You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

PIC must receive consent from depositors on how funds are invested

The PIC Amendment Act has been signed into law
Image: Moneyweb

The Public Investment Corporation (PIC) is now required to receive a mandate from its depositors regarding how its funds are managed.

The fund manager is the largest asset manager in Africa, managing more than R1.9 trillion in assets, the majority of which are government pensions.

Read: PIC hit by Covid-19 and state capture

According to the PIC Amendment Act, which was signed into law by President Cyril Ramaphosa on Monday, the fund manager is also required to publish and submit a report on all investments to the minister of finance for tabling.

The Act also stipulates that the finance minister must table a report annually to Parliament on all investments of deposits and request approval of any significant transactions in line with the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA)

The PIC Amendment Act aims to strengthen accountability and transparency at the fund manager, following revelations at the Mpati Commission that it had been involved in a number of suspect investments, including its billion-rand investment in Iqbal Survé-linked Ayo Technology.

While the Mpati Commission’s terms of reference did not not include the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) and the Unemployment Insurance Fund (UIF), the inquiry found that the PIC’s former management did not inform the two organisations on some crucial investment decisions.

Read: The GEPF, an abused client

With regards to the PIC’s disastrous R4.3-billion in Ayo, PIC CEO Abel Sithole (who was the GEPF’s principal officer) told the commission that the PIC did not involve or inform the GEPF when it considered and made the investment in Ayo, nor did it highlight the investment in its subsequent reporting to the GEPF, but only responded when the GEPF began asking questions.

This was in contravention of the R2 billion cap on the amounts the PIC could invest in a single asset without approval by the GEPF.

Read: No more raiding the PIC ‘piggybank’

The newly-signed law also requires the PIC to have three board members selected by organised labour in the Public Service Collective Bargaining Council. Labour federation Cosatu has welcomed this move as it will be the first time in the fund manager’s history that workers are represented on the board.

“Whilst there is no silver bullet in the fight against corruption, the PIC Amendment Act will be a critical tool in the hands of workers, Parliament, and the public,” said Cosatu.

“It will help ensure that workers’ monies are invested to protect workers’ hard-earned pensions. It will also support job creation and economic development and not simply be used to fund the pockets of crooks through get-rich-quick schemes.”

The government representative on the PIC’s board will still be decided by the minister of finance, however the amendments to the Act stipulate that the minister, in consultation with the cabinet “may designate the deputy minister of finance or any deputy minister in the economic cluster” to be appointed as chairperson of the board.

The PIC has since implemented some of the Mpati Commission’s recommendations, including revising its organisational structure which comprises the chief executive officer, chief investment officer, chief financial officer, chief operating officer, chief technology officer and chief risk officer. The Investment Committee (IC), a subcommittee of the board, is now the final approval authority for investments that are beyond management’s delegated authority.

In a statement on Wednesday, Sithole said: “Ultimately, the PIC is accountable to its clients and their beneficiaries and to the government as shareholder and guarantor of its clients. The new legislation provides for greater oversight by all stakeholders.”

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Looters anonymous !!

Sounds like Politicians and their associates will have an edge.

awesome wont put a cent in eskom debt which is a dead cat bouncing anyway

Majila and Iqbal must sit in jail

And so about 26 years too late. Ayo and its miscreants are already sitting pretty having scooped their dollop of R4,3bn and are currently awarding themselves FAT dividends for no work or actual business revenue generation. Lekka deal if you are connected to the Cadre Cartel!!!!

The ” investment” in Ayo Technologies is gone forever (into Iqbal’s pocket, and a sizable donation to Abel).

R 4,3 billion down the drain, another BEE success story.

And sticky Icky goes shopping less a commission to the ANC and judiciary

Not sure if having union representatives will lead to better investment outcomes. Protecting and growing an investment portfolio is very different to trying to preserve “jobs” and union membership fees. The union always acts in self-interest which may not be aligned with the long-term interests of the pensioners.
The articles fails to mention that the “workers, parliament and the public” have enabled corruption. Adding some more “rules” will not change this outcome in future.
Where is the fiduciary responsibility and the consequences?

Sort of, but if the coal worker union gives nod to investing in Eskom then at least they are voting their own pension money and not my taxes. Actions, consequence

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: