Cement imports rocket by 51% in the first eight months of 2021

Were however hampered by lockdown restrictions last year – but the ban on their use on public sector projects from November 4 is expected to have major impact.
Vietnam has overtaken Pakistan as the source of most of the cement imports coming into SA. Image: Shutterstock

Cement imports increased by 51% to 749 671 tons with a free on board (FOB) value of R445 million in the first eight months of this year compared to the same period in 2020, but that was when Covid-19 lockdown restrictions hampered imports.

However, cement imports during this eight-month period were also 3% higher than for the same pre-Covid period in 2019.

Elsie Snyman, CEO of construction market intelligence firm Industry Insight, said 1 256 984 tons of cement were imported into South Africa over the last 12 months and imports are well on track to reach the peak of early 2015 when more than 1.4 million tons were imported over the 12-month period up to February 2015.

However, Snyman said the designation of cement, which bans the use of imported cement on public sector projects, will have a major impact on suppliers of imported cement.

Read: Treasury bans use of imported cement on all government-funded projects

The use of imported cement on all government-funded projects has been prohibited by National Treasury effective from November 4, 2021.

‘Major victory’

Snyman said the ban is seen as a major victory for local cement producers, with the new rule requiring all tender invitations to use locally produced cement made from locally sourced raw materials.

“With over one million tons of cement imported each year and 330 000 tons of clinker, local cement producers are hoping to increase sales volumes and improve profitability in the industry, improve capacity utilisation while protecting jobs.

“The announcement supported investor sentiment, with both PPC and Sephaku Cement share prices increasing by between 20% and 40%,” said Snyman.

“This added a total of R2.26 billion to the market cap values of the two cement producers. While imported cement can still be used on private construction projects, it is hands off in terms of public sector funded projects,” she said.

Infrastructure boost

The designation of South African produced cement has assumed greater importance because of the government’s planned massive infrastructure investment plan.

The government in July 2020 unveiled 50 Strategic Infrastructure Projects (SIP) and 12 special projects, involving a total investment of R340 billion, as the first tranche of a massive infrastructure expenditure programme to drive the post Covid-19 economic recovery effort.

Earlier this month the government unveiled the second tranche of projects, comprising a pipeline of 55 new catalytic infrastructure projects from various sectors valued at about R595 billion.


JSE-listed Sephaku Holdings, whose building and construction materials asset portfolio comprises subsidiary Métier Mixed Concrete and associate Dangote Cement South Africa (SepCem), said this month the Infrastructure Fund had reported that it had submitted four projects, collectively valued at R21 billion, for National Treasury approval and will contribute R5.4 billion through finance from both public and private resources.

It said these projects have supposedly been approved by Infrastructure South Africa, which is tasked with overseeing the government’s infrastructure investment plan, and the Infrastructure Fund is apparently finalising four more projects valued at about R85 billion for submission in 2022.

Bryan Perrie, the CEO of Cement & Concrete SA (CCSA), told Moneyweb earlier this month the designation of cement will assist in protecting the local cement industry from unfair competition.

Importers’ public-sector exposure

Snyman said an Industry Insight survey indicated that more than 80% of the cement supplied was used on public sector contracts, “suggesting this ban on imported materials will have a major impact on suppliers of imported materials”.

She said Cemza, a joint venture between South African company Osho Cement and Germany-based Heidelberg Cement that manufactures cement using imported clinker, is also affected by the ban because it includes the use of raw materials.

“Their exposure, according to our survey results, shows around 45% to public sector contracts,” she said.

Snyman added that while the ban on imported cement is justified, the ban on using imported raw materials is perhaps a little bit more questionable because this is a common practice for many other local manufacturers in other sectors, including steel.

She said imported cement, including cement supplied by Cemza, contributed about 3% nationally to public sector infrastructure projects according to Industry Insight’s survey results, with the highest contribution in the Northern Cape at 11%.

Source: Industry Insight

She said imports then emanated largely from Pakistan, but Vietnam has since taken the spotlight because it is now responsible for most of the cement imports into the country while no imports of cement from China were recorded in the first eight months of the year.

Imported cement importers are facing further threats because the International Trade Administration Commission (Itac) in December 2020 accepted an application from the cement industry for a sunset review of the import tariffs imposed on cement from Pakistan five years ago.

The cement industry is also still waiting for Itac to finalise an application first submitted to it in August 2019 for “safeguard action” against cheap cement imports, particularly from countries such as China and Vietnam.

Price, investment concerns

Snyman said price concerns have already raised their head because some feel the ban on imported cement may support higher price increases from local producers as localisation tends to increase costs while simultaneously discouraging investment.

This will reduce funds available for infrastructure and increase building costs, she said.

“One also must be mindful of the fact that this announcement by government could impact negatively not just in the sector directly affected [namely cement], but investment in other manufacturing sectors, where investors may very well fear a similar rebuke from the government down the line.

“Local cement producers do however invest billions into the South African economy, providing thousands of job opportunities and as a sector should be protected, without discouraging much-needed foreign direct investment or unintended consequences such as price rallies,” she said.

Statistics SA data reveals that cement prices increased by an average of 11.5% in 2019, slowing to an average of less than 2% in 2020 as the sector was hit hard by the Covid-19 pandemic, and have increased by an average of 6.9% in the first eight months of this year.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


They’ve banned imported cement on state projects, but the government must go a step further.

They must also ban imported labour and imported steel.

The local cement brand is of superior quality. The same cannot be said for local labour though.

The labour laws already provide protection to members of labour unions and favour union members at the expense of the unemployed. In typical communist fashion, the labour laws enable the unions to exploit consumers and to hold entrepreneurs at ransom with extortive wage demands. The government expropriates the rights and purchasing power of consumers to bribe their alliance partners.

Labour laws protect the privileged position of the unproductive union members. The law enforces unproductivity and destroys the competitiveness of the local industry. We have record unemployment because we have the socialist Tripartite Alliance.

Quite the contrary, local cement was 32,5 MPA before the imported brands arrived, which were 42.5 MPA strength and at a far lower price. The local manufacturers then increased their strength to match, which goes to show that South Africa were getting milked by the local inductry for decades. In addition, local cement prices were subject to a bi-annual price increase and were curtailed by the imports. You would be paying R200 for a bag of cement if it were not for the imported brands!!

Two for two EFF Commissar. Starting to make more sense. First healthcare, now business. Keep it up. Next ‘crime & security’?

Yeah…agree, if EFF Commie continues with talking more sense, and becomes pro-business / pro-capital, and becomes like the DA….I’ll even vote for him 😉

@EFF. “…govt must also ban imported labour…”

The other day on a different article you expressed your sympathy/support for Zimbabweans looking for work permits/asylum in SA.

Now you say “away with foreign labour”…??

No need to explain why you differ. Exactly like the EFF mafia boss…they change their story, based on the audience on a particular day/place.

Expect serious shortages after November and a bit of a price increase as well!!

Better colour all locally produced cement Purple then, as I don’t see the bidders for smaller projects (eg projects in rural areas) staying honest and only buying from certain cement suppliers. They will buy whatever is the cheapest.
In the long run this will be bad for keeping our local producers competitive.

Before the arrival of imported cement brands, the local market was carved up amongst the local manufacturers. Cape Town for instance, was only supplied by PPC, you could not find another brand. Local cement was 32.5 MPA standard and the prices were increasing at a fast pace!! The imported cement came in at 42.5 MPA strenght at a lower price prompting the local manufacturers to increase their strenght to international standards, curtail their bi-annual price hikes and created a competitive environment .

and here I thought that the MPA strength referred to concrete, which varies depending on your mix of cement, stone and sand?

That’s what I learnt during my house building days. If you order readymix, you order MPA strength to meet the project needs.

Standard mix of 3:2:1 will vary dependent on the cement binding strength.
Hence the strength will vary dependent on the cement product used for every supplier thereof.

I support the designation.But why do our local cement companies struggle to dominate the local market without government interference,like say for example the retail sector or even the banking sector?

Sounds like they also have to do an introspection on themselves.

A combination of high wages with low productivity, BEE requirements to qualify for state contracts and the failing local infrastructure that forced cement producers to switch from rail to road. There are more reasons and then also adding that many of the imported cement come from countries with low wages with high productivity, it really isn’t possible to compete.

…correct. And only the weak Rand helps SA to compete internationally when it comes to manufacturing. And then we’ll still more expensive than an equivalent foreign product.

Cannot compare those types of businesses. Those are location based businesses which you are forced to use locally, the best example of this is a restaurant. You cannot go to a restaurant in China every time you want to eat.

Also just look at the already forgotten NUMSA strike from last week. If anyone says they going to start say a manufacturing business and make it more efficient and it will be competitive is kidding themselves. You have baseline costs and culture that even the best cannot ignore in your costing.

Let the market decide. The market is always right. When politicians interfere it will just go from bad to worse.

They use lots of very expensive electricity as well.

If the anc want to fix something fix ESKOM and get cheap electricity. That will make many businesses more competitive.

Unfortunately that lot has no ability except destroy things. This is just one small example.

Reason for rocketing volumes of imported cement (for non-gov projects) is that it can be imported cheaper.

Protection helps to retain (the remaining) jobs that are left, but EVERYONE pays for poor efficiency.

(Years of militant labour strife did this country no service. Not for business that cannot compete, and equally bad for job losses as evident in unemployment rate. ANC policies = a lose lose.)

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: