Crucial Nersa tariff decisions up for discussion

Cumulative effect could be significant.
The matters addressed in the three discussion documents are likely to have a significant effect on electricity tariffs. Image: Shutterstock

Consumers can have their say about several matters that will determine how much they pay for electricity from next year, after energy regulator Nersa published three discussion documents for comment.

This comes amid extreme uncertainty about the future price path of electricity after different courts found five earlier Nersa determinations of Eskom tariffs to be unlawful and set them aside.

Nersa earlier determined that Eskom’s electricity tariff would increase by an average of 5.22% next year, but the court orders will most probably result in significant additional revenue for Eskom that must be recovered from consumers.


The first matter

The first discussion document pertains to Nersa’s determination of Eskom’s Regulatory Clearing Account (RCA) balances for 2014/15, 2015/16 and 2016/17.

The RCA is a risk mitigation mechanism that allows Nersa to retrospectively correct over- or under-recovery of Eskom’s revenue through tariff adjustments if assumptions underlying the original tariff determination play out differently in reality.

The High Court in Pretoria set aside Nersa’s decision to grant Eskom R32.67 billion in total for the three years, which is not even half of the R66.7 billion Eskom applied for.

The decisions were remitted to Nersa for reconsideration.

In its discussion document about this, Nersa sets out the court ruling, Eskom’s argument and Nersa’s own analysis. It then asks comment from consumers about how it should deal with specific contentious issues.

The deadline for written comment is the end of this month and Nersa will also conduct virtual public meetings from November 23 to December 2.

It plans to announce its decision on February 26 next year.

It is not yet clear when any additional amount granted to Eskom will be added to electricity tariffs. However, since the court also found that Nersa had acted unconstitutionally by delaying its original decisions and that Eskom has already incurred the actual expenses (in the 2014 to 2017 period), it would hardly be able to spread it over an extended period.

The second matter

The second matter up for discussion is the liquidation of the R13 billion Nersa has granted Eskom in its RCA determination for 2018/19.

Nersa gives consumers three options, namely

  • Adding it all to the tariffs next year, in which case tariffs will increase by 11.23% (if added to the 5.22% increase determined earlier);
  • Spreading it over two years with an 8.12% increase next year. The basic tariff increase for the following year has not yet been determined, but the impact of spreading the RCA over two years will be a deduction from it of 0.81%.
  • Spreading it over three years with an increase of 7.08% next year and a deduction from the base tariff of 0.83% in 2022/23 and 3.43% the next year.

The deadline for written comments about this matter is the end of this month and Nersa will also conduct a national virtual public hearing on November 2.

It plans to finalise the decision on November 26.

The third matter

The third matter Nersa is bringing to consumers is a supplementary tariff application from Eskom for amounts Nersa should have granted it for 2018/19 if it had made its decision lawfully.

The court earlier also set that tariff aside, but since Nersa had at that stage already started processing Eskom’s RCA application for that year, it gave Eskom the option of waiting for the result and submitting a supplementary application if it still thought it had been short-changed.

This is exactly what Eskom did, applying now for an additional R5 billion.

In this application Eskom for the first time applies for compensation for the time-value of money. Neither the prescribed methodology nor the court order provides for such compensation and Nersa specifically asks for public comment on it.

The deadline for written comments is October 30 and Nersa plans to announce its decision on February 26.

The cumulative effect of these matters on electricity tariffs has the potential to be significant but is not specifically being addressed in the discussion documents.

And that’s not all …

In addition, Nersa is still waiting to hear whether it will be granted leave to appeal the high court decision that set aside its tariff determination for 2019/20 to 2021/22.

In terms of this order Nersa must add R23 billion it unlawfully deducted from Eskom’s revenue for each of the three years to electricity tariffs for the next three years.

That alone would see the tariff increase bumped from 5.22% to about 15%.

Nersa’s timetable for dealing with the three matters is aimed at finalising them in time for Eskom to table the increased tariffs for bulk sales to municipalities in parliament on March 15.

Eskom’s tariff increases are annually implemented on April 1 for its direct customers, while the tariffs paid by customers in municipal supply areas increase annually on July 1.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


The battered and bashed faithful 4% will once again be sponsoring electricity.

Well our judiciary has gone one way!!!!

Cant even get a judgement out on a 6 year old Malema simple little case. Is the expectation now that citizens must just entertain what comes from them and be happy?

The whole lot here are corrupt and should they run ESKOM like a business and not a charity they would be able to give consumers discounts for decades to come.

Our beloved chief justice might not be aware for the “shortcomings” as he is most probably doing the memorial lecture circuit or something more important.

Government and SOEs at war with the citizenry.

What really galls me is that Nersa are supposed to be an independent body who does the tariff determination, yet they side with Eskom in incrementing the electricity costs to municipalities who then add on their own charges. The other galling asperct is that Nersa never intervenes in build over runs on Eskoms building of Medupi and Kusile and by the time these two units become fully operational the majority of their consumers would have switched to alternate energy sources

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: