You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

How the virus worsened SA’s debt woes

Charts that show how South Africa hasn’t managed to contain liabilities since the shock of the global financial crisis.
Former President Jacob Zuma. Image: Jackie Clausen/AFP/Getty Images

South Africa is faces surging debt as the havoc wrought by the coronavirus pandemic compounds a deterioration in public finances caused by overspending, mismanagement and alleged graft during former President Jacob Zuma’s nine-year rule.

After cutting borrowing during years of strong economic growth from the late 1990s, the government posted its first post-apartheid budget surplus in 2007. However, Finance Minister Tito Mboweni’s medium-term budget will show on Wednesday that debt levels are much higher than in 1994, when the ruling African National Congress took over an almost bankrupt state.

While the rand is near its best level since March and bond yields have recovered from a blowout when a virus lockdown started, the generic 10-year yield remains above 9%, suggesting a risk premium is still priced in on the country’s debt.

These charts that show how South Africa hasn’t managed to contain liabilities since the shock of the global financial crisis:

Even before the virus, increased spending to grow the government workforce and bail out state-owned companies such as Eskom Holdings conspired with below-target revenue and slow economic growth to boost debt. As a percentage of gross domestic product, it will peak in 2024 in the Treasury’s best-case scenario. That’s provided the government takes active steps to stabilise the trajectory and revive the economy.

“South Africa’s debt position is going to be unsustainable over the next five years because the fiscal consolidation measures are unfeasible,” said Mpho Molopyane, an economist at FirstRand Group’s Rand Merchant Bank. “Treasury won’t be in a position to deliver.”

South Africa’s debt-service costs probably rose to 4% of GDP in 2019-20, the highest since 2003, and will climb even further. The cost of servicing loans has been the fastest-growing expenditure item since 2011 and is crowding out money for development, including education and health.

The virus forced the ruling party to break its long-held resistance to borrowing from the International Monetary Fund, securing a $4.3 billion dollar emergency loan to bankroll part of a stimulus package announced by President Cyril Ramaphosa. The Treasury may introduce a debt limit in the budget, a suggestion proposed by the IMF almost two years ago.

Talks with the World Bank may have an impasse after the government rejected initial conditions attached to the funds it seeks to borrow.

South Africa could exceed its domestic-funding requirements for the year after issuing debt at an “alarming pace” to fund the budget deficit, said Mike van der Westhuizen, a portfolio manager at Citadel Investment Services. The strong take-up in domestic long-term loans is largely due to the Treasury doubling the limit on non-competitive auctions to 100%, he said.

That could give the Treasury the option of slowing the pace of domestic bond sales for the rest of the fiscal year, or continuing at the same rate to cover for a possible larger-than-expected revenue shortfall.

Yields on the country’s generic, rand-denominated 10-year debt have climbed since 2012, when South Africa began its march toward a full house of junk credit ratings. It lost its last investment-grade assessment at Moody’s Investors Service in March, more than 25 years after it was first awarded. The downgrades raised borrowing costs and complicated efforts to narrow the budget gap.

South Africa’s low level of debt in foreign currency is seen as a strength because it makes the country less vulnerable to rand weakness and could make it easier for the government to roll over maturing debt, according to Elina Ribakova, deputy chief economist at the Institute of International Finance. It could make the path toward a debt crisis similar to that of Argentina or Greece slower and longer.

What Bloomberg’s economist says

“The National Treasury has been making bold promises to restore the public finances since 2017, only to kick the can down the road later. This reflects the difficulty of reining in the wage bill and reducing transfers to state-owned enterprises. Given the limited options available to implement the envisioned consolidation plan, this time is likely to be no different.” –Boingotlo Gasealahwe, Africa economist.

© 2020 Bloomberg


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


The ‘bold’ but false promises made by the National Treasury are as a result of the devastating effects on the fiscus through the ANC’s destructive actions of corruption and the patronage employment and cadre department systems.

It’s not ‘alleged graft during former President Jacob Zuma’s nine-year rule’ but proven corruption throughout the ANC’s rule.

The problem is the ANC.

The virus of course being the ANC and their trade union and tenderpreneur cronies.

The World Bank will force the ANC to walk away from the destructive socialist policies towards free-market policies. This means that the World Bank will expect the ANC to become the DA. If the ANC becomes the DA, then ANC supporters will join the EFF. 80% of the voters are collectivist. If South Africa wants assistance from the World Bank, the collectivists will have to metamorphose into capitalists.

The virus did not do this. It was the destructive ANC response to the virus that created the additional mess.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: