You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Is the punchbowl half full or half empty?

The more subdued the economy, the greater the need for a boost.
The SA Reserve Bank still subscribes to the old punchbowl theory and can be expected to raise rates if it thinks inflation will increase. Image: Izumi T, Getty Images

Former US Federal Reserve chair William McChesney Martin famously said the job of the central bank is to take away the punchbowl just as the party gets going. In other words, it must act pre-emptively by hiking interest rates before the economy overheats and inflation rises. Richard Nixon, then vice-president, blamed Martin’s tight money stance for his defeat in the 1960 presidential election. In 1970, after his second attempt at becoming president succeeded, he fired Martin.

The Fed recently abandoned this old punchbowl theory of monetary policy.

Moneyweb Insider INSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full access to all our share and unit trust data tools, our award-winning articles, and support quality journalism in the process.

Choose an option:

R63 per month
R630 per year SAVE R126

You will be redirected to a checkout page.
To view all features and options, click here.

A monthly subscription is charged pro rata, based on the day of purchase. This is non-refundable and includes a R5 once-off sign-up fee.
A yearly subscription is refundable within 14 days of purchase and includes a 365-day membership.

Click here for more information.

After a major review, it effectively decided late last year that the punchbowl needs to remain in place so that the party can get going properly, and the more subdued the party has been, the longer the punchbowl needs to be there. It will only be taken away when guests really start misbehaving.

Running the economy hot

In other words, the Fed’s plan is to let the economy rev up so that those who want to work can find jobs, and so that the average inflation rate over an unspecified number of years can rise to its 2% target. Since inflation has been below 2% for so long, it would need to be above 2% for some time for the target to be reached on average.

As far as the labour market is concerned, the experience immediately prior to the pandemic showed that the more jobs become available, the more discouraged work seekers re-enter the labour force.

Low unemployment did not lead to higher inflation, as the so-called Philips Curve suggested it would.

Why does this matter?

It matters because the market is testing the Fed’s commitment to the new punchbowl theory.

Bond yields in the US have been rising as prospects for economic growth improve. The market is betting that the Fed will start tightening policy sooner than it says (first by ending quantitative easing and then by hiking interest rates). Basically, it is betting that the Fed will be spooked by the first sign of rowdiness at the party and start whisking away the drinks.

US 10-year government bond yield and policy interest rate, %

Source: Refinitiv Datastream

That is not how the Fed sees it. At its monthly policy meeting last week, it did not change its stance in response to higher yields.

Instead, it reiterated that the Fed would need to see clear evidence of “substantial further progress” in the labour market and sustainable increases in inflation before even talking about slowing its bond purchase programme and eventually raising rates.

“We will continue to provide the economy with the support that it needs for as long as it takes,” noted current Chair Jerome Powell.

The famous ‘dot plot’ still shows no hikes on the horizon, even though the Fed’s own forecasts for economic growth are 6.5% this year – the fastest expansion since the early 1980s. It marked up its growth projection following the passage of the American Rescue Plan Act: President Joe Biden’s $1.9 trillion fiscal injection which included $1 400 cheques mailed to many households.

The Fed projects inflation to rise above 2% this year, but then fall back in subsequent years. In contrast, many market participants expect sustained higher inflation, and hence expect the Fed to be making moves towards the punchbowl sooner.

US policy interest rate and inflation, %

Source: Refinitiv Datastream

Price pressures

There are certainly price pressures in global value chains at the moment as there are all sorts of bottlenecks, shortages and disruptions. There is a global lack of microchips, for instance, which impacts a wide range of products including vehicles.

The blocking of the Suez Canal by one of the world’s largest cargo ships added to these pressures, causing considerable delays. Some other ships were rerouted around the Cape. As with most other bottlenecks, this was temporary. All involved parties had every incentive to address the problem as quickly as possible.

Read: Giant ship finally freed, allowing canal to reopen: Suez update

The other source of inflation, also temporary, is simply the fact that prices fell sharply a year ago. Take the oil price. It hit a low of $16 per barrel in mid-April last year. On Friday, it was $61 – 132% higher on a year-on-year basis.

However, if the oil price stays at $61 for the next 12 months, oil inflation will fall to zero. This will add to headline inflation across the world.

Fuel comprises roughly 5% of the South African inflation basket and 3% in America. In other words, the impact is likely to be limited and transitory unless oil prices keep rising and firms keep passing those costs on to consumers, and consumers in turn bargain for higher wages to compensate for the increased cost of living, which again forces firms to increase selling prices.

This is the dynamic that led to runaway inflation in the 1970s, but it seems very unlikely now.

Unemployment rates are still elevated and consumer demand constrained. No one has much bargaining power in a globalised economy. The oil price will always be volatile, but sustained increases can only take place with ever-tighter supply cutbacks, since demand may have permanently peaked, as the International Energy Agency recently predicted, due to higher fuel efficiency of newer cars and the increased sales of electric vehicles.

At any rate, oil acts as a tax. Higher fuel prices often reduce demand for other items, putting downward pressure on their prices. The same is true of higher food prices.

In other words, it doesn’t look like the Fed will blink, and the market might therefore be too aggressive in its pricing of higher interest rates.

The market’s punching bags

Bond yields are still low in absolute terms, but it is the speed with which they’ve moved up that has caused problems both for equity markets (which have been volatile over the past few weeks) and for emerging markets, the traditional punching bags of world markets.

Further sharp increases would be problematic, but nothing ever moves up in a straight line. The increase in US yields since the start of the year is of a similar magnitude to previous spurts higher, suggesting that by historical standards at least, most of the adjustment is behind us.

What would really hurt emerging markets would be a one-two punch of higher bond yields and a stronger dollar.

American growth is expected to surpass that of other advanced economies. Europe in particular has delivered a much smaller fiscal stimulus package, spread out over a longer period. It has also suffered a worse coronavirus impact and has been slower to get its vaccination campaign going.

While all the ‘money printing’ in the US should be negative for the dollar, the higher associated growth rates and bond yields is positive. The dollar started weakening against the euro in May last year as investor risk appetite increased. That has been reversing since the start of the year.

Early hikers

Brazil and Russia joined Turkey last week in becoming the first major economies to see their central banks hike interest rates since the pandemic struck. In the case of Turkey, it cost the central bank head his job. Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan is now on his third central bank chief in two years, someone he hopes will be more sympathetic to his low-rates-at-all-cost view of the world.

Needless to say, the market doesn’t see it that way, and punch-drunk Turkish bonds, equities and the currency took further heavy blows.

We may have our shortcomings, but our credible and independent central bank is not one of them.

As for Brazil and Russia, both economies do face accelerating inflation – most emerging markets are more inflation-prone than the more flexible and services-heavy developed economies – and interest rates are coming off record lows. The increase in global bond yields will have weighed on policymakers’ minds.

The South African Reserve Bank is not there yet. Its Monetary Policy Committee (MPC) left the repo rate unchanged in a unanimous decision.

Read: Sarb holds repo rate at 3.5%

In the previous two meetings, two of the five MPC members voted for a cut. Their unanimity this time suggests further cuts are off the table for now.

Actual inflation remains quite low. Consumer inflation dipped to 2.9% year-on-year in February as food price inflation cooled and medical insurance, a big item in the consumer price index, increased 4.7% from a year ago, a much slower pace than usual. Core inflation, which excludes volatile food and fuel prices, fell to a record low of 2.6%.

SA repo rate and consumer inflation %

Source: Refinitiv Datastream

On target

While the Reserve Bank raised its 2021 inflation forecast somewhat, due largely to higher assumed fuel and electricity prices, inflation is expected to remain comfortably within the target range. It is forecast to average 4.3% this year, 4.4% next year and 4.5% in 2023.

Inflation expectations also remain well anchored. The Bureau for Economic Research’s first quarter survey of households, businesses, unions and analysts shows inflation is expected to average 4.5% over the next five years, slightly lower than the previous quarter.

Given that the Reserve Bank targets inflation of 4.5% (the midpoint between 3% and 6%), the repo rate could remain at 3.5% for some time.

However, our central bank very much still subscribes to the old punchbowl theory and can be expected to raise rates if it anticipates that inflation will increase.

As with other emerging market central banks, it doesn’t have the luxury of ignoring a tightening of global financial conditions. If there is an episode of large-scale capital flight, it might be forced to raise interest rates as it did in 2013 and 2014.

So far, the rand has been fairly stable, and as the MPC statement noted, the impact of exchange rate movements on inflation has declined over time.

For the time being, low interest rates support the local economy.

Also noting the strong global growth environment, the Reserve Bank raised South Africa’s growth forecast for 2021 to 3.8% from 3.6% previously, while the outlooks for 2022 and 2023 remain unchanged at 2.4% and 2.5% respectively.

If realised, these would be very impressive numbers compared with recent history.


So what is the punchline of this story from an investment point of view?

Though the Reserve Bank’s forecast model suggests two interest rate hikes during the course of the year, this seems unlikely given the muted inflation outlook.

South African cash is likely to deliver negative real returns this year.

Bonds have taken a knock over the past month as yields have followed global yields higher. These yields of 9% to 10% remain attractive compared with expected inflation, but investors will clearly have to stomach some volatility.

As for equities, some sectors and companies in the global market are at risk from higher yields as their valuations will have to adjust lower. But at the same time, strong global economic growth means companies can grow earnings rapidly. Together with policymakers’ ample support, this means it is still a very favourable backdrop for equities once investor expectations of yields settle.

Izak Odendaal and Dave Mohr are investment strategists at Old Mutual Wealth.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


The real inflation is in asset prices (talking US) due probably in main to net negative interest yields.

Look at records levels in
Total US Market Cap : GDP
Schiller Index
Forward earnings multiples

Look at make believe IPO’s.

How can many large industries be laid to waste by covid and the changes it brought about, but stock markets pretend all is fine?

The present value of future earnings is a function of the risk-free rate. If the risk-free rate is zero or negative, what restraint is there on share prices?

Apparently no restraint for the spreadsheet jockeys!

Incredible how people think fundamental analysis is predicting future earnings and applying a guesstimated discount rate to a guesstimated earnings number. Almost 15y ago Nokia spreadsheet looked beautiful. Then came the Apple smartphone… shareholders that bought the DCF at highs lost tens of billions. Then Microsoft wrote off another $20b on the remains. The list is endless of assumptions gone wrong.

Spreadsheet assumptions and journal entries is how the property sector sits with its valuation problem. Tweak the occupancy, tweak the rentals, tweak the expenses, tweak the cap rate and you have a range of 50% on management valuations. I long for the bad old days of Non Distributable Reserves. IFRS is toxic.

Very good article. With inflation below 5%, and bonds paying close to 9,5% it seems like a good deal (but for the horrendous tax leakage of 45%). If the tax can be mitigated inflation plus 4%+ “risk free” seems like a super deal so within a RA or pension it is close to equity like returns with bond risk and volatility. Seems attractive but then yields could expand with a downgrade but I guess you hold to maturity then

This time around, not only has the US Central Bank spiked the punch-bowl with High Octane Spirits but they have put out 20 punch-bowls and are still not removing them, leaving a massive hangover to come, which will be in the form of a sharp rise in inflation and a stock market correction the likes of which we have not seen for 80 years.

Contrary to belief, the central banks export inflation to the market, its called Expropriation Through Inflation.

By printing more money they they devalue the currency, a whopping 20% of all dollar notes in existence were printed last year. Subsequently prices for products have gone up except our salaries, This is why unions especially in the US are demanding an increase in the minimum wage across all sectors.

The same theory was tried many times in history, The Roman Empire after Julius Cesar, reminted gold coins with a lesser gold quantity and therefore bringing more into existence whilst also devaluing the entire punch blow.

A key indicator is the devaluing price of the USD against Bitcoin. I personally expect the IMF to either collapse or issue a New Tradable Currency that cannot be inflated at the will of politicians, this might help solve the $280 Trillion Dollar Debt problem.

$280 trillion dollar debt? what source?

US federal is around $30t. Add $70t corporate and $15t household debt. But total cash is around $240t.

Debt : Equity is fairly high at around .9 for corporates but that number gets distorted by definitions. Explanation: Equity is an accounting aberration. Apple will soon achieve (it can already) achieve the bizarre where their equity goes negative (the shares they repurchase and cancel reduce the historic capital issued plus earnings).

What is the debt:equity ratio when you have negative equity??? That will flip a few spreadsheets…

ok thought you were saying US debt 280trillion

Crazy thing is US corporate cash is 240 trillion. 1% of 1% of that roughly takes care of Eskom debt …

Another crazy thing is many companies have massive cash and massive debt. The one, she is tax deductible, the other, she sits in an offshore tax haven. The US needs to square off its source system for companies!

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: