Proudly sponsored by

Comair planes grounded indefinitely over safety concerns

24-hour flight suspension over the weekend has been extended indefinitely after the airline failed to address all safety issues raised by the regulator.
Image: Supplied

What was supposed to be a 24-hour grounding of Comair planes over safety issues on Saturday (March 12) was extended indefinitely on Sunday following the airline failing to address findings communicated to it by the South African Civil Aviation Authority (SACAA).

Comair flies under the British Airways and Kulula brands. This is the latest calamity to befall the airline, which was placed in business rescue in 2020 as a result of government-imposed travel restrictions at the onset of Covid-related lockdowns.

In a statement released on Sunday, SACAA says while it recognises the efforts made by Comair “to close the findings as speedily as possible”, and that corrective action had been made in respect of some findings, other findings had not been attended to by early Sunday morning, prompting the suspension of its air operator certificate.

The suspension follows the visit by SACAA to Comair to investigate and determine the cause of a spate of occurrences affecting “a concerning number of flights operated by and BA Comair”.

“The SACAA sought to confirm Comair’s compliance with applicable Civil Aviation Regulations (CARs). The inspection was also aimed at reviewing Comair’s quality control management system (QC) and safety management systems (SMS) to establish compliance related to reporting, analysis and follow-up on occurrences, and corrective action plans to prevent recurrence,” says the civil aviation authority.

The regulator raised three Level 1 findings, and one Level 2 finding.

A Level 1 finding is an outcome that poses an immediate risk to safety and security, and must be closed with immediate effect, and a level 2 finding must be closed within seven days. The SACAA statement says it had accepted the corrective action and evidence submitted in respect of one Level 1 finding.

The regulator says it doesn’t issue such orders lightly, and is committed to returning Comair planes to full service as soon as possible. However, the commitment to safety in this case “supersedes any other need and this is to ensure that South Africa maintains its safety record of having zero fatal airline accidents in over thirty years on South African soil”.

It adds: “The lives of our aviation personnel and the users of civil aviation services is paramount, and it is a responsibility the regulator does not take lightly.”

There were reports in February of a British Airways flight from East London to Johannesburg returning to East London after the landing gear failed to retract. DispatchLIVE reported that Eastern Cape premier Oscar Mabuyane was on the flight. No injuries were reported.

Kulula says grounding is not justified

Kulula notified customers of the weekend grounding, adding that it did not believe the suspension of services was justified. The SACAA says the airline can appeal the decision.

“Despite working through the night [on Saturday], Comair will not be able to resume operations today [Sunday]. The SACAA still needs to review documentation provided overnight. We continue to engage constructively with the SACAA,” said Comair.

The airline said it is re-accommodating some passengers who have been affected by the suspension and will publish a list of all cancelled flights shortly.

The regulator says continuous improvement is a principle it will work hard at elevating as it ensures that aviation remains the safest mode of transport in this country.

“This discipline in ensuring high levels of compliance with civil aviation safety and security is demonstrated by the continuous prestigious performance of South Africa in international safety and security assessments,” says the SACAA statement.

“South Africa is periodically subjected to independent international audits by bodies such as the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) to measure South Africa’s compliance to the Standards and Recommended Practices (SARPs) of this United Nations body. In this regard, South Africa was last audited by ICAO in 2018 in terms of the Universal Safety Oversight Audit Programme – Continuous Monitoring Approach (USOAP CMA) and the country improved its compliance levels in that audit.”

In response to the suspension notice, the Department of Transport issued a statement saying SA has an impeccable aviation safety record “insofar as airline operations are concerned”.

“This is due to our robust aviation safety regime and the vigilance SACAA exercises in ensuring full compliance by airlines. We are committed to ensuring compliance with aviation safety prescripts without fear, favour or prejudice.”

Numsa ‘dismayed’ at grounding

Comair’s majority trade union, the National Union of Metalworkers of South Africa (Numsa) says it is dismayed at the grounding decision as a result of safety concerns which pose a potential hazard. This includes a Kulula Boeing 737-800 experiencing engine failure.

“We are deeply concerned about workers and the safety of the public at large given these very serious occurrences,” says Numsa spokesperson Phakamile Hlubi-Majola.

“We are not surprised at these unfortunate developments as we have been warning the airline from within, of the dangers of their cost cutting measures and that this would eventually have the impact of compromising safety standards, by not giving their aircraft enough ground time for proper maintenance.

“We demand that Comair focus on running the company and implementing a clear turnaround strategy. They must stop cutting salaries and benefits of the lowest paid workers in the company as this has clearly proven not be a solution. The CEO Glenn Orsmond does not have a vision to turn the organisation around and this is contributing to the crisis.”

The trade union says two years after going into business rescue, the airline company is still under business rescue and refuses to commit to a date as to when the business rescue process will end and the company be handed back to its own management and board. This is a clear lack of confidence in the leadership, it says.

“Comair has engaged in the three section 189 processes [a Labour Relations Act requirement to initiate staff retrenchments], reducing staff headcount and unilaterally removing benefits of our members for the apparent health of the company but all these have achieved is an overworked staff, and the grounding of the airline due to compromised safety standards,” says Numsa.

“Our members wish to pass a vote of no confidence in the CEO and his executive to protect their jobs and livelihoods which are threatened by management decisions that put profits over people and people’s livelihoods. We demand the resignation of Glen Orsmond and his executive and the withdrawal of the current threatening section 189 notice that was issued on the 1st of March 2022 to our members.”

This article originally referred to a reported incident in Cape Town International Airport where the door of a Boeing 777-300ER was ripped off during a routine towing incident. A reader and aviation specialist points out the plane in question is neither owned nor operated by Comair.

Listen/read: Luvuyo Silandela of the Civil Aviation Authority unpacks Comair’s compliance woes (read transcript)



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Jip – Fly SAA by default ne !!

One hopes the same level of scrutiny applies to the SAA planes. The door incident I would say was poor airport management rather than failure of plane. That said my car warns me if I try to drive with a door open.

Eish, Comair maybe not without fault but CAA”S own aircraft flew into a mountain near George, killing everyone aboard and an SAA “cargo” flight to Brussels would have crashed on take off if it was not for the warning systems. We meant to trust ANC SACAA? Third world here we come.

One has to wonder… is competition under such threat that “ safety concerns” are raised with such accurate timing! Call me paranoid, but this all seems to be a little to well orchestrated.
As far as I know, the maintenance and logistics of all airlines are done by the same people in the same place…in that case, should we not be concerned about the safety of ALL our domestic carriers?

Well, do they not fly the 737 Max?

Could this be undue influence of SAA??

End of comments.




Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: