You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Zuma to be eligible for parole after around 4 months, says minister

Zuma will be held in isolation for 14 days in line with Covid-19 protocols, he said.
Image: Moneyweb

South Africa’s former president Jacob Zuma, who has been in police detention since Wednesday night as he starts a 15-month prison sentence for contempt, will be eligible for parole after around four months, the justice minister said.

Zuma turned himself in to police overnight to begin his jail term for defying a court order to give evidence at an inquiry into corruption while he was in power from 2009 to 2018. The inquiry is led by Deputy Chief Justice Raymond Zondo.

The ability of authorities to bring Zuma to book has been seen as a major test of the rule of law in post-Apartheid South Africa, and experts said the former president’s legal options for avoiding jail were fast running out.

Read: Zuma hands himself over to police to begin sentence

Zuma will be held in isolation for 14 days in line with Covid-19 protocols, Justice Minister Ronald Lamola said on Thursday, outside Estcourt Correctional Centre, eastern South Africa, where Zuma was being held.

“This is not a moment of celebration or triumphalism, it is a moment of restraint and to be human,” he said, promising to treat Zuma like any other inmate.

Zuma, 79, has already launched legal challenges against his sentence, asking the court to cancel it on a number of grounds, including that he has been unfairly treated and that he might catch and die from Covid-19 in jail.

“There are no grounds for such an application,” Lawson Naidoo, executive secretary of the Council for the Advancement of the South African Constitution, told Reuters by telephone.

Zuma’s efforts would only work, he said, “if there was an obvious error of fact in the judgment which is not the case (or) the applicant did not participate through no fault of their own, and in this case Mr Zuma deliberately opted not to,” Naidoo said.

The court will hear his application on Monday.

Long journey to justice

Zuma denies there was widespread corruption and had thus far not cooperated with the legal process against him, maintaining that he was the victim of a political witch-hunt.

But the ex-leader’s predicament represents a significant fall for one of the leading figures of the ruling African National Congress (ANC), which struggled against white minority rule to establish equality before the law for all citizens.

Zuma’s alleged tendency to flout that very law since becoming one of the ANC’s most powerful politicians alarmed many of his former comrades and triggered several court cases against him.

The Zondo Commission is examining allegations that he allowed three Indian-born businessmen, Atul, Ajay and Rajesh Gupta, to plunder state resources and traffic influence over government policy. He and the Gupta brothers, who fled to Dubai after Zuma was ousted, deny any wrongdoing.

Zuma also faces a separate case relating to a $2 billion arms deal in 1999 when he was deputy president. He denies the charges.

Though he did eventually turn himself in, Zuma initially showed no signs of willingness to obey the courts, holing himself up in his home in the town of Nkandla surrounded by supporters, some of them armed with guns and spears.

“It is tempting to regard Mr Zuma’s arrest as the end of the road. But this is merely another phase in what we believe will be a long and fraught journey,” the Nelson Mandela Foundation said in a statement.

“It is vital that Mr Zuma and his supporters be held accountable every step of the way,” it added.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Can someone get a gofundme together to have the old man shanked in the showers.

I will be very surprised if he serves two weeks.

But then do the same for everyone, release all the prisoners at the same time.

What makes him different?

Parole is for good behaviour and remorse for wrongdoing, no?

Bet he wont be remorseful and will cause as much trouble as possible.

But they will still let him out.

This country is an absolute joke under the ANC.

Where does DCS get ¼ served?

ConCourt did not specify parole minimum therefore Section 73(6)(a) of Correctional Services Act would apply and it starts after half term??? Unless law recently changed

Self – correct : because prisoner Zuma was sentenced to less than 24 months, he can be considered after a quarter.

Home by Christmas – unless he re-offends. Zondo should re-subpoena prisoner Zuma…

Let me look into my crystal ball and predict the future…

Zuma will be in isolation for 14 days…

On day 13 he will contract Covid and be admitted to hospital.

He will spend at least 1 month in hospital for treatment and the rest of the time as an out-patient.

He will be released on parole in the 4th month.

anybody want to make a wager?

R50 he already has covid as he has been running around without a mask for days now.

I would rather contribute to Skurwe Brak’s gofundme fund…thank you!

If a serving Minister can predict that a prisoner can be released after 4 months whilst serving a 15 month jail sentence, right at the start of the sentence demonstrates that the the whole penal system is corrupt.

They say he is a normal person being treated like other prisoners. Why then does the minister visit him in jail ? Janusz Walus has been in jail for 28 years without parole.

This is why the whole S.A. criminal justice system is a joke!! It is inherently “criminal friendly” and is layered with all manner of caveats and loopholes. It is designed to let criminals off the hook as soon as possible, potentially to re-offend.

What should happen, is that because he refused to hand himself in by day 5, hat should constitute a further contempt of court action and a ruling that a further 15 months be added to his sentence to run consecutively.

I suspect he became a fugitive from justice for not turning himself in, which was probably another criminal offence.

Perhaps he should be regarded as a habitual offender and be denied any parole.

End of comments.





Follow us: