You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Distressed companies can apply for lower electricity tariffs

Frameworks for incentive pricing have been finalised.
The agreements are available for companies that have been forced to close plants or where closure is imminent. Image: Dean Hutton, Bloomberg

The door is once again open for distressed industries to negotiate lower electricity tariffs with their respective suppliers, be it Eskom or their local municipalities.

This follows the Department of Energy’s finalisation of the framework for short-term negotiated pricing agreements to save jobs and maintain Eskom’s sales volumes.

The department has also issued an interim framework for long-term negotiated pricing agreements to assist existing industries. According to this document the final framework will further provide for incentives to encourage new investments in South Africa’s industrial sector.

Moneyweb reported in March that energy regulator Nersa had approved two-year incentive pricing agreements for Silicon Smelters and Sublime Technologies.

This enabled Silicon Smelters to reopen its furnaces in Polokwane and eMalahleni, but it eventually closed a few months before the agreement came to an end.

The Sublime agreement ended in September.

Although Nersa received similar applications from other companies, it stopped processing them while awaiting policy guidance from the department.

With the finalisation of the framework, these applications can now be processed.

The framework limits the timeframe for the Nersa process to 120 days.

According to the new frameworks, the short-term agreements will apply for three years with an option to extend for another two. They are available for companies that have been forced to close plants or where closure is imminent.

Prerequisites

Nersa will analyse company information to ensure that electricity is a significant cost driver and among the top three cost items. The applicants’ electricity bills must be paid up and they will be disqualified if they have been in trouble with competition authorities.

Their applications must be supported by the Department of Trade, Industry and Competition and they will agree to the Eskom system operator interrupting their power supply at short notice under certain conditions.

On the upside of commodity prices, Eskom will share in the benefit.

The interim long-term framework provides for agreements of up to 10 years.

Eskom’s decades-old negotiated pricing agreement with South32 for its aluminium smelter in Richards Bay has been the target of much criticism. The tariff Eskom charged the company was linked to the aluminium price and at times it was heavily subsidised by consumers.

This agreement ended recently, but South32 chief operating officer Mike Fraser told Engineering News that it has reached a new agreement with Eskom on the same basis as its agreement with Mozal Aluminium and not linked to the commodity price.

It still requires Nersa approval.

Eskom has confirmed that it will now adjust the agreement in line with the new framework before submitting it to Nersa.

The interim framework for long-term agreements provides that companies will be disqualified if they or their main shareholder have been found guilty of corruption in the previous three years.

Even an investigation in this regard can result in disqualification and the company will have to refund any benefits it has enjoyed to date.

Process

Companies must submit their applications to their electricity suppliers, who will submit them to Nersa. Should a municipal supplier fail to do the submission, the client can approach Nersa directly.

Nellis Bester, chair of the Ferro Alloys Producers Association (Fapa), says there are still more questions than answers about the new regime. Fapa has met Mineral Resources and Energy Minister Gwede Mantashe about the matter and is waiting for feedback from his department.

According to Bester, Fapa expects the frameworks to deliver cost savings of a mere 5-10%, which is not enough for industry to survive.

He says 30% of Fapa members’ production capacity is currently standing idle due to high cost and low market demand.

Bester says South African industry currently pays $75 per megawatt-hour (MWh) as opposed to the $40 of international competitors. In Europe, where governments subsidise their local industries, it can be as low as $20.

Read: Refinancing of renewable IPPs won’t temper electricity tariffs

He calls for the scrapping of subsidies for residential customers included in Eskom’s industrial tariffs, which he says can be as much as 14% of current tariffs.

Bester adds that should Eskom get the tariff increases it is owed according to recent court judgments, it would be the end for local industry.

Moneyweb earlier reported that Nersa is appealing a judgment that set aside Nersa’s tariff determination for the current three-year period and ordered a tariff increase of 15% next year.

The order has been suspended pending the appeal. This is only one of several judgments favouring Eskom.

COMMENTS   9

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

The abundance of shallow, high-grade coal beds enabled the previous government to produce the cheapest electricity in the world. The competitiveness of the South African economy was built upon cheap energy, produced by an efficient Escom, that was rated as the best utility in the world.

Over the past 25 years the ANC, with its policies of cadre-deployment, BEE, state capture, tenderpreneurs and general lawlessness covered the high-grade coal beds under 5 km of manure overburden. Now, Eskom is bankrupt, electricity is unaffordable, the local industry is uncompetitive, unemployment is sky-high and the state is on the brink of a debt default.

The only thing that has changed is the ruling party. The mindset of the average voter covers the coal beds to change the shallowest coal in the world into the deepest, the best utility in the world into the worst, the cheapest electricity into the most expensive and the most competitive industries into the least competitive. These are the results of the mindset of the voter.

We need the free market, privatisation, to insert a circuit breaker between the mindset of the average voter and the state of the economy.

Sorry Sensei : but the old cheap electricity had nothing to do with clever old guard or coal and everything to do with a very boring accounting element : they priced depreciation on historical cost.

Simple math:
If a power station cost $200m in 1980 when Rand was .8 the idiots counted R160m over 40 years or R4m per year depreciation in their costing model that determined their prices.

So by 2020 when that same plant costs $300m but the Runt is 15 Eskom needs R4500m and it has only recovered R160m in selling prices.

They should like any sane national energy utility at all times have priced capacity replacement cost into selling prices.

My firm tried telling Eskom that back in 90’s when working out their mothball plans (yes Eskom had excess capacity for years) but it was not politically popular to hear that electricity prices should double.

But for sure, the last decade has been an unmitigated disaster by combination of outright theft and widespread gross incompetence in the name of transformation.

Let’s just please demist our rose tinted glasses when we hark back to the good old days. They were an accounting error

Under the previous government, Eskom subsidised the consumer. Now, the consumer subsidises Eskom.

Fully concur Sensei !!
This situation will only change with Radical Voting Transformation — Only registered and up to date taxpayers are allowed to cast a ballot !!!

Good idea : we will have about 4 Million voters out of 60 Million !!!and at least the EFF will have no voters !!!

It should be disturbing, but I actually find it funny that a distressed Eskom and distressed Municipalities are providing lower tariffs to distressed users.

Do not be distressed, the distressed tax payer will cover the cost.

Check out all the “little” riders to be used as an excuse to reject getting these lower tariff’s.

All these types of grants and applications always seem to not apply to your business but others seem to qualify easily.

Our well-transformed people are well ahead of this game: For zero electricity tariffs just erect an illegal connection (and vote ANC),

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: