Alexkor – the wannabe diamond miner

Diamonds are prized by arms dealers, money launderers and crooks.
The state-owned miner has been shrouded in controversy due to its links to the Guptas, gross mismanagement and managerial incompetence. Picture: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg

UPDATE: In a previous version of this article, Moneyweb stated in regard to Dr K.O.P. Matseke, that he is “a business associate of Gupta lieutenant Salim Essa”. 

Moneyweb based this statement on CIPC records and a prospectus filed with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), from which it appears that during the period December 2010 until February 2013, Dr Matseke was a co-director with Salim Essa in a company called Moxisign.

Dr Matseke subsequently informed Moneyweb that he has no knowledge of the prospectus filed with the American SEC, nor did he authorise its publication. He informed us that he is not a business associate of Salim Essa. The statement that Dr Matseke is a “business associate” of Salim Essa is retracted.

Alexkor, the state-owned diamond miner, is struggling under the weight of managerial incompetence, non-profitable concessions, the plight of the Richtersveld Community, an accumulated loss of R78.7 million, and is carrying out its operations through middle men who may very well be scraping off the glitter.

To compound any speculation as to whether Alexkor has been captured, the rumours of the alleged link to the Guptas and a suitcase of diamonds being smuggled out the country will not go away. The chairperson of Alexkor, Hantse Matseke (aka Hantsi Bhetilda Mayeza), is said to be a long-time ally of Ace Magashule. She is also the chairperson of the Free State Development Corporation). 

Diamonds are easily hidden, transportable, and can gain value in the eyes of a smitten buyer looking for a good deal. They are hence prized by arms dealers, money launderers and crooks. Alexkor is an ideal entity to be manipulated by those who are canny and wily.

The external auditors, SizweNtsalubaGobodo, qualified the 2017 financial statements as follows:

  • Procurement processes as required by Public Finance Management Act were not followed.
  • Contracts were not awarded to bidders in line with the Preferential Procurement Policy Framework Act.
  • The “accounting authority”, in other words the directors, did not investigate the irregular, fruitless and wasteful expenditure incurred in prior years. In 2017 this amounted to R17.9 million.
  • The 2017 financial statements were not properly prepared, and the external auditors had to correct these and obtain supporting documents. In my view, this taints the auditors, and they cannot claim to be an independent third party.
  • The accounting authority (the directors) “did not exercise effective oversight responsibility over certain policies and procedures relating to supply chain management, performance management, revenue, compliance, and related internal controls”.
  • Management did not implement proper record keeping, nor did they prepare regular performance reports.

Alexkor is facing many other problems which should be investigated:

  • In 2008 the Richtersveld Community (RVC) successfully laid claim to the land under the Restitution of Land Rights Act. The land mining rights will be transferred to the community, while Alexkor is to retain its marine mining rights. The Pooling and Sharing joint venture (PSJV) was only signed on April 7 2011. Forty-nine percent is owned by the Richtersveld Community and 51% by Alexkor. The problems in regard to the implementation of the Alexkor Deed of Settlement Agreement have not been resolved, and the Select Committee on Communications and Public Enterprises are considering placing the Richtersveld land restitution claim under administration. (Richtersveld Community & Alexkor Deed of Settlement implementation: progress report by Public Enterprises February 21 2018).
  • In looking for new business ventures, Alexkor stated in its “Material issues and risk” report that it will acquire an equity stake in a coal beneficiation plant (approved by Lynne Browne), as well as build relationships with state-owned entities like Eskom, Transnet and mining companies.
  • Alexkor does not appear to be in possession of a geological model to inform decision-making, nor does it appear to have an idea of the life of the current diamond reserves.
  • The Richtersveld Community is dependent on mining. As the destroyer of the environment, it is incumbent on Alexkor to think beyond mining as a source of income for the community, for example, the establishment of fish farming. The rehabilitation of the environment includes removing asbestos contaminated material from Alexander Bay and properly storing hazardous waste.
  • In mining diamonds from the seabed, which is 80% of the business, Alexkor enters into contracts with marine miners and divers. The deep sea mining contract with International Mining and Dredging South Africa (IMDSA) provides for an 85:15 diamond haul split in favour of IMDSA. Giving up 85% of the diamond take is extraordinary.
  • Alexkor appointed Scarlet Sky Investments as its diamond cutters, polishers, and marketers. Beach and land diamonds achieved an average of $548.27 (2016: $602.02) per carat. However, IMDSA diamonds only achieved an average price of $248.03.
  • Alexkor’s action plan for addressing insufficient operational cash is to seek approval for releasing rehabilitation funds.
  • Alexkor incurred a R2.9 million penalty in cancelling the lease of its premises in Rosebank. This reportable irregularity was condoned by Lynne Browne. Its new head office in Woodmead costs nearly R3 million a year. Why does Alexkor require an office which is 1 388 kilometres from the mine?
  • There is a R129.2 million shortfall in the rehabilitation fund, and the board of directors placed this money in short-term investments. The board has requested a state guarantee to fund the shortfall. This is in contravention of the Minerals and Petroleum Resources Development Act 2002, and this reportable irregularity was reported to the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors.
  • Alexkor’s assessed tax loss of R202 million and unutilised capital expenditure of R105.5 million puts it at risk of corporate predators, though this is somewhat negated by the environmental rehabilitation liability of R260 million.
  • Putting in place a proper systems of internal control, procurement, tender processes and financial management are paramount.

The 2018 financial statements are to be submitted for auditing on the May 31. There is much to be audited.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Alexcor is a den of thieves! It always has been and the latest crowd would have stolen more if there was more to steal. The best thing the government could do is privatise it and get royalties and taxes from it and stop loosing money and insuring larger and larger liabilities! Put it out on a competitive bid process under the watchful eye of Pravin G and see what happens. Maybe the Richtersveld land is the first place to “test” the constitution and take the land without compensation!

My boring tune is that Pravin G does not care one jot. A skim off from the looted cash probably threads its way through all the rotten veins of the ANC cadres to the top and the party itself.

The auditors findings reads like a slide show of all possible eff ups. why don’t we get these guys to rather start running spaza shops first and then see from there ?

In other words – Alexkor is a zamma-zamma.

Yes, a zama zama sponsered by the taxpayer.

The only thing in this that is a worse loss than the capture of Alexcor Mine is the incompetence of the auditors whose primary reason for existence is to prevent this sort of loss happening.

Ultimately the taxpayers pay for restitution. So I reckon that, as the auditors allowed the thieves (guptas et al) to escape, the taxpayer has the right to hold the auditors to account. the only authority above the auditors is the Independent Regulatory Board for Auditors.

Then where do we stop? The police/Hawks? The NPA? the Mines minister? Pravin Gordhan? The President Ramaphosa? Who else? Are they all allowing this?

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: