Coronavirus: Why aren’t death rates rising with case numbers?

Your chances of dying with Covid-19 depend primarily on age.
Image: Shutterstock

It is a conundrum. For much of the past two months, many people have been convinced that mortality associated with Covid-19 would rise as the number of people testing positive with the disease increased. But this has not happened so far. Why? A look at government data from England and Wales can provide some clues.

By late summer 2020, the UK government had finally managed to produce a consistent definition of precisely what constitutes a positive case of coronavirus. It is defined as a person with at least one lab-confirmed positive Covid-19 test result (individuals who tested positive more than once are only counted once, on the date of their first positive test).

The first graph below shows cases by the day on which they were initially reported – represented by the blue line. Cases peaked at 5 451 on April 5, reached a low of 101 on June 10 and very recently have appeared to be rapidly rising again. The most recent rise in cases, to more than 2 600 a day, is particularly unsettling. The red line shows deaths per day, which have been very low for many weeks now and also still falling in number.

A graph showing COVID-19 cases and deaths per day in England and Wales from Febuary 1 – March 1.
Danny Dorling, Author provided

It’s important to remember that the number of cases has not been rising because the number of people carrying the disease has been increasing, but instead because more tests are being carried out, and especially in areas where the rate at which people have the disease is found to be higher.

The main reasons why we know that the number of deaths has not been rising is that the actual number of cases in the population has not been rising when measured per million people tested. We know this because the Office for National Statistics (ONS) is running a properly constructed surveillance programme which estimated that by August 25 only one person in every 2 000 in England had the disease, and each week only one person in every 27 000 was catching the disease (this proportion having been essentially stable for several months). The proportion in Wales was even lower at one in 2 200.

The ONS is currently increasing the sample size of its surveillance programme to 400 000 people in England with 150 000 being tested each fortnight in October.

A question of demographics

It is likely that among the steadily rising number of people who have tested positive for the disease since June, an increasing proportion are young and a declining proportion are older, so that having the disease is dramatically less lethal for each person with it. In March and April (before the June minimum was reached) younger adults aged 18-34 had the highest prevalence in antibody testing so we should not be surprised that outside of the most rigorous lockdown, cases are higher among the young.

Your chances of dying with Covid-19 depend primarily on age. Those chances are greatly reduced if you are younger – as the table below shows.

A table showing the numbers of deaths with COVID-19 in England and Wales by age.
Danny Dorling, Author provided

According to this data, by the end of August, someone aged 20-24 had a one in 100,000 chance of having died with a mention of Covid-19 on their death certificate; that risk doubles to one in 50 000 for people aged 30-34 and is more than one in 1 000 for men by age 65 and for women by age 75.

Another way of describing what the table reveals is that a grandmother in her early 90s is 120 times more likely to have died of the disease than her daughter aged 52 who, herself, is 259 times more likely to die than her 14-year-old daughter. Currently, mortality rates for all ages are very near zero as deaths per day are so low.

Cases increasing in the young and decreasing among the elderly is how the number of deaths can continue to fall even if cases found by the ONS surveillance study remain the same or even rise slightly, as long as fewer older people have the disease as compared to more younger people over time.

There is growing concern of younger people passing the disease to older people, but if a young person has had the disease, and is then very unlikely to have it in future, their chance of passing it on to an older person in future is much diminished. This is another reason for not hitting the panic button when case numbers rise.

Reaching a true mortality rate

Eventually, mortality rates from Covid-19 will fall as the proportion of people who have had it rises. The final graph below tries to illustrate just how far away from that point we are, but how we have clearly been moving towards it over the course of the past two months.

The graph shows the ratio of deaths to every 1,000 cases recorded each day. This is a crude measure, as mortality lags behind positive cases, but it is still a useful guide.

A graph showing deaths per thousand cases from COVID-19 in England and Wales.
Danny Dorling, Author provided

We can see that the number of people dying of Covid-19 falls from 217 for every 1 000 testing positive across all of England and Wales on June 24 (when so few people were being tested), to four by the end of August and just two per 1 000 by September 4. The fall is so fast and so great that a log scale is required to encompass it in one graph.

The fall cannot continue at this rate for much longer, and where the ratio eventually settles will be below the theoretical upper limit for the actual final overall mortality rate from this disease; a rate which we do not yet know.The Conversation

Danny Dorling, Halford Mackinder Professor of Geography, University of Oxford.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Get full access to Moneyweb's financial insights and support quality journalism.

Only R63 per month or R630 per year. You can cancel at any time.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Because it’s all Y2K all over again. It was a made up issue and it cost this country its’ future through on the job trainee government employees!!CASES CASES CASES CASES That’s all the prestitutes in the media hyped The death rate in S A is .027% and for the Flu 4.2% figure it out sheeple.

The ‘sheeple’ will believe everything the MSM throws at them.

Every government in the world, of every political persuasion, except for Trump (depending on his mood) and possibly Sweden, seem to take this virus seriously.

Nonetheless, I’m off to lick some doorknobs now, because Zokey in the Moneyweb comments says it’s Y2K all over again, and flopsy says we are sheeple.

I believe the lockdown should never have been implemented. It was stupid. But the rules like washing your hands, the mask and keeping your distance was a fantastic idea. For the first time in many years I did not get the flu this winter. You have no idea how I suffer when contracting the flu.

What SA hasn’t considered is that life expectancy in SA is only 63 !! What history will show is that the increase in unemployment as a result of the ill conceived lockdown will result in far more deaths than the virus itself. In the US 37000 people die with every one percent increase in the unemployment rate .

Lockdown is over….let’s see if the economy bounces back as much as you think.

Because its all mostly a lie and is not as deadly – very simple logic

Because the “COVID-19” “pandemic” was made up nonsense. Fearmongering to institute draconian Soviet style lockdowns to push the mandating of a vaccine.

The livelihoods of millions of people have been destroyed by these criminal actions of governments all over.

Only the stupid-rates rose with the numbers

Will my risk of dying from Covid-19 reduce IF I “act like a child”?

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: