You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to visit our Mobile web app instead?

SA country risk adds to rates pressure: Sarb

See chart: real interest rates remain at elevated levels.
Image: Shutterstock

South Africa’s rising country risk is putting upward pressure on interest rates, even as inflation expectations decline, with credit-rating companies contributing to the negative sentiment, according to the central bank.

Moody’s Investors Service cut its 2020 economic growth forecast for South Africa to 0.7% from 1% on Monday and said the nation’s relatively high real interest rates are constraining expansion. The ratings company is the only major one that considers South Africa’s debt investment grade, but that assessment is at risk after it changed its outlook to negative in November. Credit-default swaps already price South Africa at junk.

“South African quite clearly has serious growth challenges, but these go quite far beyond monetary policy,” Chris Loewald, head of economic policy development and research at the central bank and a member of the monetary policy committee, told lawmakers in Cape Town on Tuesday. “The higher South African premium creates upside pressure on the rates that is very hard to ignore. If we can continue to get lower inflation and keep it well behaved and de-risk the economy, that definitely creates more monetary policy space.”

The rand declined as much as 0.7% to trade at 15.0884 per dollar – its weakest level since October 31 – before recovering to trade at 15.0378 by 4:57 p.m. in Johannesburg. Yields on generic 10-year notes climbed 3 basis points to 8.93%, the highest this month.

Moody’s comments on Monday could be read to suggest there is room to cut rates, but more likely referenced “the frustratingly slow pace of reforms needed to unlock South Africa’s growth,” said Henrik Gullberg, a macro strategist at Coex Partners in London.

“If broader risk sentiment is supportive, rate cuts could even be rand-supportive as it would underpin growth prospects and capital inflows,” Gullberg said.

Downward cycle
The inflation-targeting central bank has often drawn criticism from politicians and labor unions who say it should do more to bolster an economy stuck in its longest downward cycle since at least 1945 and reduce unemployment that’s at 29%. While the MPC cut its key interest rate by 25 basis points in January, the real rate, which adjusts for price growth, remains above 2%.

While real interest rates are high relative to South Africa’s emerging market peers, the central bank’s approach to its key rate has been sensible due to the risks associated with deteriorating public finances, according to Gina Schoeman, an economist at Citigroup South Africa.

A cautious approach by the MPC in a country where fiscal risk is high, “is the more responsible approach,” she said. “They’re still providing a cushion for the country to fall back on.”

Citigroup forecasts two more interest-rate cuts of 25 basis points this year, but said the MPC is unlikely to cut too fast. The panel will want to signal that it is “reluctant but willing” to lower the benchmark rate only if inflation expectations and its price-risk perceptions allow, Schoeman said.

While a government report on Wednesday will probably show inflation quickened in January, it remains close to the 4.5% midpoint of the target range. South Africans are becoming accustomed to lower inflation and price-growth expectations are easing, Loewald said.

“The trajectory of inflation, the risk factors, feed into the way monetary policy is thought about,” he said. “We have achieved lower inflation and we have achieved policy credibility.”

Power shortages
Even so, Africa’s most-industrialised economy hasn’t expanded at more than 2% annually since 2013 and neither the central bank nor the National Treasury see it reaching that level by 2022. Power shortages have been a major constraint on growth and exports, while increasing levels of public debt and a large current-account deficit constitute serious risk factors, according to the central bank.

Investors and ratings companies will keep a close eye on Finance Minister Tito Mboweni’s budget presentation on Feb. 26 to see how the government plans to reign in the deficit and debt levels. Moody’s is scheduled to review South Africa’s Baa3 credit rating in March. The firm’s lead sovereign analyst for South Africa, Lucie Villa, said on Tuesday they could cut the rating if the nation can’t rein in spending, boost growth and improve tax compliance to stabilise debt.

“If it wasn’t for the Moody’s downgrade concern, they would’ve cut already,” Elize Kruger, an independent economist, said about the central bank.

© 2020 Bloomberg L.P.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


You must be signed in to comment.


I cannot agree with Moody’s when they state that “South African growth challenges go far beyond monetary policy.”

Luthuli House is a mere 1.1 km or five minute’s walk from the Reserve Bank. Luthuli House represents 90% of our growth challenges. The Reserve Bank is the home of monetary policy and Luthuli House is the home of economic horror stories. They are right next to each other.

The only correlation is the ANC being in power and the country risk rising, to the point of no return.

Why is the Rand so Strong while all this nonsense is happening in SA?

Surely you jest Sir. Nearly R20 to 1BPS and 15/16 to US$ is not cheap.

A bit deeper into the socialist/communist/unionist Sh..hole.

Whichever investment banker or rating agency staff member who sees SA as ‘investment grade’ should be dismissed forthwith. It’s a junk-status banana republic

Managed by rubbish and elected by rubbish

Was jus browsing but this comment made me login jus to say

Jou Ma

Fortune500, I love it! This is what free speech in SA looks like. The people from Cape Town will tune you straight. You know where you stand with them. They don’t mince their words. I share your feelings about the taxman, but SAM is cool.

And the progressives that voted “yes” in 1992 are nowhere to be found..never mind their leaders

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: