You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Chambers reject Nersa guideline for municipal electricity tariffs

Will be devastating, say some of the biggest business chambers in the country.
Guideline will be ‘a further step towards the destruction’ of South African’s already ailing industry. Image: Moneyweb

The impact of a proposed average increase of 14.59% in the tariffs municipalities charge business and industries for electricity “on top of existing irrational and inflated municipal tariffs” will be devastating, according to some of the biggest business chambers in the country.

The Association of South African Chambers (ASAC) – which includes the Johannesburg Chamber of Commerce and Industry (JCCI) and its counterparts in Cape Town, Durban, Nelson Mandela Bay, Pietermaritzburg and the Border-Kei area of the Eastern Cape – says in a submission about the municipal guideline Nersa recently published for comment, that the implementation of the guideline will “effectively be a further step towards the destruction of the already ailing South African industry”.

Moneyweb Insider INSIDERGOLD

Subscribe for full access to all our share and unit trust data tools, our award-winning articles, and support quality journalism in the process.

Choose an option:

R63 per month
R630 per year SAVE R126

You will be redirected to a checkout page.
To view all features and options, click here.

A monthly subscription is charged pro rata, based on the day of purchase. This is non-refundable and includes a R5 once-off sign-up fee.
A yearly subscription is refundable within 14 days of purchase and includes a 365-day membership.

Click here for more information.

It calls for a fundamental change in the way municipal tariffs are determined to bring them in line with current legislation and allow them to recover only efficient cost and a reasonable return on assets.

According to ASAC, municipalities are currently abusing their position as sole distributors in their licensed areas by charging excessive tariffs “for which Nersa’s flawed guidelines are the perfect cover”.

This comes as the City of Joburg proposes a R200 fixed monthly levy for prepaid residential customers are R400 for prepaid commercial customers.

Moneyweb recently reported that middle-income households in Johannesburg on prepaid electricity are going to face steep increases in the price of electricity, should these tariffs be approved. A customer using 450 kilowatt hours (kWh) per month will see a 44% increase in the price of prepaid electricity because of the double whammy of the steeper increase in the second block of tariffs, as well as the new fixed capacity charge.

Municipalities are currently consulting stakeholders on their proposed budgets, including new service charges and tariffs that will take effect on July 1.

Once the budgets have been finalised, they still need approval from Nersa for the electricity tariffs.

Nersa is expected to finalise its tariff guideline by the end of this month and municipalities that do not exceed the guideline increase and benchmark tariffs Nersa publish generally get the go-ahead from the regulator.

According to the City of Joburg, its average increase is within the proposed guideline.

In its discussion document Nersa proposes a hybrid approach to setting electricity tariffs at municipal level to close the increasing gap between the sustainability of municipalities and affordability of tariffs for end users.

It requests stakeholders to comment on two different ways to determine municipal tariffs.

The first is based on a cost of supply study and is according to ASAC in line with legislation that allows an efficient operator to recover its cost of supply plus a reasonable return on assets. It is the same for all licencees, including Eskom.

The second, ASAC calls the historic municipal tariff methodology and has been in use by Nersa for more than a decade.

Nersa states in the discussion documents that it is aimed at municipalities that are unable to provide cost of supply studies. It translates expected revenue into tariffs. Nersa analyses the revenue forecast and compares it “with municipal costs and revenue requirements and the tariffs regulated using the Nersa benchmarks.”

Nersa uses the following performance indicators and assumes that municipalities that comply with these, will be able to run a sustainable and efficient electricity business.

Source: Nersa

ASAC rejects this and says tariff determination should be based on credible financial information. Municipalities that fail to supply such credible information are in breach of their licence conditions but Nersa fails to act against them.

“Nersa allows municipalities to be in breach of their licence conditions and Nersa exposes itself to approving tariffs not complying with the regulatory framework.

“The historic tariff methodology has been in place for well over a decade and has become engrained in the behaviour and culture of the municipalities.

“As a result, non-compliance has become deemed compliance, sanctioned by Nersa.”

According to ASAC municipalities prefer the status quo because they derive substantial hidden revenue from electricity tariffs, which boils down to surcharges.

The non-compliance and lack of transparency allow municipalities to continue to abuse the electricity income and procrastinate on systemic problems such as electricity theft. It further allows unlawful cross-subsidisation in favour of voters that keep councils in power.

This, ASAC says, is however short-sighted, amounts to abuse of power and is one of the drivers of the deindustrialisation of South Africa.

The organisation says to keep the historic tariff methodology as an option for municipalities, nothing will change, and municipalities will remain non-compliant.

It calls on Nersa to proceed with a proposal it made last year but was then abandoned. Back then it proposed to use Eskom’s retail tariffs as benchmarks when municipalities failed to provide a reliable cost of supply data.

That, it says, would “at least lead to tariffs that have a base of cost reflectivity”.

COMMENTS   5

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Municipalities need to stop electrity theft and collect outstanding debt on non payed bills.

Impossible for them. It would require competent and hard working staff. They simply dont exist.

No need for municipalities any more. Let them cut salaries with 14%.

& all of this on top of Union demands for wage increases far exceeding the remotely possible

We must get to clear national retail tariffs. If a council has a specific issue it can nominate a very clear extra levy. For example, for next four years everybody pays 5c/kWh extra toward funding the sewer system upgrade, or a clinic or whatever.

People won’t mind if the issue is transparent and they know that the levy will go away.

If we don’t go for nationally standardised tariffs:

1. Councils tariffs are now approaching effective price where it is on par with diesel. That is beyond absurd.
2. When Eskom unbundles, businesses will relocate to areas serviced by Eskom Distribution and councils will lose 100% of that revenue.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: