Proudly sponsored by

The growing impact of coronavirus on the global economy

As the human costs in China and other countries continue to rise, the virus is also taking its toll on different industrial sectors.
Image: Paul Yeung/Bloomberg

As of March 6, 2020, the number of people infected with the coronavirus Covid-19 has surpassed 99 000, with nearly 3 400 deaths. Efforts to contain the outbreak have led to full or partial quarantines of several Chinese provinces and cities, as well as other countries that have been hit. The movement restrictions that have been implemented currently affect 500 million people.

As the human costs in China and other countries continue to rise, the virus is also taking its toll on different industrial sectors – and subdued demand and disrupted supply across industries increase uncertainty over the global economy.

SARS vs Covid-19

This is the second time in the past 20 years that China is facing contagion coming from the corona virus family. In 2002, SARS epidemic took 800 lives and infected 8,000 people. Although economic impact of SARS was difficult to assess, a 2004 analysis indicates that the global economy experienced a loss of at least 40 billion US dollars in 2003 and a growth slowdown of 1%.

Since early 2000s, China’s economy grown enormously. CNBC

Many things changed since 2003, including the size of the Chinese economy and its position in the world. In the wake of SARS outbreak, China represented slightly over 4% of the global GDP and was the sixth largest economy in the world. Today, it contributes more than 16% of the world’s GDP and is the second economy after that of the United States.

Additionally, the country has traditionally been the biggest source of global growth – in 2019 alone its contribution surpassed 39%.

Manufacturing under distress

Globalisation positioned China at the heart of complex supply chains, as companies worldwide came to depend on supplies from their operations there. As a consequence, factory shutdowns in virus-affected provinces have resulted in shocks across a wide range of industries.

The South Korean carmaker Hyundai was the first firm outside of China to announce that it would halt production in its domestic factories as a result of component shortages. Automobile producers in Europe and the United States have also warned they too will soon start running out of components.

Many global markets are highly dependent on electronic components’ supplies from China. Financial Times

The impact is similar in the technology sector, as China is the leading exporter of electronic components, with nearly 30% of the global export market. Disruptions in deliveries are particularly harmful for countries highly dependent on electronic supplies from China. For example, in 2019 Japan imported more than 45 billion dollars’ worth of Chinese electrical and electronic goods.

Commodity markets face volatility

China is also the largest importer of raw materials, and commodity markets are consequently feeling the impact as well. The International Energy Agency (IEA) expects that global oil demand growth in 2020 will be 30% lower than originally expected – instead of 1.2 million of barrels per day as previously estimated, it will rise only by 825,000 barrels per day.

Similarly, the decline of the industrial activity in China has beena shock to the copper market, as the country represents half of global demand. Copper is used in a wide range of industries, including automobiles, mobile phones and domestic appliances. Falling cross-sector sales have resulted in Chinese traders postponing or outright canceling contracts with suppliers from Latin America and Africa, citing “force majeure” clauses – events beyond their control.

Plummeting demand, rising concerns

On the demand side, the impact is already being felt in the travel and tourism industry. The airline sector is expected to have a loss in revenue rising up to 29 billion US dollars this year, as demand for air travel declines for the first time in the last 11 years.

Chinese tourists represent the largest group of outbound global travellers. They favour Asian-Pacific countries – the top three destinations are Hong Kong, Macao and Thailand – and in 2019, Thailand welcomed approximately 10 million visitors from China, representing 30% of its arrivals. Since the outbreak, Thai officials estimate that around 1.3 million visits have been cancelled for February and March alone.

Tourism sector across Asia-pacific region is highly dependent on Chinese tourists. CNN

For the time being, the impact on European tourism is relatively limited. While Paris annually hosts around 800,000 Chinese tourists, this represents only 3% of all tourist visits. However, concerns are raising over the fact that Chinese often travel in groups, with a specific choice of hotels that are now facing vacancies. Similar trends are reported in other European countries such as Germany, Spain and Austria.

A particular passion of Chinese travellers is luxury retail. Since the early 2000s, the country’s shoppers have developed a taste for high-end products and represented for 33% market share for personal luxury goods in 2018, a share that is – or was – projected to rise to 46% by 2025. The industry is now facing its biggest challenge since 2008, as major luxury groups such as Kerring, LVMH and Tiffany become increasingly dependent on rising Chinese demand.

What lies ahead?

What happens next will largely depend on how the Covid-19 crisis evolves. In the best-case scenario, the virus will be contained in the near future or start slowing down in the early spring. People will resume work in China and industrial activity will pick up again. That should bring relief to the Chinese economy and the globe-spanning businesses that depend on it. The lagging demand will likely bounce back relatively quickly, particularly with the help of tailored government measures.

If the virus continues to spread across China, East Asia and other world regions, however, uncertainty and disruption will increase. Movement restrictions would continue and supply chains that are currently temporarily disrupted would decompose entirely, and factory shutdowns would inevitably follow, not just in China but also other markets. Some companies might consider revising their supply chains to find alternatives for China, but experience shows that that’s easier said than done.The Conversation

Jovana Stanisljevic, professor in International Business, Department People, Organisation, Society, Grenoble École de Management (GEM)

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


What a fantastic buying opportunity. A disease with mild flu-like symtoms breaks out and the world acts as if its Armageddon. Please man….so over this media driven hysteria. How many people die hourly from pnemonia, TB, ebola, HIV etc….where is the panic???? Buy buy buy…

The problem is COVID19 has a much higher mortality rate than the seasonal flu, sure its killed less people, but that’s just because not that many people have been infected.

If you take the 2% mortality rate of COVID19 vs the 0.1 of the normal flu, if the same number of people that caught the flu caught COVID19 instead, instead of 40K Deaths last year it would have been 800K deaths (That’s a 20 fold increase in annual deaths) so yeah.

Its like saying: Plane accidents are not that bad, how many people die annually in plane accidents? Of course that’s only because plane accidents are quite rare, but when they happen they are usually extremely fatal.

The point being, figures and stats claiming the “end of the world scenario” were quoted by media during SARS outbreak, ebola outbreak, swine flu, avian flu etc etc. Always dooms day scenarios…and yet years later here we are. But hey, it’s your money. If you want to stick it under the mattress and miss out on great buys, go for it. I’m going with Buffet who last week said he was looking for buying opportunities….this too shall pass.

The bottom line is, regardless of whether the virus is as bad as the media is making it out to be or its not bad at all and the media have blown it out of proportion..the markets are still reacting to this.

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: