Proudly sponsored by

Our heavy tax burden

The amount we pay in indirect taxes can equal the amount we pay in income tax, effectively doubling the average taxpayer’s tax rate.
No amount of tax planning can reduce the burden of indirect taxes. Picture: Dean Hutton/Bloomberg

Nobody likes to see a few thousand rand in tax disappearing straight off their salary month after month. The tax deduction might equal the instalment on a car for most people, or at least a few extra pizzas every month.

More alarming is that everybody pays thousands more in tax than our salary slips show. The range of indirect taxes – value added tax (Vat), fuel levies and other duties – increase the tax rate on an average salary from an effective rate of around 14% to nearly 30%, depending on what one considers to be an average salary in a very diverse labour market. Salaries differ significantly in different towns, and even due to personal characteristics.

Surveys by employment consultants, Stats SA and the Department of Labour give a wide range of average salaries in different industries – from an average of R6 000 a month for an office assistant to R30 000 for a computer programmer.

Stats SA’s quarterly employment survey puts the average salary in SA during the last quarter of 2018 at R21 190 per month.

This tallies with what one would consider an average job in SA. Advertisements in newspapers and on the internet indicate that a qualified nurse, electrician or accountant with a bit of experience can expect to earn R230 000 to R260 000 per annum. According to one employment agency’s website, the South African Revenue Service (Sars) itself would pay its accountants and tax consultants between R22 000 and R24 000 per month.

Illustrating the impact

A salary of around R23 000 per month will suffice to illustrate the effect of the impact of indirect taxes. The same argument will hold true for somebody who earns R4 000 per month and pays no income tax, but will pay tax of 15% on most of their income in the form of Vat every time they open their wallet in a supermarket.

According to Sars’s tax deduction tables, an individual who earns R276 000 per annum (R23 000 per month) should pay R56 313 tax per year (nearly R4 700 per month), equal to a tax rate of a shade over 20%. In reality, it is less.

The primary rebate will decrease the tax rate to around 14% for individuals below the age of 65, and a measure of tax allowances with regards to retirement annuities and medical expenses will help decrease it further, to around 11%. Good tax planning and a structured remuneration package could decrease the tax rate even more, but probably at the cost of lower cash earnings.

But no amount of tax planning can reduce the burden of indirect taxes. Everybody is aware of the increase in Vat from 14% to 15%, announced in the 2018 budget speech, but the effect of high levies on fuel and life’s sinful pleasures is even worse in terms of the rate of tax.

How it all adds up

If our average salary earner owns a car and drives the average 30 000 kilometres per annum (based on Sars’s assumption of private use of a vehicle and guidelines in the second-hand car market), they will use about 3 000 litres of fuel per annum at some 10 litres per 100 kilometres. At R5.56 in tax per litre, they will pay a massive R16 890 in fuel tax every year.

The balance of our average taxpayer’s salary can result in another R25 000 finding its way to Sars in the form of Vat, depending on how much an individual spends and saves and the products they buy.

A daily packet of (legal) cigarettes will contribute another R15.52 (R5 640 per annum) to government’s treasure chest and a few glasses of beer, wine or brandy can easily add another R3 000 per annum. Spirits are taxed at nearly R46 per bottle, while the sugar tax adds R2.80 to a two-litre bottle of Coke.

Adding a few hundred for property tax, but disregarding capital gains tax and refusing to pay e-tolls, will result in a total tax bill of around R84 000 per annum (R7 000 per month). This means anybody with an average job and average salary pays up to 30% of their income towards tax.

The argument holds true for people earning more as well. Firstly, SA’s progressive tax system taxes higher earners at a higher rate, while people with more money will spend more and drive more. They are also likely to pay more in property tax as well as a bit of capital gains tax from time to time.

Not much bang for our tax buck

However, it is not only the amount of tax or the effective tax rate when including indirect taxes that is making taxpayers unhappy, but rather the impression that we are not getting value for our money.

Government services, for the most part, do not come close to meeting expectations. Just about every government department admits that its service delivery is not up to standard, be it state hospitals, public transport, government schools, safety and security or maintenance of roads. In most municipalities finances and service delivery are in disarray, while Eskom struggles to deliver uninterrupted electricity.

Read: The problems with Eskom’s load shedding plan

The inefficiency of government is akin to an additional tax as taxpayers need to supplement government services – whether in the form of a back-up generator, expensive medical cover, the services of a private security company, private schools or extra English lessons. This ‘inefficiency tax’ can even extend higher, to life and short-term insurance premiums due to government’s failure to uphold law and order to an acceptable standard.

Tax compliance

The level of tax and what taxpayers get in return in terms of services, as well as the quality of these services, are important aspects that make people question our tax regime and raise concerns about tax compliance.

Johan Rossouw, economist at Vunani Securities, says most taxpayers probably think they are paying too much tax, especially in light of what we really receive for our tax money. “We probably don’t compare well with the rest of the world when comparing our tax rate with what we receive in services.”

Comparing tax rates between countries is complex due to huge differences in tax brackets and significant differences between statutory tax rates and effective tax rates. It is easy to refer to tax rates in extreme cases, such as Sweden, Denmark and Finland, which have maximum marginal income tax rates of around 55% and sales tax as high as 25%. But citizens receive good schooling and healthcare, without direct payment (although there are concerns about whether their government spending is sustainable).

Oil-rich countries in the Middle East are at the other end of the scale, with excellent services at a tax rate of less than 2% and seemingly no constraints on state budgets.

Tipping point

In SA, taxpayers are increasingly of the view that we already pay too much tax and are close to the point where any further increases will result in more tax evasion or a total refusal to pay tax, in a similar vein to the e-tolls boycott.

“I don’t believe we are at this point yet, but we are probably high on the curve,” says Rossouw, referring to the so-called Laffer Curve, which shows how government revenue increases as tax rates increase, but only up to a certain point. Thereafter tax revenue decreases since there is little incentive for people to work harder if government takes most of the extra income, as well an increase in tax evasion.

“A big concern in SA is the belief that our taxes are not going towards what they are meant for,” says Rossouw. “The general view is that too much disappears due to corruption, theft and inefficiency.”

Hugo Pienaar, economist at the Bureau for Economic Research at the University of Stellenbosch, says the tipping point of tax collection is not a specific figure or an absolute percentage. “Some people might already be inclined to try and evade tax. It is one of the tax authorities’ current challenges – to restore taxpayer confidence.

“It is interesting to note that government’s tax income as percentage of the size of the economy declined during the last few years, despite the introduction of new taxes to the tune of R92 billion since 2016,” says Pienaar. “The decrease in tax revenue versus the GDP could be the result of lower economic growth or inefficiency in tax collections, which might include a proportion of tax fatigue.”

Tax revenue as a percentage of GDP

Source: National Treasury

Rossouw and Pienaar both mention that government’s ability to ensure law and order, policy certainty, acceptable service delivery and proper strategic planning with regards to economic and business issues are necessary to rebuild a good relationship with taxpayers to ensure that people feel the heavy tax burden is fair and reasonable.

Read: Helen Zille’s tax revolt: Could it work?




Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


In France the different taxes take 46% of the GDP, Sweden 44%, Germany 37%, Switzerland 28%, USA 27%. In SA the 26% is well below most of the developed countries, but of course you get far more benefits for your taxes in those countries.

You see I don’t mind paying 80% tax, but then I want everything sorted. Housing, Transport, education, medical, retirement etc.

Consider this, South Africans security (public and private) costs the same as Germany, yes our safety is worse than countries which are in full blow war.

The anc Goverment does not deliver services, that is why we have seen a tax revolt in the form of people with skills leaving the country.

Yip …. and per month add medical aid R2500 /R5000, Security – R500, Insurance – R3000, retirement R5000 and there’s very little left.

Once again – everybody is missing the point.

The fraction of GDP taken for taxes (for example) is wholly irrelevant in SA (and countries alike).

i. The only relevant figure, regarding tax revenue as a fraction of any economic activity, is the fraction/percentage of working-age adults that GENERATE tax revenue (viz not ‘pay taxes’ – but GENERATE tax revenue).

Eg you do not generate tax revenue when you work for the government (or one of its proxies, or have a fake BEE job, or get some other form of hand-out) – you are simply regurgitating tax revenue – or some other form of revenue (by adding more expenses in the process – INSANITY!).

Practical example: there are municipalities that spend more than ninety percent of their income on salaries; such municipalities can physically not afford to do anything – they do not have money to do anything. INSANITY!

It is not difficult, for a bona fide mathematically (viz statistics) literate person to determine the figure cited in i. above, but the regime NEVER will.

The ‘percentage of working-age adults who generate tax revenue‘ will highlight (in the cold light of day) the fact that less than five percent of SA generate more than ninety-five percent of SA’s tax revenue – but more so: less than five percent generate ALL economic wealth in SA, while the rest is one form of welfare hand-out, or the other.

The second (of many) misnomers, is the actual size of SA’s economy, measured by GDP (if you wish).

ii. SA’s economy is much larger than what is reported. Is this good news? I am not so sure.

It means that the tax revenue collected, as a fraction of the real GDP, is much smaller than reported. Thus, the fraction of those generating tax revenue, is likely even less than what I noted above.

In short: if the regime wants more taxes (to put in their own pockets – read: GANGSTER STATE) – they will have to go to those that are getting HAND-OUTS FOR VOTES and those that PAY FOR NOTHING (eg 80% of electricity users in Soweto) – but that is physically impossible; GO FIGURE…

Perhaps your argument would be clearer if you spoke about generating “wealth” rather than “tax revenue”, a figure which SARS has no qualms over manipulating. To be fair, the PAYE paid by parasitic civil-servant cadres is a form of recoupment.

The two most important statistics in SA are surely the number of people who go to bed hungry (even those who do not regard this as a moral or social problem must concede that it feeds the politics of envy, resentment and destruction) and the state-school cohort fail rate [the number of kids left without the ability to sustain themselves, either through employment or further study) which actually is the driver of the future hungry-rate.

The tax is supposed to be a transaction, not a donation. When we pay an amount and get nothing in return it is called a charitable donation. When the voting majority abuse their legislative powers to extort charitable donations from the minority it is called legalized plunder.

We’ve only seen the tip of the proverbial iceberg so far. More to come and that means more direct and indirect tax increases I’m afraid. It seems perverse to work harder to try to carve out a better life for yourself and your family and then be penalised for this with more taxes? What about the loaf-abouts that sit back and wait for those grants, or the ones that pop out a baby every 9 months for the same? Is our so called system actually not encouraging this? Taking all of the above into account it’s no wonder our GDP is laughable. I suppose this is our lot for letting delusional and self entitled socialists run the (side) show.

The true measure of the value of what the the State provides is to see if our ruling elite uses these services . The answer is clearly no !

The South African politician typically uses the following because they have no FAITH IN THEIR OWN INSTITUTIONS so they do the following .

1. They go to Private Hospitals . So do their families .
2. They use private Security Firms . SAP not good enough .
3. They send their children to Private Schools .

An indication of how bad our institutions are even though they are funded by billions of Rands of taxpayers money .

Andrew: THIS STINKS! I wonder why the Opposition parties never say anything about this sick situation in Parliament.

Salary increases in the private sector are almost non-existant and these people have to survive and hang onto their jobs.

In the government sector salaries and increases are over the top. In spite of this many of these “employees” feel that they need to engage in corruption so they can elevate their living standards.

The government needs a reality check. The golden goose is dying quickly.

I think also about our municipal rates and taxes, the cross-subsidization of the free water and electricity, the security costs we have to incur, the costs we pay for government services such as for drivers licenses, passports, toll roads, etc. These are just few and there are many more. We being taxed at levels far exceeding the PAYE / provisional taxes, etc suggest.
I’m sure if an actuary were to sit down and take time to strip out all taxes that we pay, we’d be stunned.

Increased electricity costs are a DIRECT taxation used to pay for the corrupt actions of a small gangster elite. I believe this is known as a death spiral

Simple calc if you are in the top tax bracket is that your tax rate is 53.25% assuming you do not save anything (savings attract tax on exit in most scenarios). Excludes fuel tax which is much higher and other indirect’s like rates etc.

You then spend a considerable portion of the 46.75% remaining exclusively on security, medical, schooling, transport etc.

It’s not ideal but I am quite happy to be in that scenario if at the very least, those in poverty are being uplifted.

The gov is therefore taxing the hell out of us, mismanaging every gov programme there is and stealing everything else.

Government Inefficiencies should be tax deductible….this would include Medical Aid contributions, security costs, alternate energy sources, and vehicle repairs. In my opinion.

End of comments.



Subscribe to our mailing list

* indicates required
Moneyweb newsletters

Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: