You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Court orders replacement of Tshwane’s smart meters

But is the city ready to take over from the controversial PEU?
The onerous smart metering agreement has been bleeding the city dry. Picture: Supplied

A settlement agreement between the City of Tshwane and its controversial smart metering supplier PEU Capital Partners was made an order of the High Court on Tuesday.

In terms of the order the city may now remove the meters supplied by PEU and install new meters for the almost 13 000 Tshwane customers, mostly large power users, who have been supplied with electricity through the PEU system.

It further means that the city can now put a stop to the haemorrhaging of money that started late in 2013 when the smart metering contract was first implemented.

Tshwane member of the mayoral committee for corporate services Cilliers Brink confirmed to Moneyweb on Tuesday that these payments amounted to almost R5 million per day. In total the city has paid R3.1 billion to PEU so far.

It was alleged in court papers that PEU operated at a 63% profit margin.

PEU, through its special purpose vehicle Total Utilities Management Services (Tums), was supposed to replace all electricity meters in the city – about 800 000 at that stage – with smart prepaid meters and run the back-office and vending system.

The previous ANC administration agreed to pay PEU 19.5c of every rand vended through the system, seemingly under the impression that the scheme would result in substantial savings that would fund the commission.

That didn’t happen, and the commission proved to be wholly unaffordable. The ANC administration then entered into an interim services and termination agreement that would put a stop to the further smart meter rollout. It also provided for the city to pay PEU R950 million to take over infrastructure, and reduced PEU’s commission to 9.5c per rand vended.

The Democratic Alliance (DA) was in the opposition benches at the time and strongly criticised the ANC for entering into the original contract as well as the subsequent termination agreement, which the DA said was concluded on unacceptable terms.

AfriSake, the business arm of the Solidarity movement that has since been renamed Sakeliga, challenged the original deal as well as the termination agreement in court. Initially both the city and PEU opposed the challenge, but the city changed sides after the DA assumed office following the municipal elections in 2016.

A year ago, the court found the deal to be unconstitutional and set it as well as the termination agreement aside. The order was however suspended until a just and equitable remedy could be formulated that would ensure continued electricity supply to the city while the web is untangled.

It took a whole year for the matter to be brought before the court again. During that time the status quo was maintained, meaning that the city was bound to the onerous agreement that has been bleeding it dry financially.

The parties returned to court on Tuesday with a settlement proposal for the just and equitable remedy and it was made an order of the court.

In terms of the order the city must give PEU’s Tums written notice of the date when it is ready start the transfer of the system. The parties have been ordered to work together to replace the meters and associated system within four months after that date.

PEU has been ordered to provide certain information regarding the system to the city within set timeframes – and must continue rendering services “until the last PEU/Tums smart meter has been replaced and switch over has taken place”, according to the order.

Brink told Moneyweb that the city wants to take over the metering as soon as possible and believes it can render the services through newly appointed service providers at the normal industry rate of 6 to 7c per rand vended.

City administration has confirmed to Moneyweb that both parties agreed not to pursue civil claims against each other in connection with the matter.

This ‘clean break’ seems to be the lesser of two evils for the city; it agreed to the settlement rather than face the risk of protracted appeals that would result in the continued obligation to use PEU’s services at the inflated rate.

Asked if the city has appointed new service providers and whether it is ready to take over the services currently provided by PEU, Brink told Moneyweb that DA leadership received assurance from the administration that it is. However, he cautioned that they “are acutely aware that Tshwane’s supply chain management system is broken”.

“It is the most persistent legacy of the ANC in Tshwane. There are still far too many defects, by intent or neglect, in the specification, evaluation, and adjudication of tenders. In other instances, award letters take far too long to be awarded. This inhibits our ability to deliver services and roll out capital projects. In the last report of the city’s audit and performance committee they recommended a complete overhaul of Tshwane’s procurement system.

“Because the mayoral committee, just like all other councillors, is forbidden from even being observers on tender committees in terms of the MFMA [Municipal Finance Management Act], the city’s broken procurement system cannot be overhauled by our direct intervention. Our oversight role is performed after the fact.

“But we are determined to close the gaps in procurement policy and practice that allow for irregularities. MayCo [mayoral committee] has asked for a review of the business processes by which tenders are prepared and processed, as well as an assessment of the qualifications and employment of officials working in the supply chain management division. Once we discover possible irregularity, as was the case with [engineering firm] Glad Africa, we also bring it to light.”

Sakeliga spokesperson Armand Greyling says the organisation is satisfied with the settlement agreement. It concludes five years of litigation which has saved ratepayers at least R1 billion. He says the setting aside of the agreements should be a warning to other organs of state against entering into irregular procurement processes.




Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


This is the problem that the DA faces in all the metros it took over from the ANC, there is a lot of legacy corruption issues still dragging on municipal fiscus in these metros.

The larger issue with these independent prepaid meter contractors is not what they charge the municipalities but how they have managed to over charge the client. We had the problem when the private metering company started rolling out their meters to us in Tshwane and noticed our electricity bill jump by 20%. When we disputed the claim we were told that our consumption increased but accidently the original Tshwane bill was delivered to us since the original old meter was still in place together with the new meter and one could clearly see the 20% billing difference between the old metering and the new metering.

If you want to be sure they are billing you correctly install a separate home energy meter, they are cheap nowadays, and on the plus side you will start to get a good picture of your home energy consumption.

Though the PEU story in Tshwane is mainly about large users, not so much domestic meters.

DA controlled Johannesburg has also started rolling out smart meters anew. To my sorrow I allowed a smart meter to be installed. The ‘smart meter’ now indicates an increase in consumption of 300% Now I discover the DA in 2015 was dead against the awarding of the smart meter contract to a friend of Zuma’s and DA mayor Mashaba in 2017 threatened criminal charges after forensic investigation. I approached the DA via e-mail, but my questions have been ignored. I await my first utility bill with trepidation.

That is simply illegal as any re-seller of electricity is not allowed to re-sell electricity at a rate that is more than what the user would have paid if he got the electricity directly from the municipality. Check the municipality bylaws and also report the matter to Nersa for investigation. They do take complaints seriously and follow up on them

The minimum IQ standard for the US Military is 80. They classify people with an IQ below 80 as untrainable and unemployable. These people now all get jobs as ANC politicians and counselors at municipalities. Competence recognizes both competence and incompetence, but incompetence recognizes neither. This is why the most incompetent always has the loudest voice.

Someone has been watching Jordan Peterson… Its great stuff though

Ms Slabbert, please remind me who the principals of PEU are, your May 2015 article isn’t freely available I see.
Peter Malungani – Executive Chairman (a director of Investec SA and chairs SuperGroup;also served on the board at Transnet)
Busi Tshili – Deputy Chairman
Thuli Zuma
D Quint

Peu Group (Proprietary) Limited (Peu) is a black owned and managed investment holding and advisory company. [Stated twice on the webpage incase any ANC cadre missed it the first time]

From Mail & Guardian [4 Feb 2011]
The connections that disconnected Jo’burg
… Johannesburg’s chaotic billing system … a R208-million tender … awarded to an inexperienced company whose directors have a record of high-level involvement with local and national government and links with powerful ANC politicians.

Peter Malungani, a Masana director and founder and executive chair of the Peu Group, previously served as chair of the Gauteng tender board finance committee. In 2009 the Sunday Times reported that then-president Kgalema Motlanthe and his partner, Gugu Mtshali, had moved into a R7-million Houghton home owned by Malungani.

Thanks. Is that Zuma’s daughter there ?

The ratepayers of Tshwane all owe Solidarity and Sakeliga a debt of gratitude for intervening in this matter on their behalf. Well done!

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: