You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Evolution of ANC economic policy sheds light on squabble over Reserve Bank

Historically, the bank’s mandate was based on the interests of ‘balanced and sustained growth’.
In 1994, the ANC was convinced that an independent central bank would buttress the credibility of its economic policy management. Picture: Moneyweb

The recent squabble over the mandate of the South African Reserve Bank (Sarb) has very little to do with real economic policies. It is rather emblematic of the intensely polarised levels of political distrust that currently exists within the African National Congress (ANC), the governing party. Compounding the problem is the lack of any coherent grand vision from the post-apartheid leadership of the ANC about the road they wish South Africa to embark on.

The ANC has been largely clear on values and principles (non-racial, democratic, state-led, redistributive) that inform economic policy but short on specific details of what strategies could achieve these. This may have served the ANC well during its years in exile. However, since the transition to democracy in 1994, the costs of its inability to deliberatively focus on important issues in the economic realm have come back to haunt the party.

Now, as it muddles from one crisis to the next, the various factions of the party will use particular issues on the economy, and everything else from the land issue to the role of the ANC Women’s League, to fight their battles. What should concern all South Africans is the enormous costs this lack of coherence has on the economy – from former president Jacob Zuma’s firing of finance ministers Nhlanhla Nene and Pravin Gordhan, to the recent squabble and the Public Protector’s outrageous over-reach in her bizarre Absa “findings”.

Evolution of economic policy

We have found no evidence of the official ANC policy stance on the Reserve Bank and monetary policy going into the negotiations that delivered the 1994 political settlement. It is mentioned only once. And that is in an administrative sense in the Ready to Govern document the ANC published in 1992.

During the negotiations, the ANC’s stance on an independent central bank seems to have been informed by a visit, among others, to the German Bundesbank by some members of its Department of Economic Policy. This visit convinced the ANC that support for an independent central bank would buttress the credibility of its economic policy management. For the National Party, the objective was to keep what they perceived to be a populist and ‘socialist-inclined’ ANC away from the levers of monetary policy-making.

As it turned out, the sections of the constitution that dealt with the central bank were not debated much during the negotiations because the major parties were in agreement.

How Sarb’s mandate came about

We do not yet have the official transcripts of what was discussed behind the closed doors of Codesa. Such transcripts should shed light on how the decision on the independence of the Sarb was contoured around the economic policy positions of the major parties.

Also noteworthy is the fact that the constitutional clause on the mandate of the Sarb bears an uncanny resemblance to the bank’s 1990 mission statement. This is no coincidence. Chris Stals, who was Sarb governor at the time, has said that the constitutional clause was drawn directly from the Sarb’s mission statement.

The Sarb’s 1990 mission statement stated that the bank’s “primary aim was the protection of the internal and external value of the rand”. These words are virtually the same as those that entered the final Constitution in 1996. We understand that the ANC added in words to the effect that the bank had to carry out its mandate in the interests of “balanced and sustained growth … ”.

Neither balanced nor sustainable

The notion of ‘balanced growth’ is a curious and largely meaningless turn of phrase that has little or no traction in monetary or economic theory. The only reference we are aware of relates to its use in the early 1950s. That was in the famous debate between economists Albert Hirschman and Paul Rosenstein-Rodan about the best route to development for the newly independent countries in Africa and Asia.

To argue that this vague phrase means that the Sarb also has growth mandate is disingenuous. The Sarb has succeeded in its narrow (and narrowing) price stability mandate. But its policy stance has not helped to create sustainable or ‘balanced’ growth, however one interprets the latter. The growth of an economy with such high levels of income and wealth inequality, arguably the highest in the world, as well as unemployment of 40% (by the broader definition) is neither sustainable nor balanced.

We accept that economic reform is not a matter for monetary policy alone. But limiting the role of monetary policy to ensuring price and financial stability doesn’t help either. Added to this is the ruling out of activist fiscal policy because of the preoccupation with budget deficits. This therefore means that the burden of economic policy reform will have to fall on microeconomic restructuring alone. If that is the position of government, perhaps President Cyril Ramaphosa should just say so.

Historical anomaly

The ‘ownership’ of the Sarb is not a matter to get ourselves into knots about. That it has private shareholders is an anomaly of history. While most central banks established in the early 20th century had private shareholders, most have since changed this to state ownership.

This really is a matter that the ANC should have sorted during the negotiations phase of the transition to democracy but, as we have argued above, there was neither an appetite in the top echelons of the ANC to address this anomaly or related policy matters nor did they apply their minds to that matter in the hurly burly of the Codesa negotiations.

There was an opportunity again to address this in the early 2000s when the Sarb came under fire from a group of right wing shareholders hell bent on gate-crashing the board and cashing in on the nationalisation of the bank they hoped would follow. It has now become a political football, symbolic of the political fractiousness we are now experiencing.

We would have no problem with, and in fact would strongly support, taking the central bank into state ownership while retaining its operational independence. This will bring it into line with the global norm. But this has to be done at the right time, under the right conditions.

Whatever the debate of the early 1990s may have been, the Sarb was granted operational independence. Tampering with its independence now will be risky in the extreme, not least in terms of the country’s credit rating. One point worth emphasising is that most independent central banks are also state-owned. But we fear that those in a particular faction of the ANC pushing for the nationalisation of the central bank may have a far more insidious agenda.

A matter for informed debate

The issue of the mandate of the Sarb is of course a matter that has been the subject of serious debate. Given the challenges of growth and employment in the economy, it is difficult to sustain the argument that these are entirely irrelevant to the Sarb. On the contrary, any reasonable state would align its policy mechanisms and institutions to its overall economic agenda.

But the debate needs to be held in a more considered manner, informed by evidence. This should include inputs from specialists who understand how financial systems operate and how the economic growth process works.

We would argue that the debate about the mandate of the Sarb needs to be located within a clearly articulated political vision and social compact on the transformative good society South Africans aspire to. Such a vision and social impact have yet to emerge. When they do, they must be accompanied by the mechanisms of economic and social policy that will be required to give effect to such a vision.

Vishnu Padayachee and Robert van Niekerk are authors of Shadow of Liberation: Contestation and Compromise in the Economic and Social Policy of the African National Congress, 1943-1996 (Wits University Press, October 2019)The Conversation.

The authors are all from the University of the Witwatersrand – Imraan Valodia is dean of commerce, law and management; Robert van Niekerk is public governance chair at the Wits School of Governance; and Padayachee is distinguished professor and ‘Derek Schrier and Cecily Cameron’ Chair in Development Economics in the School of Economics and Business Sciences.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons licence. Read the original article here.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Concerns about ownership and mandate of the SARB is much simpler and needs no technical or academic debate for the man in the street.

When the ANC does anything it enriches a few to the detriment of the whole population, economy and state. They destroy everything they touch.

Does anyone actually believe that when they voted on this in some “structure” following some “process” that the participants actually knew and understood what they were voting for? Do they understand now?

The only reason THEY want to change the mandate is to get THEIR hands on the money boxed up in the SARB. Among other there is about $47 billion in offshore reserves held by SARB. THEY would gladly want to nationalize that and pump it into THEIR so called “sovereign fund”.

What is stopping the ANC from appointing Ace Magashule as the next governor of the Reserve bank?
The government is the majority shareholder, the ANC controls the government, ergo the ANC can appoint Ace as the next governor.
The consequence will be a total disaster, but the ANC does not seem to mind national disasters. viz cadres at Eskom, SAA, SABC etc.

You are right. The scary reality is that through the mechanism I explained earlier, by means of the mandate of the Reserve Bank, Ace Magashule is already the de-facto governor of the Reserve Bank. This is a serious situation that will result in the premature deaths of 25 million people, mostly ANC supporters.

The problem is that the bulk of SAfricans have no idea what they are talking about and listen to the likes of Ace/Julius then take their word as law. There is no amount of logic or fact that will convince anyone in SA, those guys are out there saying the reserve bank is why people don’t have jobs, meanwhile they want to remove the road block to accessing further funds for themselves.

It is really as simple as that. SA’s problem is poverty, solving that would solve the bulk of our major issues, that was however never on the ANCs agenda.

ANC economic policy = corruption and theft.

“The ANC has been largely clear on values and principles (non-racial…”

Ummm . . . which ANC?

The ANC has proven time and time again that they are not capable of improving the lives of ordinary Blacks and as a result they are forced to loot and steal – so at least their leaders can show material gains – and create distractions in the form of the SARB mandate which is nothing more than a political gimmick. If the ANC was truly interested in the masses, critical functions like public education, safety and security and public healthcare would not have been decimated to the extent that they have. If anything the only other elements of society that have prospered are criminals and taxi thugs. Good job guys!

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: