Proposed changes to Reg 28 offer opportunities to revive the economy

Investing in infrastructure offers pension funds stable long-term returns.
SA ideally needs to invest around 30% of GDP into infrastructure to grow the economy, but is nowhere near this. Image: Shutterstock

While just about everybody contributing to a pension fund usually gets very concerned whenever changes to the so-called Reg 28 – Regulation 28 of the Pension Funds Act – are mentioned, some within the industry see the latest set of proposed amendments as a positive development that could have real long-term benefits for the country and pensioners alike.

What are the amendments to the act?

The proposed changes to Reg 28 give the pension fund industry more leeway and the opportunity to increase investment in infrastructure by increasing the proportion of funds (up to 15%) they are allowed to invest in asset classes other than the traditional top three – shares, bonds and property.

The proposed changes widen the opportunities to invest in infrastructure by referring to infrastructure as a separate asset, in contrast with the current regulation that lumps it under a group of assets called alternative assets. Pension funds could choose to do so if they believe in the asset opportunities and would not be forced to invest into infrastructure.

Johan Marnewick, Head of Credit Alternatives at Stanlib, supports the proposed amendments. “The market was anxious leading up to the announcement of draft legislation,” says Marnewick, referring to concerns that government will force pension funds to invest in certain assets by setting a minimum to invest in government bonds or infrastructure.

“That would have opened the door to prescribed assets. That the proposals rather set a ceiling, or a maximum, gives pension fund investors the freedom to choose the best investments from a range of different assets, including infrastructure.

“In fact, the industry may be comfortable with an increase in the allowance to 20%.”

Infrastructure: physical assets that grow the economy

Marnewick refers to infrastructure investment as investing in the “real” economy, where it realises the goals of economic growth and creating employment, while investors earn good returns.

“Currently, SA has an enormous capacity constraint to grow the economy. The truth is that the constrained capacity is both financial but also due to a lack of skills. The result is that our economy can only grow at around 1% to 2% per annum, at best. Investing in infrastructure can address some of these headwinds and increase capacity through financial investment and attracting and growing skills in the sector,” he says.

Infrastructure shouldn’t only refer to public infrastructure but also private infrastructure such as schools, hospitals, housing, electricity installations, fibre networks, communications, cellphone towers and many other examples of assets that are needed to make economic activity possible.

“We have had chronic underinvestment in these real assets that promote economic growth and it’s stifling the potential within the economy.”

Infrastructure is a suitable long-term investment proposition

Currently in South Africa often banks and private equity funds are financing infrastructure projects.

“Bank funding for these projects results in a mismatch in liabilities and assets for bank balance sheets – causing them to have to hold more expensive capital and other liquidity buffers. Investing in infrastructure is a long-term endeavour. In contrast, life companies that underwrite retirement products and pension funds have longer dated liabilities which they should match to longer-term investments. The retirement industry is much better placed to finance infrastructure,” says Marnewick, adding that it comes down to bringing longer term providers of capital closer to where it is needed, resulting in more efficient outcomes for the economy as a whole.

In addition, he points out that there are several other benefits in recognising infrastructure as an asset class for pension fund investors, including access to a wider range of investment opportunities and a lower-risk outcome through more diversification away from traditional assets which seem expensive at the moment.

Private investors – in partnership with the public

Marnewick points to the fact that the private sector is already the largest investor in infrastructure in SA.

“Ideally we need to invest around 30% of GDP into infrastructure to grow the economy. We are nowhere near this,” he says.

“We dropped from 20% five years ago to 18%. Government contributed 5%, with the private sector making up the other 13%. Ideally a partnership is needed between the public and private sectors, however the public sector’s contributions don’t have to be in the form of capital, but can be in the form of the necessary regulations to allow the private sector access to public assets or services.”

Marnewick refers to the success achieved with regards to renewable energy projects, which have to date attracted over R200 billion in investment and created around 40 000 jobs during the construction of the various wind farms and solar array installations.

Transforming South Africa for the better

Marnewick believes it is in all South Africans’ longer-term best interests to grow and modernise the economy. Government’s contribution doesn’t have to be financial, but through regulations that foster and attract real investment

“The pension fund industry can be part of the solution here,” he says.

Cautioning against ever-present investment risks, he says pension funds can avail themselves of the expertise and experience that already exists in the fund management industry to avoid the obvious pitfalls.

“Once investments start to flow, the jobs, skills development and long-term wealth creation will follow.”

Stanlib Asset Management is an authorised Financial Services Provider.

Brought to you by Stanlib Asset Management.

Moneyweb does not endorse any product or service being advertised in sponsored articles on our platform.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Two constraints mentioned. Financial and skills.

What is the point of “investing” money into this “asset” without addressing the skills constraint?? Should the latter not be addressed first in a real proper working economy??

The anc has no intention of addressing the skills constrained as Cyril said BEE is here to stay.

So be as patriotic as you want with your pension.

Its just an anc con job.

As a member of the GEPF I can live with the proposed 15 percent cap. It was the previous, thinly veiled threat of wholesale looting of my future that scared the tripe out of me.

Don’t see it as a cap, but as an opened tap. It just means they can steal 15% of your asset value at a time, and when that is marked down to its true value (zero), they can start over again. I’m not being pessimistic, this is completely sane and realistic. Bottom line is that South Africans don’t want to pay for their services, and for those services that do get provided (at inflated tender prices), they have no qualms about rioting and looting and burning it to the ground.

Maybe a few more roads like the one Malema’s company built that is disintegrating

Well, if that is how it is, it is how it is! I would prefer then that they give private tenders to generate electricity which is the first point to address for economic activity. Give licenses to let’s say 5 private companies where the Pension Funds can invest into, we build together new power stations and share in the profit of said privately owned power stations. Now we are talking business!

This sounds very much like a politicla brown-nosing article from Stablib to try to lobby for favour for its own interests.

Who paid this traitor-to-the-truth to lie for the ANC? Theft is not investment.

End of comments.



Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: