You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?

Higher rates to pile on debt pressures, dent saving

Savings ratio very low at around 15% of GDP.

On paper, looming interest rate hikes in South Africa should lift savings rates by boosting returns, but in reality they will only make it harder for heavily indebted households to repay loans, leaving little extra money to set aside.

Africa’s most advanced economy already has one of the worst savings rates in the world at less than a sixth of GDP, a legacy of the apartheid system that excluded the black majority from the formal financial system.

With the advent of democracy in 1994, banks flooded the market with cheap credit, spurring a frenzy of consumer demand that has left households grappling with a debt-to-disposable income ratio of more than 78%.

The central bank raised its benchmark lending rate by 25 basis points to 6% in July, and signalled more increases were on the cards to clamp down on inflation.

Commercial banks have lifted their own rates in tandem, good news for a small minority with savings but a strain on consumers paying interest of an average 12% on mortgages, car loans and credit cards.

“As a country we save way too little,” said Rian le Roux, an economist at Old Mutual Investment Group. “You’ve got a group that ought to be able to save but tell you they can’t, after paying off the excessively large monthly instalments on the fancy car they’re driving.”

One in four South Africans is unemployed, knocking millions out of the pool of savers.

That translates into a national savings rate of just 15.5% of GDP. With investment in the economy at about 20%, that leaves a 4.5% gap, or roughly 175 billion rand ($13 billion) to be plugged through foreign savings.

“That’s not necessarily a bad thing, but then we have to create the conditions that make foreigners want to invest here,” le Roux said.

By contrast, China’s savings rate is about 50% and India’s and Russia’s are at 34% and 20%, respectively.

Moody’s last week cited South Africa’s low savings and investment rates as impediments to raising its credit rating, but the structure of the domestic savings market does little to encourage people to squirrel away money for a rainy day.

South African banks pay savings deposit rates of 4-4.5% compared with inflation at 5.0%.

“The net real return is negative when you factor in inflation. If I’m saving, I should be able to match or beat inflation otherwise I’m simply eroding capital,” said South African Savings Institute CEO Gerald Mwandiambira.

Local banks say they do offer inflation-beating savings products, but blame the poor take-up on a tendency by South Africans to shy away from longer-term savings options.

“Successful saving ultimately boils down to which channels you decide to use,” said Matthew Hunter, head of savings and investments at Absa, the retail arm of Barclays Africa.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


You must be signed in to comment.


Not sure how one should read this articles as it seems to want to find some else to blame for over indebtedness by the black folk of this country. I firstly don’t think this is only the black community that is heavily indebted it is all races. Paragraph too seem to indicate that because of apartheid the blacks didn’t borrow, surely this is a good thing because since 1994 the blacks (to my mind all race groups) have been subjected to a lending frenzy by anyone who had funds to lend. So does the article infer that democracy is responsible for indebtedness or are not the real responsibly people for this mess not the people themselves. If you take on debt don’t look for a scapegoat for this debt – the debtor signed the forms and accepted the loan, knowing full well what the monthly repayments were likely to be. If as so many people have done and just taken on debt without a view that there really is a tomorrow, then they are were either irresponsible or stupid – the reality is that only the acquirer of debt can answer that one. So dear author and debt acceptor every decision has a consequence and it can either be positive or negative – in this scenario its negative

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: