Financing solutions for emerging farmers to become more innovative

As drought maintains its grip on crops, emerging farmers face a double whammy as they battle to access finance without land ownership as collateral.
Collaborations could see a bank providing production funding and an insurer providing an insurance component to enhance risk mitigation. Picture: Dean Hutton, Bloomberg

The prolonged drought has exacted a toll with a negative impact on the yields of major summer crops this year. According to Statistics SA, the production of maize, soybeans and sunflower seeds is expected to be down 13%, 16% and 29% respectively from last year.

Drought impact aside, emerging farmers who do not own land find it near impossible to get a loan from a commercial bank. In his state of the nation address (Sona) last week, President Cyril Ramaphosa said that over the medium-term budget period, R3.9 billion had been allocated to the Land Bank to support black commercial farmers. But is this enough to address the financing challenges in the agricultural industry?

Read: Extreme weather is shaking up Africa’s corn trade

Narrowed margins and lower outputs

Requier Wait, head of economics and trade at Agri SA, says farmers face two general challenges.

“The first is that farmers absorb price impact and cannot pass on cost increases to consumers. In the global context, there is increased competition, which places downward pressure on output prices. However, South African agriculture receives relatively limited government support, as compared to many other global competitors. This can be seen from the OECD’s Producer Support Estimate (PSE) figures. Higher input costs, for example, electricity and diesel fuel, cannot be passed on to consumers,” he says.

Wait explains that absorbing these increases affects farmers’ margins, leaving them with no option but to improve their efficiency by achieving economies of scale, leveraging technology and adopting precision farming methods.

The second big challenge relates to dry weather conditions and areas affected by longer-term drought, which impacts output levels. Lower output, depending on market prices, can result in lower revenues. However, Wait notes that the impact of drought can extend beyond the drought period itself, for example lower yields for horticultural products in the following season.

Wait notes that in terms of loans in the commercial agriculture sector, the ratio of total farm debt to total farming assets is still favourable. “We are still seeing investment taking place, with emphasis on investment in machinery and implements as farmers attempt to improve productivity in order to sustain current operations,” he says.

Innovative funding models required

Dawie Maree, head of agriculture information and marketing at FNB, points out that the average production loan for a grain farmer that plants roughly 1 000 hectares of maize per year is R10 million a year. He admits that offering loans to farmers who do not hold the title deeds to the land they farm remains a major risk for banks.

Nico Groenewald, head of agribusiness at Standard Bank, agrees. “There is significant room for growth and banks across the board need to find more innovative ways to increase funding to emerging farmers, specifically black emerging farmers. Agriculture and land policy certainty coupled with an effective disbursement of government grants to deserving farmers would further support banks safely leveraging [the] balance sheets of emerging farmers,” Groenewald says.

Maree says FNB typically runs an overdraft type of facility that is renewable every year but in the case of farmers who don’t own the land they farm, with little or no security, there is escalated risk for the banks. “Personal loans are an option but this is not ideal,” he says. In terms of both the Banks Act and the National Credit Act lenders have to look at affordability and the ability of the applicant to repay the loan.

Blended finance a possible solution

Maree goes on to say that in many countries, governments subsidise insurance premiums to assist farmers who want to mitigate the risk of climate volatility. “For example, in the US half of the insurance premium is subsidised, resulting in 85% of the crops being insured,” he says.

FNB is in the process of establishing a fund using its own corporate social investment funds as well as development funds from the international community to assist farmers without security. Maree says no definite timeline has been set but that the fund could be launched within the next year.

“As the financial sector, we need to ensure that everybody gets financing at a reasonable rate that allows them to be profitable,” he says. “We need to refigure our financial models.” This includes developing more complex credit structures with blended finance to help with access to markets, skills and funding, he adds.

Blended finance is broadly seen as the combination of official development assistance with private or public resources, with the aim of leveraging development finance from other players.


Groenewald says that until recently Standard Bank had a credit line in place to assist emerging farmers on an individual basis in applying for production credit and loans. However, the bank has changed its focus and moved to collaboration with organised industry bodies who can also support emerging farmers with production finance and technical support. “This type of collaboration appears to be more effective to service a broader base of similar farmers – and provides a framework for technical support too, limiting production risk. We hope to announce the next collaboration framework before the summer planting season,” he says.

Standard Bank recently joined forces with the University of the Free State and the Free State Department of Agriculture to put together a comprehensive programme that will train and equip emerging farmers. “The department has already identified more than 22 farmers for participation in the programme with the aim to move this up to 50 farmers,” says Groenewald. “Our role is to provide financial guidance and ultimately consider financial assistance. The aim is to build this out to a broader audience once the project proves successful.”

Standard Bank is also working with an insurer on a combined project where the applicant or farmer will apply for production funding, with the insurer providing an insurance solution as part of the risk mitigation. Groenewald was not able to name the insurance company that is partnering with the bank at this point, but said the programme should commence in summer.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


The assumption is made that the land will have value that will then assist the emerging farmer to get loans. All good and well.

If the state expropriates all the land and government owns it obviously it wont work as the state is the owner.

If you expropriate land (without compensation) and only one race group can then own land the market will be destroyed. You will have sellers of land but no buyers.

If land is given away for free would the previously disadvantaged pay money for it? No they wont as it is given away to them for free.

If the previously advantaged have been expropriated without compensation will they pay money AGAIN to buy land. No they wont.

If you have no buyers in the market the value of the land will be destroyed. So who will take it as collateral?

you are quite right- the “value” of anything is determined by what a purchaser is prepared to pay for it in an open market. So their farms will have no “value” to use as collateral. Just another bit of ANC myth/lies /propaganda/disinfo that redistribution of land to the “people” will create wealth.Like in Zim.

There is only one finance solution that can fund emerging farmers in a sustainable manner. This finance model is called a donation, handout or gift. The failure rate for emerging farmers will be the same as for emerging bankers, emerging pro golfers, emerging orthodontists and emerging municipal managers. That is a 95% failure rate.

Given the ANC and Africa’s track record I think 95% failure rate is bit optimistic.More like 150% because they destroy infrastructure as well forever.

I’m not sure about that Sensei; or maybe you jest. A friend migrated to a 1st world country and bought a farm in a smallish area doing a specif crop. Wasn’t easy but the product grown had a whole infrastructure behind it that advised him on every aspect of production, offered expert solutions and finance and basically held is hand through the learning process, never for free. He had to pay a levy from his crop and it was marketed through the organisation. All he had to do was work; very, very hard.

He has done handsomely. The product demand has rocketed almost everywhere in the world; maybe luck but also intensive marketing by the organisation with the government solidly behind it. Pick the right product and this can work in SA, well should I say, might have worked at one time.

I certainly do not downplay the value of hard work. Farming, especially crop production, is a highly competitive business. The purchasing price of the farm is a function of the profitability and cash flow of the best farmers in the region. The most efficient and most pragmatic farmers want to expand their business and they determine the price of land. This leaves the emerging farmer at a distinct disadvantage because he has to pay a high price for land that is way above the level of cash flow he can generate on it with his skill set.

Imports of subsidised products mean that local farmers actually compete with international governments. The profit margins are squeezed to be almost non-existent. Then comes the weather- and political risk plus the cost of capital that is 300% higher locally than for the international competitors. South Africa is not an agriculturally friendly nation. Then we have the downward spiral in the real price of agricultural commodities that is the result of Quantitative Easing in first-world countries. In effect, the measures that are implemented to rescue the international banks, are bankrupting farmers in third world countries.

The financial survival of most farmers depends on inflation driving up the value of their land. They have positive cash flow because they are actually monetizing the value of their properties through collateralized bank loans.

In my local farming community, people say that a farmer is a child molester if he hands his average size farm over to his son. This is because the push towards large, company-owned farms is so overwhelmingly strong.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: