Broke Eskom has to cough up to fight theft, vandalism

Maintenance deferred due to budget constraints.
The numbers disclosed at the utility’s quarterly system update bring the direct spend resulting from criminality to a quarter of a billion rand. Image: AdobeStock

While struggling to scrape money together for maintenance work on its ageing coal-fired power stations, Eskom has had to fork out R48 million “and counting” in this financial year to fight theft and vandalism on its transmission network.

Since April 1 last year 2 752 incidents were recorded, with the cost totalling R200 million.

These numbers, disclosed at the utility’s quarterly system update on Thursday, bring the direct spend resulting from criminality to a quarter of a billion rand.

It has appointed several security companies to provide 450 pairs of boots on the ground, drones equipped with infrared sensors, and intelligent cameras that can alert control rooms at its key sites of anything untoward.

Eskom has referred the alleged sabotage in November last year of a crucial pylon at its Lethabo-power station to the Hawks, whose infrastructure task team is investigating the matter.


An investigation continues regarding an incident of possible sabotage shortly before that, when an extension cord was dropped on a transformer at Matimba. This caused three units to trip and led to load shedding.

Critical factor – funding

Eskom group executive for generation Phillip Dukashe flagged timeous and adequate outage funding as a critical factor to ensure the recovery of the struggling coal fleet.

He said the Eskom fleet’s availability so far this financial year is a mere 62.9%, which is way below the target set for Eskom by government as its shareholder, of 74%.

It is also a significant deterioration from the 65.2% recorded in the previous financial year.

The big culprit is unplanned breakages, with the Tutuka, Kendal and Duvha power stations contributing 46% of these outages.

Dukashe said of the 84 outages planned for the current financial year only 33 have been completed.

Nine are currently being executed, 12 have been deferred but are still scheduled for this financial year, and 28 have been deferred to the next financial year – after which there will be two remaining.

Source: Eskom

The biggest challenges causing outages to be deferred:

  • Funds;
  • Space to do it while the power system is constrained with a supply shortage of 4 000 megawatts (MW); and
  • Environmental compliance issues.

Read: Eskom’s choice: Environmental compliance at R300bn or closure of 16 000MW

Eskom CFO Calib Cassim described how difficult it is to balance the repayment of debt, operational demands and the need to do timeous maintenance when allocating budget.

He said the closer energy regulator Nersa’s determination of Eskom’s tariffs for the next financial year can be to the 20.5% increase it applied for, the better the competing demands can be met.

Dukashe warned against delaying maintenance, emphasising that it puts the system at risk.

Swings and roundabouts

Eskom group CEO André de Ruyter indicated that the generation fleet’s performance has increased substantially over the last month or two, with unplanned outages dropping to to 9 392MW from 13 000MW and more.

The utility has increased planned maintenance outages to more than 7 000MW and has committed to prioritising maintenance despite pressure on supply.

The system will however be deprived of more than 700MW of generation capacity from Medupi Unit 4, where an explosion destroyed the generator in August last year after staff ignored prescribed procedures. The unit was insured and Eskom is currently in negotiations with the insurer. The unit is only expected to return to service in August 2024.

Koeberg’s Unit 2 has been taken out of service for refuelling and to replace its steam generator. This is part of a R20 billion programme to extend the life of the nuclear power station. It will deprive the system of more than 900MW for the better part of the year and when it returns to service, the other Koeberg unit will undergo the same process.

Although the coal fleet seems to be delivering improved performance most recently, Eskom group executive for distribution Segomoco Scheppers cautioned that the elevated risk of load shedding remains while Eskom is implementing its reliability maintenance recovery programme.

Contribution from renewables

Scheppers said renewable energy currently contributes 5 901MW of generation capacity. Its best hourly performance so far was on November 1 last year, when it contributed more than 19% of energy supplied.

Its variability is however a challenge, with conventional generation having to be ramped up or down to compensate as the supply fluctuates.

The maximum variation recorded from one evening peak to the next was 1 744MW, equivalent to three large coal-fired generators, he said.

Scheppers said Eskom’s projections up to March 31 do not show any load shedding, provided the unplanned outages do not exceed 12 000MW.

With unplanned outages at 13 000MW there may be two days of Stage 1 load shedding and if it increases to 14 000MW, Eskom foresees 29 days of Stage 2 load shedding.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Sadly this heading encapsulates what South Africa is today, a country that is broke through theft vandalism and mismanagement. Nothing is going to change anytime soon and the tax and rate payer will be expected to pick up the pieces and fix it….and that is only as long as there are tax and rate payers around….a shameful indictment on the ANC who took a beautiful country and its working SOE’s and treated them with contempt!

They succeeded in destroying this country by virtue of their terrorist training !!
All we did in 1994 is to capitulate !!
Viva ANC VIVA !!

The ongoing crying fest about renewables variability is getting tired now.

1. Yes we all know and plan for the sun don’t shine at night. Yes evening renewable supply will be less. That is why we have pumped storage and need a LOT more. Those facilities are not married to coal input energy, it stores a coal electron as well as it does a green one.
2. Renewables at IPP level is around 6GW and private commercial rooftop prob another 3 GW. That is three levels of loadshed avoided versus if we were depending on Eskom Generation. Sure, it is not 24h a day but I’m pretty grateful for three levels less loadshed even half a day.
3. When Eskom breaks 12GW of coal plants on any given day (unplanned unavailability in PR speak), I don’t see these clever boys bitching and moaning about how unreliable coal is with its 12GW of variability in supply.

End of comments.




Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us: