You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

Designation of locally-produced cement apparently approved

But application yet to be formally gazetted, says new industry body.
The move aims to protect the industry against foreign producers that don’t have to comply with empowerment and labour requirements. Image: Supplied

The designation of locally-produced cement, which will make it mandatory for it to be used by contractors on any government projects and prohibit the use of imported cement on these projects, has reportedly been approved in principle by National Treasury.

Bryan Perrie, CEO of Cement & Concrete SA (CCSA), a newly established consolidated concrete and cement industry body, said on Monday that his understanding from the Department of Trade and Industry and Competition [dtic] is that the industry’s application for designation is with National Treasury.

“According to [the dtic], it has been approved but still has to go through the chief procurement officer or something like that to be formally gazetted. In principle, designation has been approved but that is the best I have. I don’t have anything in writing,” he said.

However, National Treasury said on Tuesday the cement designation process is under review and undergoing National Treasury internal processes.”It would be untrue to say National Treasury has approved it in principle,” it said.

The matter has become more important in light of the government’s planned massive infrastructure investment plan.

The government in July 2020 unveiled 50 Strategic Infrastructure Projects and 12 special projects, involving a total investment of R340 billion, as the first tranche of a massive infrastructure expenditure programme to drive the post Covid-19 economic recovery effort.

Read:
First post-pandemic-recovery infrastructure projects gazetted
‘Smoke and mirrors’ from government on infrastructure expenditure

The 2021 Budget Review released last week revealed that government has a programme to spend R791.2 billion on infrastructural investment over the next three years.

The CCSA has been established through the consolidation of The Concrete Institute (TCI), the Concrete Society of Southern Africa and the Association of Cementitious Material Producers (ACMP), and was launched on Monday.

Perrie, who was previously CEO of TCI, said all that designation means is that locally-produced cement must be used for any government-funded project, whether it is a local, municipal, provincial, national or state-owned enterprise project.

He said the designation will have to be enforced to ensure that contractors do not use imported cement, which is where the problem arises.

Perrie added that much of the imported cement coming into South Africa meets the regulatory standard but is partially subsidised in the countries where it is produced.

“They [imported cement producers] also don’t have to comply with the empowerment requirements, the labour requirements, and don’t have the Mining Charter,” he said.

Perrie said imported cement producers can make the right quality of cement and the designation “is really to protect the local industry from unfair competition effectively”.

Read: Cement imports accelerate

He said the CCSA will in future take the lead on all matters related to cement and concrete in South Africa, including tariff protection against imported cement and the designation of cement.

The International Trade Administration Commission (Itac) in December 2020 accepted an application from the cement industry for a sunset review of the import tariffs imposed on cement from Pakistan five years ago.

Perrie said all the information has been provided to Itac for this review “so the ball is in their court”.

The cement industry is also still waiting for Itac to finalise an application first submitted to the commission in August 2019 by TCI, on behalf of the industry, for “safeguard action” against cheap cement imports, particularly from countries such as China and Vietnam.

‘Authoritative engagement’

Commenting on the rationale for the establishment of CCSA, Perrie said there was always a huge amount of confusion about what the three organisations were doing.

He said ACMP, for instance, “sits in the background and very few people know about them”.

“They are very involved with government in legislation on emissions and carbon tax and that sort of stuff,” he said.

Perrie added that companies were putting money into all three organisations but felt it would be far better to put their resources into a single body that represents and can be the voice of the broader cement and concrete industry and also hopefully eliminate any overlaps and gaps in what they were doing.

He said CCSA has been mandated to promote and support the industry to drive growth and deliver shared value through a unified platform for cement and concrete.

Read: Operating environment potentially improves for SA cement industry

The body will create long-term shared value and industry growth in South Africa by driving collaboration, skills development, innovation, and the highest standards in sustainable cement and concrete materials and products, he added.

“At a time where many conflicting and ambiguous messages are shared readily on various platforms, and with the proliferation of substandard products and services, the need for authoritative engagement with all stakeholders is critical,” he said.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   3

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Like BEE “protecting” the industry is doing the opposite by making it uncompetitive and weak.

Who pays the premium? Why? Can we afford it? Sounds like SAA???

Shame. There is just no ability in this country. You can imagine how useless SA is when cement can be brought in from China and Vietnam (The other side of the world),, and sell for half the price???

Why is there a requirement for skills development????? We had all these skills for decades???? WHAT HAPPENED?????

the anc happened.

TSK!!!! Useless!!!!

Once again this govt lining it’s own pockets , guess who has shares in Sephaku ?

I get the arguments on SA competitiveness however other countries are already doing the same and doing this quite aggressively for some time especially the USA. So there are benefits in doing this local designation but this is not the problem.

There is designation in other supply / manufacturing sectors already that are much easier to verify and police and there are problems with fraud, suppliers sign declarations that they are compliant and is taken at face value and the system relies on whistle blowers through manufacturing associations to police and follow up.

This situation is worse and I would really like to see how they are going to police every pocket being used on these sites.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: