You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

How worried should we be about reports of blood clots and AstraZeneca’s vaccine?

Are there precedents of vaccine safety scares?
Image: Anthony Devlin/Bloomberg

Europe’s drug watchdog is reviewing a small number of reports of bleeding, blood clots and low platelet counts in people who have received AstraZeneca’s coronavirus vaccine.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has said it has so far found no causal link between the vaccine and the incidents. The World Health Organisation has also said there was no proven link and people should not panic.

At least 13 EU member states including Germany, France, Italy have suspended use of the shot pending the outcome of EMA’s probe.

Here’s what we know so far:

What has happened?

More than 45 million Covid shots by all manufacturers have been administered across the EU and the European Economic Area since vaccinations started almost three months ago.

The EMA is investigating reports of 30 cases of unusual blood disorders out of 5 million people who got the AstraZeneca vaccine in the EU.

The EMA’s focus and primary concern is on cases of blood clots in the head, a rare condition that’s difficult to treat called cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT).

In Germany, seven people aged 20 to 50 have been diagnosed with CVT up to 16 days after vaccination as per Monday, according to the national vaccine authority Paul Ehrlich Institute (PEI). Based on the known rate of CVT in the general population, the PEI would have expected one case in 1.6 million.

What have other countries and AstraZeneca said?

Britain has administered more than 11 million doses of the AstraZeneca vaccine and reports of blood clots were no greater than would have occurred naturally. The UK’s medicine regulator has urged Britons to keep on getting their vaccines, including the AstraZeneca shot.

Canada has said health experts are sure all Covid-19 vaccines being administered in the country are safe, including AstraZeneca’s.

AstraZeneca said on Sunday a review of safety data of more than 17 million people vaccinated in the United Kingdom and European Union with its vaccine had shown no evidence of an increased risk of blood clots. ​

What is the EMA investigating?

EMA investigators are checking if the frequency of incidences is higher in the vaccinated population than normal background rates.

The normal frequency is drawn from public health statistics or insurance records. This would be combined with a medical analysis of each case and insight from scientific literature.

EMA’s head of safety monitoring, Peter Arlett, added the rarity of CVT meant the watchdog would have to rely more heavily on case-by-case analysis rather than on the sparse statistical data.

A spokeswomen for Germany’s vaccine authority, which is part of the investigation, said EMA would not rule on causality.

Instead, EMA will assess the likelihood of an increased risk of the condition and weigh that against the benefits of fighting Covid-19 and providing relief for health systems.

For example, the vaccines developed by Pfizer and Moderna have been linked with increased risk of anaphylaxis, but they are still recommended because benefits outweigh the risks of the side effect, which can be treated.

The regulator has said it remains for now “firmly convinced” that the product’s benefit outweighs any risks.

What did the clinical trials show?

AstraZeneca and European regulators have said that concerns about blood coagulation disorders did not emerge during human trials.

Safety monitoring after approval is key because extremely rare side-effects, or those affecting only a small subset of the population, are near impossible to identify during clinical trials, according to PEI.

Are there precedents of vaccine safety scares?

In Japan, a governmental recommendation for use of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine to prevent cervical cancer has been suspended since June 2013, due to media reports of an alleged pain syndrome. This has drawn criticism from the WHO.

A study published in The Lancet Public Health last year concluded a continued suspension would lead to thousands of cancer deaths over the next decades.

In Ukraine, deep mistrust of vaccines has allowed measles to grow into an epidemic. Vaccine hesitancy there is rooted in corruption and mistrust of authority but also in a temporary government suspension in 2008, when a 17-year-old boy died shortly after receiving a measles-rubella vaccine.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


”Blood clots and bleeding” is a catastrophic combination.

Warfarin is the only agent, that not only thins the blood but also ”prevents clotting”. I think we should be more worried about the ”competition” and financial goals of the so-called scientists that are developing all these vaccines. My main concerns with regards to the precedents of vaccine safety scares are:

• What co-operation exists between the classification of all the risks associated with critical system coordination, global spread mechanisms, and prevention and mitigation failure.

• The classification system highlights convergent risk factors that merit prioritisation and uncovers potential knowledge gaps between all the vaccine developers.

• What about the classification systems, which is supposed to structure an ongoing, dynamic process of knowledge aggregation and horizon scanning.

• I think it’s high time for a transparent process and methodology policy implications for research agendas and prevention and mitigation prioritisation.

We are kept in the dark with constant fear-mongering – what has really happened since the 1918/20 pandemics – isn’t it time that are these scientists and governments volunteering more information?

Listen to what Dr. Geert vanden Bossche(he is world renowned for development of various vaccines) said about the vaccines. Geert has been involved into making vaccines for more than 20y and worked for all the big companies and was project manager for loads of them. So he is not anti-vaccines, but he said these vaccines are being administer the wrong time as the virus already is here and the virus is mutating which render the vaccine useless and the vaccine also “pause your immune response. So basically- stop the vaccinations now

Always a pleasure being a lab rat…I guess saver than a ride in a South African taxi – just .

The vaccines differ in technology. Some I cannot take because I have a history of anaphylactic reaction to other drugs.

The same will apply to each vaccine for different people for different reasons.

I honestly do not understand what all the fuss is about. Ivermectin is highly effective, cheap, safe and readily available at your local vet or agricultural retailer. Why complicate stuff?

Just to highlight 2 very important words:

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) has said it has SO FAR found no causal link between the vaccine and the incidents.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: