You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

11 months later, Nersa postpones IPP investigation

Eskom pleads ‘communication challenges’.
Nersa urged Eskom to adhere to the new timeframe following a two-week postponement of the hearings. Picture: Moneyweb

The South African Wind Energy Association (SAWEA) has slammed Eskom for delaying an investigation into its refusal to sign power purchase agreements (PPAs) with renewable independent power producers (IPPs).

It also objected strongly to energy regulator Nersa’s refusal to open the hearing on the matter scheduled for Thursday to the public.

SAWEA declared a dispute with Eskom in October last year, and requested that Nersa investigate Eskom’s failure to sign PPAs with the preferred bidders in the Department of Energy’s Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement (REIPPP) programme.

Nersa in March this year launched a formal investigation into the matter and a hearing was scheduled for Thursday for both parties to make submissions.

SAWEA said in a statement that the hearing began “on two disappointing notes: Firstly, Eskom arrived with a plea for postponement, citing ‘communications challenges’ that had prevented the national utility from adequately preparing its submissions, both written and verbal, despite several correspondences between Nersa and the parties, clearly indicating the timeframes to be adhered to. Secondly, Nersa had declared the hearing closed to the public, and would not allow members of media who had arrived, to join the hearing.”

Journalists from Moneyweb and Carte Blanche were not allowed into the meeting and were not afforded an opportunity to motivate why the meeting should be open.

SAWEA said it objected strongly to both these points, arguing that “Eskom had had a total of eleven months to take the necessary steps to engage with this matter”, and that refusing to open the hearing to the public would be inconsistent with constitutional principles of openness, transparency and fairness, as well as Nersa’s own legislation.

Eventually the hearing was postponed by two weeks. “It is worth noting that Nersa cautioned Eskom to adhere to this timeframe, given the prejudice already suffered by those whose interests SAWEA represents,” the organisation said.

SAWEA said it was “disappointed that the national utility had not taken seriously the major negative effects of the ongoing delay on South Africa’s young renewable energy industry. It is an indication of the depth of poor governance at Eskom, that such a serious matter has suffered the fate of being a casualty of ‘communications challenges’ at this state-owned enterprise”.

SAWEA said the reasons provided by Eskom for its refusal to honour duly procured power purchases must surely be deemed to be in the national interest. “SAWEA hopes that Nersa will recognise that accountability, through transparency, is the cornerstone of our Constitution. Matters of such grave national interest such as the dispute declared by SAWEA should not be considered behind closed doors,” the organisation said.




Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


“Communications challenges?” Gosh!

Probably can’t get hold of a crooked enough spin doctor ….

these delays are deliberate to frustrate the Wind Power producers. I would not be surprised if they with draw their bids and take their proposals and capital elsewhere. Just what Escom wants, to lie to the country again about shortages, blackmail us into paying more. They are as dirty as the ANC, filth.

Electricity is expensive as it is. How will a family in the mid income group going to survive once the new IPPs come in?

So here’s what is going to happen – not to the IPP’s specifically, I mean in general: The middle class is going to install grid-tied solar.
This does away with batteries, which are expensive, bulky and have a limited lifespan.
Cost for a system for a typical 3-bedroom house would be less than R50k, but say R60k max.
It pays itself off in 3 to 4 years.
Thereafter, free electricity for the remaining life of the plant, say the following 6 to 12 years.
Once off the grid, consumers never go back. They just upgrade their solar.
If Nersa changes the rules and outlaws grid-tied systems, we bite the bullet and add the batteries.

So Eskom, which currently produces less electricity than in 2001, but with twice the staff and at three times the cost, can then ask Nersa for a 200% annual increase for all we care. Happiness.

You are right. The only clients who will still be doing business with Eskom will be those municipalities who don’t pay their bills. Then Eskom will be exactly where SAA is now….bankrupt. NERSA is merely postponing the inevitable implosion of this vehicle that enriches cronies and cadres by looting honest people.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: