Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

E-toll summons: Sanral has a strong case – law expert

More than 1 000 summonses due to be delivered.

If Sanral can prove that a road user travelled on its Gauteng freeways at a specific time and date, it would have a strong case in court to collect outstanding e-tolls related to such a trip, says law expert Professor Marinus Wiechers.

Sanral said in a statement on March 21 that road users who have persistently refused to settle their e-toll debt may receive civil summonses over the next few days.

This prompted a statement by the Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) questioning Sanral’s method. “Sanral’s decision to tackle the high value, corporate defaulters, on the basis of a civil charge, is questionable, in that this angle is generally one taken on disputes of a contractual nature,” Outa said.


Outa came to the conclusion that road users who have not signed a contract with Sanral won’t be at risk. It further argued that even those who had signed such agreements, might have done so “under duress” based on threats of criminal prosecution against defaulters. Consensus, which is the legal basis for a binding contract, might be lacking as a result, Outa argued.

Chairperson Wayne Duvenhage said: “Outa believe there can be no consensus for e-toll defaulters, as there is no agreement between the parties and furthermore, if the road user considers the premise for Sanral’s one-sided agreement to be invalid due to the unlawful declaration of the roads as tolled roads, we fail to understand how Sanral can bring a civil claim against the road users.”

Wiechers does not agree with this argument. He equates the Sanral liability with that of property owners to pay property rates. Property owners do not sign any contract with their local authorities to pay property rates, but if they fail to do so, the municipality can claim payment of the outstanding amount through civil litigation.

He says road users incurred liability when they used the relevant roads and if Sanral can prove that a specific road user travelled on a specific stretch of tolled road at a specific date and time, it would have a strong case to demand payment.


Sanral project manager for the Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP) Alex van Niekerk told Moneyweb that more than 1 000 summonses are due to be delivered in the next few weeks. And that’s just the beginning.

Road users who have already been contacted about outstanding debt, for example by SMS and email, and have failed to pay, will be the first to be summoned, Van Niekerk said. Other defaulters will receive summonses later, if they ignore reminders and requests to make payment.

The sheriff will be knocking on the doors of businesses as well as private individuals owing both small and large amounts, he said. Smaller amounts will be dealt with in the Magistrate’s Court in the area where the road user lives and bigger amounts will be dealt with in the North Gauteng High Court in Pretoria.

Van Niekerk said every person has a right to oppose the claims and, while some may differ, Sanral is convinced on the basis of legal advice, that it can claim payment successfully.

He said there is no indication of when the first case may be heard in court.

Road users who receive summonses will, like all other e-toll defaulters, have the option to pay their historic debt and qualify for 60% discount until May 2. Thereafter, Sanral might find it diffucult to accept a debt settlement unless it is authorised by regulation, Van Niekerk said. “Sanral is not like retail creditors that have a discretion to grant discounts,” he said.

Van Niekerk warned that road users who ignore summonses could get default judgements against them, which would affect their credit records.

E-toll revenue

Sanral is currently collecting R80 million to R90 million in e-toll revenue per month, up from R60 million around August/September last year. Van Niekerk said while this is lower than earlier projections, Sanral is encouraged by the upward trend.

He said less than 20% of defaulting road users contacted for collection flatly refuse to pay and an increasing number are making use of the 60% discount offer. Sanral however suspects that many planning to take up the offer are hanging on to their money until shortly before the May 2 deadline.

The issuing of summonses is the natural next step after government introduced its new dispensation for e-tolls with lower tariffs and 60% discount on historic debt last year, Van Niekerk said.

At the same time Sanral, like all other government agencies, has to show investors and ratings agencies that it will do what is necessary to realise the potential e-toll income stream, he said.

Sanral further has a responsibility towards the hundreds of thousands of road users who regularly pay their e-tolls, to collect outstanding debt. “Failing to do so would provide a good reason for regular payers to stop paying their e-tolls,” he said.

Cosatu rejects ‘bureaucratic bullying and arrogance’

Trade union federation Cosatu in a statement rejected Sanral’s plans to issue summonses as an “extreme form of bureaucratic bullying and arrogance”. It called on government “to reign in their marauding state entity, Sanral”.

Cosatu said the overwhelming majority of Gauteng residents have rejected e-tolls; that bullying them into it won’t work; and that it will only result in more wasting of resources.

The trade union called for the development of an efficient integrated public transport model that will provide safe, reliable and affordable transport.

“The apartheid spatial planning has left us with a legacy of the black majority that stays far away from their workplaces. These workers spend more than a quarter of their salaries on transport costs,” Cosatu said, adding that for Sanral to force these workers to pay for “illegally privatised roads” is both criminal and incomprehensible.

Cosatu said the only solution to the e-toll problem “is for government to listen to the people and totally scrap them.”

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.



To comment, you must be registered and logged in.


Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

In the first instance, the freeways belong to the tax payers and NOT Sanral. They are just a body that looks after the roads, builds new ones paid for by us taxpayers and takes instruction from taxpayers via government.

Secondly, making criminals of the very people who funded the roads will be a sure recipe for Sanral’s instructors, namely the ruling party in government, to find themselves loosing votes at election time.

The next majority party, be it the DA or the EFF will reverse the disgraceful legislation that Sanral and the ANC hold holier than the New Testament.

“If Sanral can prove that a road user travelled on its Gauteng freeways at a specific time and date, it would have a strong case in court”

No, BS. In terms of the regulations Sanral also has to deliver the invoice within a certain time, 30 days I think it was originally.
I for one have never received these invoices within 30 days and I suspect most of the invoices are never even sent out by Sanral. Add to this the known, provable chaos at the Post Office, including that lengthy strike, and the balance of probabilities moves in the road user’s favour. And we are specifically dealing with a balance of probabilities here.

Fackem, I say.

Amazing, eveyone’s a lawyer!

Lets get one thing straight, I’m no fan of e-tolls, and if I didn’t have a company issued tag, I’d be one of those refusing to pay…. until I absolutely have to.

But … pay we will! Our government is democratically elected, which means that the majority of voters have given the government a mandate to run and manage and govern the country, essentially as they see fit (subject to the constitution, of course) for a period of 5 years.

The government (like it or not) DOES have the right to implement tolling and collect toll fees. The ONLY recourse to this is to have the scheme declared unconstitutional (very, very unlikely – we’re just as unlikely to have rates and taxes declared unconstitutional) or, vote the government out, and another one in that will do away with e-tolls (not gonna happen).

So slowly but surely SANRAL will get its act together (equipment certified, bills and notices sent out as per the law), and once this is done, your e-toll debt will become as collectible as any other debt, with the same consequences for failing to pay. There will be no flooded justice system. It just takes one judgement in favor of SANRAL to set a precedent (which is bound to happen, short of the not-going-to-happen declaration of being unconstitutional), and then SANRAL will sort their Excel spreadsheet of money owning from largest to smallest and slowly start working its way down.

Like I said, I’m no supporter of e-tolls (thats putting it mildly) but all these grandiose statements about what SANRAL can/cant do will ultimately count for little. Get voting, or get ready to cough up.

Load All 4 Comments
End of comments.


Insider GOLD
ONLY R63pm

Moneyweb's premium subscription is a membership service which will give you access to a number of tools to take charge of your investments.
Choose a yearly subscription at R630pa - SAVE R126

Get instant access to all our tools and content. Monthly subscription can be cancelled at any time.



Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: