Proudly sponsored by

Matjila says from his experience, Ayo’s valuation was ‘reasonable’

PIC paid the highest asking price for Ayo Technology, and its former CEO sees nothing wrong with that.
Ayo was offered to the public at between R28 and R43 a share. The PIC elected to pay R43. The share is currently trading at R9. Image: Moneyweb

The valuation of Ayo Technology Solutions was “reasonable”, according to former Public Investment Corporation (PIC) chief executive Dan Matjila.

Matjila was speaking before the PIC Commission of Inquiry in his penultimate week testifying on the issues of impropriety and governance lapses regarding certain investments by the institution.

Ayo listed in December 2017. In its initial public offering (IPO) the company placed its share price at R43 per share, valuing Ayo at R14.8 billion even though the company had net assets of R292 million. 

Contrary to Matjila’s statement that it was fair, PIC employees who worked on the transaction and former Ayo executives have come before the commission and testified that the company was overvalued and stretched. Some of these employees said they had voiced their concerns to Matjila, but to no avail. 

Ayo had a plan 

The PIC was the only buyer of Ayo’s shares at the listing, purchasing 29% of the company worth R4.3 billion at the requested price of R43 per share.

Matjila explained to the commissioners that, as an ICT company, Ayo’s net assets were not an indication of its investment potential. 

“The real investment potential lies in its contracts and deal pipeline,” said Matjila. 

Read: Ayo valuation ‘stretched’ to meet Survé’s demands

The main driver behind the PIC paying the premium price for Ayo’s shares was the understanding that the company would buy 30% of British Telecom SA (BT-SA) from Survé’s African Equity Empowerment Investments (AEEI) for R1 billion. 

The result of this strategic partnership would see some of BT-SA’s clients transferred to Ayo – the primary client at the time being Sasol, which had been affected by changes to one of the BEE codes and needed BT-SA to change its structure to be more transformed in order to attain an extended seven-year contract with the energy and chemical company.

But the BTSA transaction never materialised after it was blocked by BT , which said it never approved the sale. Reports from a meeting between Ayo’s executives show that when the deal fell through, Survé attempted to keep this information from the PIC.

Read: Iqbal Survé’s R50bn grand plan for Ayo

Survé previously testified that the “toxic” reporting around Ayo while the BT-SA transaction was in progress is the reason the deal did not materialise. 

Ayo could have been cheaper

Matjila previously told commissioners that certain parts of the investment vetting process had been skipped when the Ayo deal was concluded because the PIC was chasing a tight listing deadline – and, because the company listed in December, a lot of the relevant individuals at the PIC were on holiday. 

As a consequence, the PIC used Ayo’s draft pre-listing statement as a basis for evaluating the company because it consisted of most of the work the PIC would had to have done in its assessment of the company. Matjila said this was fairly common in the consideration of initial public offerings.

Read: Ayo ex-CIO says company is partly illegitimate

On Thursday it was revealed that Ayo’s draft pre-listing statement had placed the issue price at between R28 and R43 a share. Despite this, the PIC did not negotiate for a lower share price even though it was the only buyer of Ayo’s shares. 

PIC assistant portfolio manager Victor Seanie previously testified that the Ayo deal was a “foregone conclusion” and said the deal team was never allowed to negotiate the price despite this being fairly normal when institutional investors are offered shares in an IPO. 

Seanie said he had communicated his view that the R43 price tag was excessive with two of his superiors who both agreed with him, but when the team questioned the R43 price, they were told that “it can’t be changed”.

Ayo just needs strong leadership

Matjila acknowledged that Ayo’s share price – which currently sits at R9 – “has not performed as anticipated”. He attributed this to the deal pipeline not materialising, negative media reporting, litigation against the company to try and reclaim the investment, and testimony before the commission. 

He said the share price merely reflects the current net asset value of the company without future opportunities, saying the PIC needs to intervene as a significant shareholder to “put together stronger management and board in order to start driving the company’s affairs forward”.

Ayo downward trajectory




Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


What we have here is a picture post card of the new South Africa.
Incompetents in high places, a portrayal of the ANC’c finest in a action.
Already the GEPF is in deep trouble, and the rest of the Pensions / savings industry in their sights.
Matjila has done nothing wrong, Magashula likewise, Zuma likewise, the list goes on. And the party faithful follow them to the slaughter.

just the fact that they can’t see where they went wrong or made wrong management decisions, confirms once again “another person in a political cadre position that should not be there in the first place”. then the the nerve to believe the trash that oneself is talking in the public domain is all correct and ok and everybody in public will believe it. incompetence is my first, middle and last name.

Maybe that’s the whole problem. “His Experience”

Yip, you right, could be that for a change it’s not a lie, just got absolutely no experience! One or the other, or both, is the constant State of the ANC!

Matjila – just another useless and incompetent BBBEE appointment!

The PIC investment in AYO was just orchestrated theft on a grand scale

This Ayo conduit would’ve allowed Surve to pay back the loan he received from the PIC to buy Independent with its own money! Wonderful, these big ‘transformation’ deals.

You have to ask why the PIC has not gone after Surve for the part of the loan for which he signed personal security.

Another way to Surve the Gupta’s!!!???

Oh what a web we weave when we seek to deceive.

The PIC does NOT need to intervene as a significant shareholder to “put together stronger management and board in order to start driving the company’s affairs forward” but get its money back from this crooked investment and Matjila charged with fraud.

The frightening outcome of all of Matjila machinations is that he doesn’t believe he is ill qualified, lacks knowledge, or is incompetent – and therein lies the problem as he has absolute self belief in his competence – which to a balanced competent manager, defaults to gross incompetence

Absolutely Graham, and that imo applies to most of them in crucial positions, from the very top to the very bottom, that this country has no hope of progress , the denial runs too deep!

“Matjila acknowledged that Ayo’s share price – which currently sits at R9 – “has not performed as anticipated”. He attributed this to the deal pipeline not materialising, negative media reporting, litigation against the company to try and reclaim the investment, and testimony before the commission.”

Or could it simply be that Ayo’s assets are non-productive? And if the PIC needs to intervene, why would they need Ayo’s management?

This is such rubbish and should have been in the courts long ago.

The honesty test would be for Matjila to take his salary, bonus and golden hand shake in Ayo shares at their issue price of R48. Then lets ask, if he thinks the value was fair.

It’s other people’s money. Who cares if he overpaid by up to 5 times

Suffers from overconfidence:

“Let’s call this Level One confidence. You’re confident in something because you don’t know enough to realize how little confidence you should have. It’s driven by gut feelings and the belief that intelligence in one field justifies your expertise in another. It’s a mess, and one few people think they fall for because beliefs exempt from the nuance of real expertise are rubber stamped in your head as unequivocally true.”

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: