You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Municipalities should determine electricity supply cost – Nersa

Tariffs should be based on cost of supply studies.

Moneyweb recently reported that the electricity bill for the same business could vary by up to 72%, depending on the metro it is situated in.

The fact is that the vast majority of municipal distributors don’t properly understand what it costs to supply electricity to different categories of clients within their distribution areas, says energy expert Dr Johan Delport.

Delport has conducted the cost of supply study for Ekurhuleni, one of the few metros that have so far completed such a study. He has also completed similar studies for two secondary cities and one small local municipality.

National energy regulator Nersa has set a deadline of April 1 2017 for all municipalities to submit implementation plans for undertaking cost of supply studies. It told Moneyweb that 29 out of the 278 municipalities have responded so far.

Delport agrees that the uptake has been slow, which is a concern bearing in mind that electricity revenue is one of the major sources of income at all municipalities.

He says cost of supply studies could provide a rational basis for consumer groups to engage municipal suppliers about the fairness of tariffs before they are approved and to challenge them if users feel they are not being heard.

Municipal electricity tariffs can be quite complex, with in some cases 42 tariff variations in a metropolitan municipality. A cost of supply study would be aimed at determining the total cost of supply per tariff group, that is residential, industrial, commercial and agricultural users.

That includes bulk purchases and technical losses, the replacement value of infrastructure, salaries, maintenance and billing costs, non-technical losses which includes meter tampering and electricity theft and the profit or surplus the municipality is left with.

For the current tariff year Nersa gave a benchmark that set bulk purchases at 75% of total cost, salaries and wages at 10%, repairs at 6%, capital costs at 3% and “other costs” at 6%.

Delport says the expense of having a cost of supply study done is insignificant for a municipality. A big metro could be charged a few hundred thousand rand while their annual budgets are multiple billions of rands. If done correctly, it would however prevent a municipality from over- or undercharging its electricity customers.

While municipalities are allowed a measure of cross-subsidisation between customer groups in accordance with its policies, some of the studies that have been done so far have disclosed surprising, if not shocking results in this regard. “We have found instances where households were subsidising commercial users by 20%,” Delport says. The norm is for commercial customers to subsidise households by about 15% and the municipality in that instance had no idea of the real situation.

Delport says overcharging is however less prevalent than undercharging. In some customer categories they found undercharging equal in value to 30% of the electricity volume. That would result in a hole in the municipal purse that could weaken its finances significantly over a period.

A municipality could rectify something like that over a number of years to prevent any price shocks to consumers.

In Ekurhuleni bulk users were for example found to be undercharged and subsequent tariff applications provided for it to be progressively rectified over three years.

Tobie Nortjé, business manager at BB Energy that worked on the projects with Delport, says cost of supply studies should be repeated every five years. It is important to get the data including load profiles from the municipality. This is then analysed to get a good understanding of technical losses and to plan ahead for changes in the market, for example demand reduction due to more users using solar power.

Some of the smaller municipalities don’t have the data available, in which case data from similar distributors is used. “This is not ideal, but it at least provides some basis for the study,” Nortjé says.

In many cases municipalities’ asset registers are outdated and do not include replacement value of spares and equipment.

He says a cost of supply study is fairly quick to do and could be completed within a month or two, if the data is available. BB Energy hopes to automate subsequent cost of supply studies for its clients.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


many such reports are prepared and all sound so logical! But do the municipalities have the capacity to implement the recommendations that emanate from these reports?

Here’s an idea Nersa:if municipalities were allowed to buy electricity from RE suppliers,then the cost would be cheaper than buying from Eskom.Win-win for municipalities and their consumers.

Will this apply to those who steal electricity as well ?

Maybe Municipalities should consider:
– Why is the cost of electricity 50% more in places like Rosebank (City Power) than say Sandton (direct from Eskom). Maybe there should be one universal price?
– Why is so much electricity being stolen?
– Why do some corporate entities (like the mines) get away with paying so little for electricity?
– Why does the farming sector get away with murder at the rate they pay for electricity?

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: