You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Magashule’s fatally-flawed court challenge

It was in the ANC’s best interests to act upon corruption swiftly and efficiently – court.
Ace Magashule. Image: Rogan Ward, Reuters

In a judgment handed down by the High Court Gauteng Division on July 9, 2021, Ace Magashule lost his court case in which he had challenged his suspension from the ANC.

Magashule contended that his suspension as Secretary General of the ANC was unlawful and unconstitutional in terms of both the ANC constitution and the Constitution of South Africa. He argued that his suspension denied him the right of a hearing, the presumption of innocence, the right to equality, and the right to dignity.

The respondents, ANC President Cyril Ramaphosa; ANC Deputy Secretary General (DSG) Jessie Duarte, and the ANC, opposed his contentions. They argued that the interests and the integrity of the ANC in fighting corruption provided the overarching basis for his suspension, and that his rights were not violated.

Background

At the 54th National Conference of the ANC held at Nasrec (Conference) in December 2017, concern was raised about the impact of corruption on the affairs of the ANC, and its sustainability as a political party.

The conference committed to “isolate and root out corrupt tendencies in the public and private sectors”. The threat of the loss of confidence in the ANC because of corruption was included in the conference report. It was resolved that the ANC should take decisive action against all members involved in corruption.

It was further resolved that every cadre “accused of, or reported to be involved in” corrupt practices accounts to the Integrity Committee (IC) immediately, and that the ANC would summarily suspend someone who failed to give an acceptable explanation or to voluntarily step down while they face disciplinary, investigative or prosecutorial procedures.

The step-aside rule had already been adopted in a resolution at the ANC’s 4th National General Council (NGC) in October 2015.

The ANC IC was established under Rule 24 of the ANC constitution. Rule 24.2 essentially provides that any unethical or immoral conduct by a member that can bring the ANC into disrepute should be brought to the IC’s attention.

The step-aside principle was further evolved at the NEC meeting of July 31 to August 2, 2020.

In November 2020, the National Prosecuting Authority (NPA) charged Magashule with several criminal offences, including fraud, corruption and money-laundering relating to his tenure as former premier of the Free State from 2009 to 2017.

Following his indictment, Magashule appeared before the IC on December 12, 2020.

On May 3, 2021, the DSG informed Magashule that he was temporarily suspended.

Judgment

The court recognised that the matter before it concerned a dispute within the ANC, essentially a “private dispute between members of a private organisation”.

The court opined that courts have previously found that, “a political party is a voluntary association founded on the basis of mutual agreement”, and added that the political party must be consistent with the Constitution.

Magashule’s contentions and the court’s finding have been summarised:

  • Magashule claimed that his suspension as secretary general of the ANC was unlawful and unconstitutional in terms of both the ANC constitution as well as the Constitution of South Africa, and that the that the NPA charges against him “are frivolous and unsustainable”. The court however noted that Magashule “is being prosecuted on very serious charges of corruption, fraud and money-laundering”.
  • Magashule argued that being suspended before he was convicted in a court violates the principle of the presumption of innocence. This was dismissed by the court, which held that the presumption of innocence is a specified constitutional right that arises only in the context of an accused’s right to a fair trial in criminal proceedings.
  • Magashule also argued that he was not given a hearing. The court found that Magashule was afforded a hearing before he was suspended, and that he participated in all the processes relating to the development, formulation, and adoption of the resolutions of the 54th National Conference regarding this matter, including the resolutions of the NEC that resulted in the formulation of the guidelines on the implementation of the step-aside principle.

The court reasoned that Magashule should have been aware “that he fell into the category of members of the ANC who had been indicted for serious criminal offences”, and that it was in the interests of the ANC to act upon corruption swiftly and efficiently.

The court dismissed Magashule’s contention that the ANC step-aside rule and the suspension letter issued to him was unlawful, unconstitutional and invalid. The court also dismissed Magashule’s suspension of Ramaphosa. Costs were awarded against Magashule.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   3

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

Magashule is the new poster-child for ‘delusionsal’.

Mark my words: Ace will become SA’s future president (…if I look at the way things are going on the past few days)

Not flawed.

Part of a possible Coup d’etat strategy (…I’m sorry to say).

Where do these guys get the money to take on the highest and most expensive courts in the land and keep on losing?

Follow the money

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR
BTC / USD

Podcasts

INSIDER SUBSCRIPTIONS APP VIDEOS RADIO / LISTEN LIVE SHOP OFFERS WEBINARS NEWSLETTERS TRENDING PORTFOLIO TOOL CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: