Food security ‘experts’ don’t have all the answers

Community knowledge is key.
Professor Julian May examining food supplies in the home of Brenda Siko, who runs an unregistered early childhood development centre in Worcester’s Mandela Square informal settlement. Image: Ashraf Hendricks

South Africa is in the grips of a food system paradox. It’s a country known for its agricultural production and has a sophisticated policy framework. Yet, millions of its residents are malnourished. Nearly one in four children are stunted as a result of their mother’s poor nutrition during pregnancy and their own malnutrition in early life.

It is a complex crisis. And responding to it is being made even harder as climate change increasingly hits food production. Evidence suggests that wildfires, irregular rainfall, heat and droughts will increasingly endanger agricultural production. This will threaten jobs in the agricultural sector. It will also affect the quantity, quality and price of food.

Too often, potential responses or solutions don’t take people’s own daily experiences into account. Researchers fall into the trap of habitual thinking. They make assumptions. But they do not listen to or learn from communities on the front lines of the crisis.

That’s why, in a rural South African town, we adopted a “learning journey” approach. This is an innovative research process whereby a broad and inclusive range of participants literally undertake a journey to explore a complex system and gain firsthand experience of problems.

During several “learning journeys”, both we and the research participants gained new perspectives on the complexity of processes related to food. Rather than looking at the issue generally, we were able to home in on place-based challenges – and potential solutions. This breaks with traditional modes of thinking that focus on “one size fits all” solutions.

Participants were empowered to take stock of existing local potential. They identified local assets such as crèches and informal traders that might be used to tackle elements of the food system crisis. The research also reminded us, powerfully, that people don’t live in economic sectors. They live in places.

Immersing into Worcester

Worcester is about 110 kilometres from Cape Town in South Africa’s Western Cape province and has a population of nearly 128,000.

It is typical of many rural towns in South Africa with a stark reality: a quarter of its children under five are malnourished. Many adults subsist on nutritionally poor diets, resulting in poor health outcomes like obesity.

Our research group has conducted three learning journeys in Worcester since late 2021. Participants include community members, local and provincial government officials, academics, activists, food advocacy groups and early childhood development practitioners. Together we have visited sites where residents procure both monthly staples and fresh fruit and vegetables and where early childhood development facilities are concentrated. It’s in these places that many Worcester residents purchase food and young children receive both care and food.

Immersing into these places, hosted by people affected by the food system, revealed how different systems overlap to shape dietary health.

The “learning journeys” offered valuable insights. For instance, it emerged that crime is a problem for food retailers as much as for consumers. Without adequate safety, people are vulnerable to crime. Another issue is that a great deal of the fresh produce sold by retailers in Worcester is sourced in Cape Town, rather than locally. This transportation of food, particularly fresh vegetables – when the same produce is grown locally – raises costs and is bad for the environment.

Street traders and spaza shops – small, informal food retailers that are often home-based – did much better in this regard. They offered reasonably priced and diverse fruit and vegetables sourced from local farms.

It also became clear that early childhood development centres play a potentially crucial role in providing nutrition to young children. But school principals complained that it was difficult to officially register their institutions. This prevented them from getting government subsidies to help feed children and from accessing land which they wished to use for food gardens.

After each “learning journey”, participants gathered for “learning labs”. There, people shared their experiences and insights. This is a way for everyone to share their knowledge – and to recognise that “experts” don’t have all the answers. A ward councillor reflected that when programmes don’t address food explicitly, they too often have a negative effect and perpetuate the ills in the food system.

Consolidating learning, committing to action

In the final session, representatives from the provincial and local governments and from civil society organisations identified new opportunities for collaboration and implementation.

First, the lessons of this research will be complemented with detailed urban food system mapping data using household surveys. This will be paired with spatial modelling approaches, enabling town planners to predict the likely effect of external shocks to the food system, such as those caused by climate change. They can then take local, targeted mitigating actions.

Work will also be conducted to help local government use food systems management to try to offset the negative impacts of climate change. The Breede Valley Municipality, of which Worcester is part, will be a critical partner throughout this process.

If a climate-resilient food system is to emerge in Worcester, or in similar towns throughout South Africa, it is clear that it will only do so through local cooperation, knowledge co-production, collective action, and the creation of a shared vision of what a socially just and sustainable food system looks like. We believe that our work in Worcester is an important early step in this process.The Conversation

Scott Drimie, Adjunct Professor, Stellenbosch University and Michelle Eichinger, Researcher at the Institute for Environmental Studies, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


SA does not have a “food” problem.
We have an unemployment problem that is a direct result of the misguided ANC policies that the peeple voted for —
You get exactly what you voted for — Enjoy !!!!!!!!!

The relatively high incidence of malnutrition, and the physical and mental consequences, are very sad. The fact that it is preventable makes it even worse. Society as a whole carries the burden when 30% of the voting population has stunted mental and physical development due to malnutrition. You can imagine how this creates a negative feedback loop that impacts food production negatively through the political economy, but that is a topic for another day.

I have been in the business of providing food all my life. I am the 4th generation farmer on this property. My family has been turning sunshine and rain into nutritious and palatable products for human consumption for more than 100 years. I think this qualifies me to have an opinion about the topic.

The combination of the social grant and the efficiency of the retail sector to deliver affordable food, creates a barrier to entry into subsistence farming. If those who receive social grants want to put food on the table, they will be more efficient if they used the grant to buy food at Shoprite, than to produce that food themselves. The economies of scale put enormous pressure on the producers as well as the distributors and retailers to deliver the best products at the best price. A small-scale producer simply cannot compete with the big guys. It will be a waste of money to use his grant to produce food in competition with Shoprite. African communities that typically rely on subsistence farming do not have access to the social grant scheme that we have here. They have no alternative but to produce their own food.

That brings us closer to the point. Farmers don’t provide food to consumers. An economic system does that. The farmer knows his soil and he uses it in combination with sunshine and rain to produce food, but he needs cash flow as a catalyst in this complex process. The farmworker reports to the farmer. The farmer reports to his bank manager, who reports to his regional manager, who reports to his boss in Johburg, who reports to the Governor of the Reserve Bank, who reports to the president. There you have it – the president is the ultimate farmer. The rest of us are mere intermediaries in this process.

If food security depends on an economic system, what does an economic system depends upon? Property rights are the answer to that question. The right to own the fruits of your labor enables and motivates all the various parties in the production chain to cooperate in the process to feed the consumer. This is a miraculous process of mutually beneficial and free cooperation under the force of competitive behavior that ultimately benefits the consumer.

Now, we have reached the point. When a government confiscates property as they did in Zimbabwe, or taxes it into extinction like in South Africa, it destroys the basis of the production process. The farmer’s access to cash flow depends on his title deed. No title deed, or a title deed that is encumbered by various socialist taxes, leads to malnutrition through a mechanism called the Tragedy of the Commons under the overriding force of the Malthusian Trap. There is no food insecurity in Europe or the USA because those nations protect property rights. Malnutrition is rife in Africa because these societies are communalist in nature. Their chosen political-economic systems starve them. It is their democratic choice.

To cut a long story short – if there is malnutrition, the president of the nation has really stuffed up badly.

Well done Sensei. I am also a 4th generation farm owner but probably the last, I do not have the stomach for it anymore and would not want any of my children to be farmers in the ANC SA. It is going to end in tears.

Outside of the protected loop, mainly limited to non food crops (sugar, timber and the like) which have blighted much of SA’s grassland and forest, farmers face massive challenges, as you note, from EWC and crime through to electricity and fuel. I do not see anything changing, or the ruling regime wanting it to change. In fact the opposite. Good luck to the poor, check who you voted for.

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: