Proudly sponsored by

For Zimbabwe investors, stock exchange closing is the last straw

‘I’m locked out and I’m not sure how this is legal.’
A sign sits on the wall of the Zimbabwe Stock Exchange in Harare, Zimbabwe. Image: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg

When Zimbabwe suspended trading on its stock exchange last week, James Hove was left with no access to the funds he needs to conduct his business.

Like many wealthy Zimbabweans, Hove invests in the local stock market. Not for the value he sees in the companies whose stocks trade on it, but as a hedge against surging consumer prices: while annual inflation is running at 786%, the benchmark Zimbabwe Stock Exchange industrial index has risen sevenfold this year.

The authorities halted trade because they say speculation, and the use of dual-traded stocks as an indicator of the future exchange rate, are undermining the nation’s currency.

“I’m locked out and I’m not sure how this is legal,” Hove, a 48-year-old property trader, said by phone from Harare, the capital. “They’ve just tied up money I really need right now. How can they do this?”

The shutdown of the stock exchange and the suspension of large mobile-money transactions, ordered by the country’s security chiefs, is the latest measure that robs investors in Zimbabwe, both local and foreign, of the certainty needed to make decisions.

Since 2000, when the government began encouraging the violent takeover of white-owned commercial farms, investors have faced the sudden seizure of assets and bouts of hyperinflation. They’ve also suffered a chaotic currency regime that’s in turn seen the abolition of the local currency, its reinstatement a decade later, and overnight conversions of U.S. dollar holdings in local banks into Zimbabwe dollars.

Throughout that period, and indeed since independence in 1980, the country has been ruled by the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front.

The stock market, which in contrast to the cratering economy has often surged, has been seen as a store of value. Now that’s gone too.

“It’s a clear indication that Zimbabwe’s economy is not normal,” said Tara O’Connor, executive director at London-based Africa Risk Consulting. “The ZSE was the last facade of any normal economic activity. But in closing it, ZANU-PF locks Zimbabwe in — capital and all.”

The closing of the bourse is likely to further complicate the administration’s attempt to drag the economy out of a two-decade slump.

‘Don’t panic’
“Investors shouldn’t panic,” said Clive Mphambela, a spokesman for the Treasury. “The market will certainly reopen.”

Justin Bgoni, the chief executive officer of the exchange, said he is working on “getting this out of the way” as quickly as possible.

With his popularity waning, former President Robert Mugabe in 2000 encouraged subsistence farmers to invade the commercial farms that produced much of the country’s exports in the form of tobacco, roses and paprika. What followed was a downward economic and political spiral. A scarcity of foreign exchange hollowed out Zimbabwe’s mining and manufacturing industries as businesses struggled to buy inputs and spares. Food, at times, ran short.

The country’s central bank began printing additional bank notes to meet government costs and the currency tanked, leading to inflation of 500 billion percent in 2008 and the scrapping of the Zimbabwe dollar in 2009.

Desperate population
With an increasing proportion of the desperate population supporting the opposition, Mugabe stayed in power through a series of elections marred by violence and irregularities. While he was removed by the military in November 2017, his replacement Emmerson Mnangagwa has failed to make good on pledges to revive the economy.

Multilateral lenders such as the International Monetary Fund have refused to offer the country more money until it pays arrears on $8 billion of foreign debt and enacts promised political reforms. Food and fuel shortages are commonplace, civil servants take home a 10th of what they earned two years ago and many Zimbabweans depend on remittances from relatives who have left the country.

“Our intention is to move expeditiously in our reform program,” government spokesman Nick Mangwana said in response to questions. “But we have to face the reality that structural and cultural reforms are not an overnight event. There are always unforeseen challenges which slow down the process.”

The local currency, pegged at parity with the U.S. dollar as recently as February 2019, trades officially at 64 to the greenback, but the rate on the black market is more than 100.

Zimbabweans lay the blame firmly at the door of the government.

“They took the farms, then they looted bank accounts, then they told platinum miners to relinquish half their claims,” said John Robertson, an independent economist in Harare. “What they’re saying is we own everything and we can take it.”

© 2020 Bloomberg L.P.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Dumbabwe still still has a stock exchange?

“It’s a clear indication that Zimbabwe’s economy is not normal,” said Tara O’Connor

Unbelievable deep insights by fin gurus as usual…

Shades of a diminishing IQ.

“With his popularity waning, former President Robert Mugabe in 2000 encouraged subsistence farmers to invade the commercial farms that produced much of the country’s exports in the form of tobacco, roses and paprika. What followed was a downward economic and political spiral”.

South Africa is following this failed model.

As a farmer I and my colleagues are trying to avoid this.

Help from the city dwellers will help to. Can you imagine 60 million hungry people….I shudder.

South Africa has gone beyond the Zimbabwean model already. The ANC has gone a step further than merely grabbing the land. The ANC grabbed both the land as well as the “owner” or farmer on that land. Whereas Mugabe annexed the land only, the ANC took control of, and earns the income from, both the land and the skills of the farmer.

The farmer owns the title deed to the land, and he works day in and day out to protect and improve that land while employes people at a wage that is determined by the government. His water rights and mineral rights have been expropriated by the Government. The workers’ houses on the farm have been nationalised in effect because the government determines who may live there. The price of electricity is used to syphon the profits from the farmer to the BEE projects at Eskom. The farmer pays property taxes, CGT, income tax, vat and estate duties on his own labour and the value that he adds to the property. The harder the farmer works, the more government earns from him. The government gets the political benefits that go with food security while the farmer gets no rewards for feeding the nation.

The farmer works for the government without being paid by the government. He is a slave to the government because the government takes the profits and capital growth while the farmer earns a subsistence wage. Then they force the farmer to share his land with politically connected individuals by threatening him with full-out expropriation. They use the farmer again, to further their political agenda.

Mugabe took the land. The ANC took the land and the farmer.

Regardless of ZANU-PF destroying the country a number of times, the people are still voting for ZANU-PF.

Also the opposition and overseas election observers have been sleeping in not insisting that Zimbo’s overseas can vote. That could have changed the election outcome.

Feel sorry for Hove. But ultimately the poeples get the government they deserve.

Somewhat ungenerous Spark !! The Majority clearly fit your Description but there are the Minority (as in RSA) who can merely watch the destruction and can do little about it :

And a small minority (as in SA) of the progressives actually enabled and participated in the destruction!

Never seen such a circus-country.

Where’s it gonna end? Just a desert?

How sad it is for the millions of Zimbabwe’s people. And where exactly is the point of organizations such as SADC and the African Union (never mind the international ones)? Completely useless – they have charters and policies that do not mean a thing in the face of ongoing actions of certain governments. 50 something African countries, all repeating the same cycle of destruction since “gaining independence”.

Why even write an article. Just start with Distribution of land WITHOUT compensation = Zimbabwe

Nothing else after this can come as a shock!

I thought that Zimbabwe provided many opportunities post the Mugabe era.

A country rich in Agriculture/Natural and Mineral resources, but it keeps surprising to the negative.

Maybe time to forget about it?

ZANU PF declared war on ordinary Zimbabweans years ago and I think it is time they responded.

So guess what will happen when the stock market finally opens up? Investors will sell and run. In such a disaster of country, its best to keep funds in crypto, USD/EUR/GBP and invest outside the country. To have a bank account in Zimbabwe is a risk I am not willing not take.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: