Eskom’s official three-month outlook for demand and generating capacity shows a high likelihood of load shedding every single week until mid-April.
In fact, for six of the coming 13 weeks, it forecasts that it will “definitely” be between 1 000 megawatts (MW) and 2 000MW short to meet its reserve margin and “possibly demand”.
Using the assumption of a total of 12 000MW of breakdowns, its “planned risk” level is effectively guaranteeing some load shedding in these weeks. In the second week of February, the worst of the coming 13 weeks, it is forecasting to be at least 2 000MW short to meet demand.
This comes as the utility was forced to implement Stage 2 load shedding from midday on Thursday as it lost four generation units (two at Kusile and one each at Kriel and Duvha). Beyond this, it had a further four units whose “return to service from planned maintenance” was “delayed”. This saw unplanned outages spike to 14 748MW, nearly 3 000MW higher than its long-term assumption of 12 000MW used in its planning. It is these spikes in breakdowns that necessitate load shedding.
Eskom announced on Sunday that load shedding would reduce to Stage 1 from 11pm on Sunday to 5am on Monday, then resume at Stage 2 until further notice.
It said it would provide a further update on Monday.
Typically, the utility is able to augment peak demand with its peaking power plants, either via pumped storage schemes or open cycle gas turbines (OCGTs) which burn diesel.
To meet the 7pm peak on Thursday (the highest in a while), it met around 29 000MW of demand by using the following additional sources:
- 1 323MW of its own OCGTs from 10 units
- 1 263MW of pumped water generation
- Around 2 000MW of manual load reduction (load shedding)
- 266MW of interruption of supply (IOS) to large customers; it often calls this “virtual power station”.
It also utilised just less than 1 500MW of supply from renewable sources, primarily wind.
Read: SA’s energy policies: Are changes finally coming?
On Thursday night, its coal fleet was only producing 20 408MW of power. Contrast that with Monday night’s peak (7pm) where its coal fleet was producing 22 371MW, and one can easily see the huge problem.
Eskom’s generation issues have been compounded by it being forced to take unit one of Koeberg offline earlier than planned for scheduled maintenance after “an increasing leak rate was observed on one of three steam generators”.
Originally, it was to take this unit offline for refuelling and routine maintenance in February. It expects the unit to “return to service during May 2021” meaning that a shortfall of this 900MW of dependable, baseload supply will persist until the start of winter.
‘Non-commercial generation’ capacity
In the first week of January, it relied on between 1 139MW and 1 445MW of so-called “non-commercial generation” capacity during each evening peak.
Because of the precarious generation picture, one can assume it is using some of these units (Kusile 2 and 3 and Medupi 1) throughout the day.
Two of these units are set to achieve commercial operation in the next three months. By mid-April, Eskom says it will have 43 858MW of dispatchable capacity from the roughly 40 000MW currently. Still, with this increase in capacity it is still forecasting supply constraints, which means likely load shedding.
At this point, it can reduce the amount of planned maintenance by deferring certain work to give itself more headroom, but this is the primary reason it’s in this position to begin with. The utility has done too little maintenance for about a decade as successive executives focused on keeping the lights on at all costs.
Chief executive Andre de Ruyter has been clear that he intends to break this cycle, as this is the only way that Eskom’s fleet reliability will improve over time.
At this stage, the amount of planned maintenance over the next three months remains at the level it forecast in the first week of January. Moneyweb will monitor this closely for any changes.
Critical to avoiding load shedding is the utility trying to keep unplanned breakdowns to below 12 000MW. However, because most of its coal fleet is old and unreliable, when units break down it has to run those units that are operating harder to try and boost supply. Often, this results in further trips and outages which is why Eskom typically takes many days to recover from load shedding.
Capacity unavailability
From Eskom’s own publicly available dashboard, a total of 43% of its capacity is unavailable due to breakdowns, planned maintenance, and “other outages” so far this month.
This is the highest in at least two years.
There are however a few bright spots in this data …
So far for January, 23.9% of Eskom’s generation fleet is unavailable due to breakdowns. This sounds high – it is – but it is significantly lower than the 27.9% of unplanned outages across the fleet in January last year and 29.2% in February 2020.
Additionally, Eskom is doing 50% more planned maintenance this January (15.3% of its fleet so far this month, versus 10.3% in 2020).
Since September, this number has been 13% or higher (as much as 17.6% in December), compared to 2019 where maintenance barely exceeded 10% of capacity for much of the year.
This is a very good sign.
Listen to Nompu Siziba’s interview with energy analyst Roger Lilley:
COMMENTS 27
You must be signed in to comment.
SIGN IN SIGN UP
One wonders if businesses have adapted through the years of load shedding? Especially large users like smelters etc.
But it seems as if Mr.de Ruyter have not really improved Eskom at all. We still have load shedding and debt and all those things.
Vote 53
The ANC are styming de Ryter
Vote 48
Correct.We all knew that
It was just another window dressing excercise to fool us
I don’t see him staying on much longer
Vote 35
Minister Gwede must rather stick to organising family weddings and union meetings.
Vote 30
De ruyter is a puppet on a string for eskom.
Vote 10
Dear Moneyweb please go and download Eskom system adequacy report published in the same place as you found this data.
If you read that one all the way to the end it seems that load shedding is likely to continue until 2025 on a regular basis unless.
Our only option install PV and batteries as everything else is out of our hands
Vote 2
Eskom is just assisting the ANC in the rapid scheduled destruction of the SA industries and economy!! Viva !!!
Vote 57
Its called Transformation.
They have transformed South Africa and making good progress, no economic yard stick can disprove the fact that they are achieving their goals and objectives.
More money than ever is flowing to BEE Schemes, providing value to the 1000 black industrialists whilst the a greater area of land control is given to Traditional Leaders with their 10 kings and Queens who are given fair value salaried and laws over their land.
https://businesstech.co.za/news/government/384995/how-much-south-africas-kings-queens-and-traditional-leaders-are-paid/
The White Monopoly Capital is leaving South Africa exactly as the anc have planned.
After all democracy is just a word and so is Freedom & Rights.
Vote 38
In winter the load shedding gets worse.
This is part of the diabolical situation we have the ANC to thank for.
ANC are just a conglomerate of thieves.
Vote 76
Easy to fix this.
Non payers=switch off.
Vote 56
No modern economy can survive load-shedding. No modern economy can survive constant lockdown measures. No modern economy can survive a socialist/communist government. No economy can survive when all the SOEs and most of the municipalities are bankrupt. No economy van survive when the majority of voters have the right to extort financial support from a small minority of taxpayers.
The struggling entrepreneurs and the remaining taxpayers are the real heroes in this country. They do not get the credit and respect they deserve.
Vote 128
No modern economy can survive the cANcer……
Vote 46
True. To the the north and the electricity scenario is much the same. The political parties still remain.
Vote 23
Correction!
We WERE a modern economy
The wonderful thieving ANC have reduced us to a rathole of Junk
Once the pride of Sub Saharan Africa, now just another failed African State, and they continue unabated with little or no resistance
It’s so sad
Vote 28
we are pretty f…… far from a MODERN economy. For people that doesn’t believe in the evolution theory the ” de-evolution ” of RSA should be the dire evidence!
Vote 23
COVID-19 doesn’t scare me but ANC-2021 terrifies me. Like locusts, they consume everything and leave a wasteland behind
Vote 47
Sounds like were screwed
Vote 13
In 13 years of loadshedding not a single Eskom employee has been disciplined, let alone fired.
It is thoroughly naive to discount deliberate destruction as a prime cause of loadshedding.
We have seen vandalism everywhere “stakeholders” have “grievances”: long haul trucks; the railways; health, road and school infrastructure; and during industrial action fomented by untouchable unions.
Loadshedding is the ransom we pay if the ANC’s alliance and blessing partners are not obliged.
Vote 84
Eskom is a mirror image of our inept and incompetent government – both striving to destroy the economy. The government can’t see that if they destroy the economy there will be no funding of social projects and no feeding schemes and anarchy will reign by the “have nots”
Vote 59
Let’s not forget that Mantashe has apparently failed to lift his pen and approve the roll-out of new renewable sources which would help the situation tremendously. The utter uselessness of this government simply beggars belief.
Vote 60
My earlier post says that uncle Gwede should organise family weddings and union meetings.
Vote 14
Whats the photo for? Does Eskom have a helicopter to fly the CEO around…
Vote 17
I think that this link sums it up better than I ever could:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w4xx-su0un8
Vote 12
Back to their old tricks
Vote 8
In a civilized country the government would be voted out of office just due to its actions and inactions regarding its 100% owned electricity producer.
Here , despite theft and human abuse on an unheard of scale(starvation, no water, crime, poor housing , education, police etc) , the government is returned to power every 5 years and what votes it loses goes to the red beret gang.
Doesn’t that say everything?
Flee while you can!
Vote 16
..15.3% of its fleet so far this month, versus 10.3% in 2020..
Yeah, 50% from a low base is virtually nothing.
My cup runneth over from the good news.
May I switch on an extra LED light tonight?
Vote 8
Could somebody explain why in the May to August period we always get away with none or minimal loadshedding despite the higher demand then. Yes I know they do most or all planned maintenance in spring and summer.
Vote 2
Load All 27 Comments
End of comments.