier to capture the central bank: Treasury
The proposed changes could send a “powerful negative signal” to investors on the future of the rand and SA's monetary policy, according to Treasury director general Ismail Momoniat. Image: Moneyweb

National Treasury has warned that nationalisation of the SA Reserve Bank (Sarb) could expose the central bank to corruption or capture similar to that experienced by some state-owned enterprises.

The proposed amendments do not strictly call for a change in the mandate of the bank, but Treasury director general Ismail Momoniat says should the amendments be adopted by Parliament, it would create a perception that the central bank’s independence could be in jeopardy in the future

Moneyweb Insider INSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full access to all our share and unit trust data tools, our award-winning articles, and support quality journalism in the process.

Choose an option:

R63 per month
R630 per year SAVE R126

You will be redirected to a checkout page.
To view all features and options, click here.

A monthly subscription is charged pro rata, based on the day of purchase. This is non-refundable and includes a R5 once-off sign-up fee.
A yearly subscription is refundable within 14 days of purchase and includes a 365-day membership.

Click here for more information.

He told Parliament’s standing committee on finance on Wednesday that the government is “fundamentally opposed” to amending the Sarb Act because of its potential impact on the future investment prospects in the country and the potential conflict with other financial legislation. The proposed amendments also do not align with government’s current policy and funding priorities, he said.

EFF leader Julius Malema initially introduced a private member’s Bill to amend sections of the Sarb Act in 2018. The proposed amendments would allow for the state to have sole ownership of the bank, and give the minister of finance extended powers to appoint auditors and directors of the bank as well as the power to make regulations relating to the appointment of directors.

Seven of the Sarb’s directors are appointed by an independent panel while the governor, three deputy governors and four directors are appointed by the president.

The bank currently has some 650 domestic and international private shareholders. The Act prohibits shareholders from holding more than 10 000 shares of the total number of two million issued shares; there are no other limitations on shareholding.

Should the Bill be adopted by Parliament, the shareholders would be entitled to compensation from the government which would be required to buy out the shareholders.

Foreign shareholders are protected under various bilateral investment treaties and buying them out under the country’s “fragile fisus” would not be prudent, Momoniat said.

The central bank is constitutionally mandated to protect the value of the currency in the “interest of balanced and sustainable growth,”and to do so without “without fear, favour or prejudice.”

In a presentation to Parliament, Momoniat said the amendments could send a “powerful negative signal” to investors on the future of the currency and monetary policy in the country.

The amendments could also generate fears among investors about expropriation and more uncertainty on property rights beyond land ownership, he said.

Avoiding state capture

Many of South Africa’s state-owned enterprises including South African Airways, Denel and Eskom have been implicated in allegations of looting and corruption by various witnesses at the ongoing State Capture Commission of Inquiry. The government has on several occasions been required to search its piggy bank to find funds to bail out these companies, which have suffered massive losses as a result of the alleged capture.

Momoniat told Parliament that the proposed amendments to the ownership structure of the central bank do not explain how the SOEs would be protected from similar capture.

“Given our experience (over) the last ten years where some SOEs were captured, because [the] government had the sole power to appoint directors and auditors, the amendments to the Sarb Bill will make it easier to capture the Sarb,” he said.

The Banking Association South Africa (Basa) and Business Leadership South Africa (BLSA) have echoed Treasury’s views. In its submissions to Parliament, Basa says that changing the ownership structure of the central bank would not be in the public interest and that “the cost of redeeming the shares or litigation costs could be better allocated to other important projects.”

BLSA says changing the ownership structure of the Sarb could jeopardise the central bank’s credibility, given the country’s “creeping state control and failures that we are experiencing in the country.”

The ANC’s 54th National Conference resolution in 2017 resolved to have the bank 100% owned by the state. This resolution has however been placed on the back-burner given the country’s current economic and fiscal situation. In a submission to the finance standing committee, ANC alliance partner Cosatu however called for the bank’s ownership to be versed within the state, saying the current ownership structure is an outlier compared with other central banks which are owned by the state.

The standing committee on finance will now consider the Bill and then will either recommend that Parliament adopt or reject it.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   8

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

That is positive news for a change.

Temporary politicking publicity to make it look like they care about state capture.

They will tweak it slightly and have it passed in due course, still enabling capture.

Ths drive from the EFF to nationalise the Reserve Bank is nothing but a pathetic attempt to avoid their day in court. The VBS scandal exposed the EFF leaders for what they are, scoundrels who steal from the poor. The SARB is in control of money laundering legislation and the identification and persecution of Prominent Persons. Malema, and the Zuma crowd, do not like the Governor, who has the power to close or confiscate any bank account, to watch their every move. They want to strip these powers from the Governor and hand it over to the finance minister whom they will be able to capture via Luthuli House.

The corrupt cadres and the EFF hate the idea that the man in charge, the one who follows their every move, the one with the power to shut them out of the financial system, is not a corruptible politician, but the independent Governor of the SARB.

This drive for nationalisation is about the corrupt self-interest of opportunistic politicians. They are nothing but scoundrels who want to hide their criminality because they want to keep on plundering the assets of the nation.

It is positive now… but the constitution is changing to allow EWC…. and property could mean shares.

So the points are valid for not doing this; but why would parliamentarians listen to common sense?

The fight is on, South Africa is walking a thin line, hopefully in years to come, things will be better and we’d all be looking back and wondering what the hell happened.

However for now we must contend with cANCer and EFFluent

Then can go ahead and put the bank in the hands of the government if they want to end up like Zim.

(Moneyweb moderators DELETES COMMENTS when certain non-politically correct words appear in sentences).

Afraid of the truth?

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOL TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: