Proudly sponsored by

Doubts surface about planned implementation of Aarto on July 1

President has yet to sign and gazette a notice about the implementation date.
The tribunal that will adjudicate all appeals by motorists does not seem to be in place yet. Image: Siphiwe Sibeko/Reuters

The government is facing a race against time to be in a position to start implementing the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (Aarto) Act in three days’ time.

The act might be used to enforce the payment of e-tolls, as outlined by Moneyweb earlier this month.

Read: Implementation of Aarto Act on July 1 facing possible court challenges

Advocate Stefanie Fick, head of the accountability division at the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa), said on Monday there is “no chance” the Aarto Amendment Act can be implemented from July 1 because the president has not yet gazetted a notice confirming the date of implementation.

“If it goes ahead, it will fail. I don’t think they will be that stupid to roll it out without it being gazetted,” she said.

The Presidency has not yet responded to a query from Moneyweb about when, and if, the president intends to sign and gazette a notice about the implementation date of Aarto.

Appeals Tribunal

However, Fick stressed that even if the president did sign a notice making the implementation of Aarto effective from July 1, it could not be implemented without the establishment of the Appeals Tribunal.

The tribunal, a national body of nine part-time members, will adjudicate all appeals by motorists about infringement notices.

Both Outa and the Automobile Association of South Africa (AA) have questioned how the tribunal will be able to handle the workload arising from the millions of traffic fines issued countrywide after Aarto is implemented.

Fick said Outa will definitely apply for an interdict to stop the implementation of Aarto if the implementation date of the Aarto Amendment Act is gazetted and the Department of Transport implements the entire act or only implements the act in certain jurisdictions without an Appeals Tribunal.

“You can’t run the process without the Appeals Tribunal. We don’t think they [Department of Transport] have an Appeals Tribunal,” she said.

Fick added that positions for the Appeals Tribunal were advertised but the Department of Transport has not yet published the names of the short-listed candidates.

She said Outa has been in contact with the department about the establishment process of the Appeals Tribunal but has not received a response.

Fick added that Outa participated in a seminar where the department was talking about amending the act because of the need to have an appeals tribunal in every province instead of a single national tribunal but the act has not yet been amended to permit this.

“Aarto will not roll out in July. Impossible,” she said.

Things were ‘on track’ back in May

Minister of Transport Fikile Mbalula said during his budget vote speech in May that his department was on track with its target to proclaim July 1 2021 as the effective date for the nationwide rollout of Aarto.

“We have previously made a commitment to the rollout of the Aarto Act of 1998, bolstered by the Aarto Amendment Act, which was signed into law by the president on 13 August 2019.

“Over the medium term, we have allocated R545 million to the Road Traffic Infringement Agency [RTIA] to fund the rollout. R215 million has been allocated for the current financial year,” he said.

Court action

The implementation of Aarto is also facing some legal challenges.

Outa filed an application in the Pretoria High Court in September 2020 in terms of which it has applied for the Aarto Act and Aarto Amendment Act to be declared unconstitutional.

The application was issued against the Minister of Transport, the Minister of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs, the Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA), which is responsible for implementing Aarto, and the RTIA’s Appeals Tribunal.

It is scheduled to be heard on October 18 and 19.

Outa said on Monday its attorneys wrote to the legal team for the two ministers and the RTIA on June 15, requesting them to refrain from implementing Aarto until the high court has ruled on this legal challenge.

Andri Jennings, Outa’s attorney in this matter, said in a letter to the State Attorney in Pretoria that it is premature for the national rollout to commence prior to the constitutional implications of Aarto being resolved.

“We note that no effective date has been officially gazetted. We further submit that the respondents are not ready to proceed with the national rollout of Aarto and should they persist, it may lead to the system’s collapse.

“We therefore advise caution so that the respondents do not incur wasteful expenditure of public money,” she said.

Outa said it has not yet received any response from the State Attorney.

City of Cape Town

The City of Cape Town is also considering a legal challenge to the implementation of Aarto.

Read: City of Cape Town to fight Aarto (Oct 2019)

Alderman JP Smith, Mayoral Committee Member for Safety and Security at the City of Cape Town, told Moneyweb last month the City is “considering its options to challenge the implementation of Aarto specifically with regard to its functionality because we believe it to be ineffective in reducing road fatalities”.

Smith said the other objection would be related to the powers of law enforcement officers “where Aarto legislation appears to conflict with the local government mandate as far as it relates to traffic and parking”.

The AA is also opposed to the implementation of Aarto.

AA spokesperson Layton Beard said earlier this month the association does not believe the system is ready to be implemented.

Read: Could Aarto stop you from driving for 122 years?

Beard said the AA remains concerned about the Appeals Tribunal because no case has been advanced which would assure that it would be impartial and uphold a consistent standard of adjudication.

He said a number of other provisions in the Aarto Act are of concern, including that motorists will have to pay a R100 levy in addition to the fine to get an infringement notice, which “is unconscionable”.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   11

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Please stay calm people. Everything is fine. Everything is on track. The rollout is also on track. Nobody knows where the track is or what happened to the track but it is on track.
Perhaps another medium term R545 million will help things along?

What happened to the scrapping of etolls?

“Nobody knows where the track is or what happened to the track but it is on track…”

One liners, with instant coffee, in South Africa ….therapy

Just another e toll saga coming.
The form R Two Hundred will be widely utilised to bypass this system if it does come into operation.

I wrote many years ago (published) “When the government wants you money THEY WILL GET IT! Buy the stupid tag! I bought it. But I come from America where this dithering does not happen. They just come after you, if you don’t acquiesce!

It is this kind of view, that saw, “law abiding” citizens, reporting people like Ann Frank to the authorities. I often wonder, at what point do people who think it easier or nobler to simply follow the law, start to question themselves ? When they are required to simply wear a badge or further down the line when they’r ordered to undress and go have a shower ? As Judge Louis Brandeis once said: “The greatest dangers to liberty lurk in the insidious encroachment by people of zeal, well meaning but without understanding”

Between Aarto and the outstanding income taxes, some road users are going to find it tough to stay on the roads.

How will this lot manage this???

With deployed cadre’s??

It will be like everything else they touch. Wont work.

This is probably an attempt to fix something they have broken already.

#Voetsekanc.

Is the new 0% alcohol rule taking effect regardless of Aarto?

Somebody still needs to find me ANY science behind the decision that what we had (5% I think) was more dangerous than 4, 3, 2 and 1%

I really do not condone driving under the influence of anything, but 0% is silly. So when restaurants re-open and I sit down for a good burger with one craft beer : illegal.

How long does it take one beer to metabolise to below 0.01% in a test? Am I illegal behind steering wheel later tonight, tomorrow morning in commute?

The appeals tribunal definitely needs to be in place. Because demerit points may mean that you loose your licence it will be wise to challenge every ticket where there is even a slight reason to do so whereas before it was just simpler to pay the ticket to avoid being harassed.

Moneyweb, please stop misleading your readers that the national rollout of AARTO will have any effect on SANRAL’s ability to enforce e-tolls, because they won’t. All the legislation to make that possible has existed for longer than two decades.

From a specifically AARTO point of view, the charge codes for failure to pay toll have been in Schedule 3 to the AARTO Act since it was first gazetted in 2008. SANRAL is an issuing authority and has had the right to use them in the AARTO pilot project area. It has not done so. It has also not used S27 of the SANRAL Act to pursue non-compliance outside the AARTO pilot area.

We can speculate about why that might be. My own opinion is that it would expose them to a challenge over the legality of e-tolls which they would quite possibly lose. Or perhaps I should state that in the past tense, since the system has collapsed and they’ve now handed the hot potato to Cabinet.

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: