You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

As Eskom takes Koeberg 1 offline, can it keep the lights on?

Load shedding last week is not a great indicator….
Image: Dwayne Senior, Bloomberg

Eskom has taken unit one of Koeberg offline earlier than planned for scheduled maintenance, after “an increasing leak rate was observed on one of three steam generators”. The unit had been scheduled to be taken offline for refuelling and routine maintenance starting in February. Eskom says it expects the unit “to return to service during May 2021”.

Read: Eskom unprepared as generator leak accelerates nuclear shutdown

Koeberg supplies stable and predictable baseload power generation of just more than 1 800 megawatts (MW), which halved after 6pm on Sunday evening when the unit was taken offline (yellow in the chart below). Of concern is the fact that it now has to replace the ±900MW shortfall, especially during the evening peak.

Source: Eskom Data Portal

It continues to use pumped storage schemes – designed for peak periods – for baseload power generation. On Sunday, for example, it used these to generate between 500MW and 1 800MW throughout the day. Once Koeberg 1 was removed from the grid, the usage of these peaked at 2 071MW (at 7pm). Pumped storage schemes are net consumers of power in that they use more electricity to operate than each unit of power they produce. This is what makes them such effective peaking plants – ‘excess’ power is used to pump water uphill overnight when demand is low.

Last week – historically the lowest-demand period of the year (lockdown level five, excluded) – the utility was forced to implement Stage 2 load shedding overnight. It said this was to “preserve its emergency generation reserves”. From its publicly available dashboards, it is clear that Eskom simply did not have sufficient headroom overnight to use baseload power to replenish its pumped storage schemes (which it was using to augment baseload power throughout the day).

Source: Eskom Data Portal

From its unplanned outage dashboard, it is clear that these outages spiked from around the 9 000MW level towards 12 000MW between December 28 and December 30. It would typically be able to cope with this number of plant breakdowns (and partial losses), but it has deliberately ramped up planned maintenance to the highest level in at least a year. A total in excess of 9 000MW of capacity was taken out of service last week as the utility continues to catch up on maintenance which was simply not done in past years.

As plant breakdowns spiked, from its own data one can see that Eskom was forced into using its open cycle gas turbines (OCGT) overnight on Monday (December 28). Usage of these peaked at more than 1 300MW before it made the unprecedented call to implement load shedding. During the evening peak on December 29, it also made use of interruptible load supply (ILS) where it cut nearly 700MW from its large industrial customers. It did this again during the evening peaks on December 30 and 31. On December 30, it called on the independent operators of gas peaking plants to augment supply (in addition to its own OCGT usage of around 1 000MW).

Of further concern is that Eskom has been relying on approximately 1 000MW (and as much as 1 300MW) of so-called “non-commercial generation” capacity since December 23. These are units at Kusile (units 2 and 3) and Medupi (unit 1) that are not yet in commercial operation. In the week prior, it used none of these units. The two Kusile units are slated to achieve commercial operation this month (unit 2, 800MW) and in March (unit 3, 800MW) which will go some way to alleviating the generation shortfall. However, all of this capacity is not actually available. The utility identified design defects at both new power plants in November 2018 and work has begun to remedy these.

Now, with the 900MW shortfall from taking the one unit at Koeberg offline, Eskom will be forced into recalculating its generation plan. It always planned on having these additional units available in early 2021 (plus this doesn’t really change the supply picture as it has been able to call on these units in a similar way to other plants in its fleet).

It really only has two levers to work with: some planned maintenance can be deferred (although this is partly why the utility has such an unreliable coal fleet to begin with), and it can use emergency generation capacity (OCGTs) to meet peak demand.

This is the balancing act it will need to perform for the coming weeks as demand ramps up from the 25 000/26 000MW level now towards 29 000MW by mid-month. By the end of this week, those figures are already forecast to be between 26 000 and 27 000MW (the difference between so-called residual demand and contracted demand is made up by renewables).

Before the forced Koeberg outage, Eskom’s official three-month outlook looked manageable. In its planned risk level, with unplanned outages of 12 000MW plus a 2 200MW operating reserve, it may be slightly short at certain peaks in the week. It is able to work around this with its available emergency generation resources (pumped storage schemes, its own OCGTs as well as IPP diesel/gas peaking plants and ILS).

Source: Eskom system status report week 52 2020

The only way Eskom avoids load shedding is to give itself more headroom (by doing less planned maintenance, which is unlikely) or by ensuring (read: hoping) that it can keep unplanned breakdowns well below the 12 000MW level. We’ll known whether it’s chosen the former once its weekly system status reports for this week and next are published.

It’s going to be difficult few months.

COMMENTS   12

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Eskom is a ‘transformed’ entity so why are people concerned about its performance?

Colson, must agree
When the lights go off, my invertor and battery bank take over.. transformation full circle!!! Viva !!

If you take cost of Pylontech battery and equate over life cycle of battery and kwh stored, the cost are already +_ 60% of escom, so why do we need escom’s poor service

If by ‘transformed’ you mean returning to the historical mean and reverting to pre-colonial times, then you are absolutely correct. Rubbing sticks together to make a fire will be the new (old) Eskom. Its simply how Africa is

Can’t keep the lights on.
Can’t grow the economy
Can’t balance the fiscal books
Can’t keep corruption under control
Can’t keep looting in check
Can’t pay for the vaccines in time
Can’t plan for or procure vaccines properly
Can’t manage the lockdown effectively
Can’t get crime under control
However CAN come up with endless excuses.

how can they achieve the above, if they don’t even know what a dustbin or stop sign is used for????

can’t control the borders!

This can be mitigated by going to level 5 lockdown. The anc can then blame the virus or something for their nincompoopery.

TSK!!!!

LOL- I can smell lots of braai time coming !!

I beg to differ…..you can braai without meat but you can’t braai without beer… 😉

You can always drink beer if you brew your own: boerbier.com

Got lots of beer !!!

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: