Pressure mounts on public protector to quit

In the most recent case, ConCourt found that Mkhwebane acted in ‘bad faith’ for rulings she made in 2017 about the Sarb.
Public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has ignited a political storm since taking office in 2016. Picture: Moneyweb

Pressure is mounting on South Africa’s anti-graft ombudsman to quit after the nation’s top court ruled she lied under oath, with a civil rights group lobbying for her to be struck from a lawyers’ roll.

Public protector Busisiwe Mkhwebane has ignited a political storm since taking office in 2016, finding President Cyril Ramaphosa in breach of the constitution and proposing changes to the central bank’s mandate. Her critics accuse her of legal incompetence and siding with a ruling party faction loosely aligned to former leader Jacob Zuma that has sought to undermine Ramaphosa and his campaign to tackle graft.

Rights group Accountability Now said it’s petitioned the Legal Practice Council to revoke Mkhwebane’s status as an advocate — a lawyer who’s allowed to present cases in the high courts and Supreme Court of Appeal. The council, a statutory body, will discuss the matter on Friday.

“If she is struck off the roll, the next step is to go to parliament and say she no longer has the capacity to fullfil her function,” Paul Hoffman, a director at Accountability Now, said by phone on Thursday.

Bad faith

South Africa’s Constitutional Court on July 22 upheld a High Court ruling that Mkhwebane didn’t understand her constitutional duty in rulings she made in 2017 about the country’s central bank. Mkhwebane put forward “a number of falsehoods” while litigating and acted in bad faith, the apex court said.

Read: Public protector must pay central bank legal costs

Public protector’s errors swamp any merits of Bankorp investigation

A day earlier, Ramaphosa described Mkhwebane’s finding that he violated the constitution and executive ethics code when he misled lawmakers about a campaign donation as “fundamentally and irretrievably flawed,” and said he’d seek an urgent judicial review. The president insisted he didn’t know about the payment made to his campaign to win control of the ruling party, inadvertently failed to disclose it and rectified his mistake as soon as possible.

Read: Ramaphosa takes public protector’s decision on review

Public enterprises minister Pravin Gordhan, who Ramaphosa appointed to stamp out rampant graft at state companies, has filed lawsuits challenging the Public Protector’s findings that he oversaw an illicit intelligence unit at the national tax agency more than a decade ago and illegally approved the early retirement of one of its top officials when he was finance minister. Successful challenges would give Mkhwebane’s detractors further ammunition.

She’s also courted further controversy by deciding to investigate whether Ramaphosa administration followed due process when it appointed a new head of South African Revenue Service, and allegations of maladministration in the agency’s recruitment processes.

Playing politics

Mkhwebane, who previously worked at the state security agency and was appointed during Zuma’s scandal-marred rule, has denied playing politics and accuses her critics of trying to stymie her investigations. She’ll oppose any bid to be struck from the lawyers’ roll, her spokesman Oupa Segalwe said by phone.

The main opposition Democratic Alliance has asked parliament to probe Mkhwebane’s fitness to hold office and the legislature’s justice committee will decide whether an inquiry is necessary. Parliament will go into recess on Friday for three weeks, delaying the conclusion of the process.

Firing the public protector requires the backing of two-thirds of lawmakers, and it’s unclear whether that threshold could be reached given deep divisions within the ruling African National Congress, which holds 230 of the 400 seats in parliament.

The fissures were starkly illustrated by revelations that Derek Hanekom, a Ramaphosa ally and member of the ANC’s National Executive Committee, collaborated with the opposition Economic Freedom Fighters in a bid to oust Zuma — which the ruling party eventually did in February last year.

ANC Secretary-General Ace Magashule, who is closely aligned to Zuma, said in a statement on Wednesday that Hanekom was “a charlatan” who was intent on dividing the party. Carl Niehaus, a Magashule aide, told Johannesburg-based broadcaster eNCA that Hanekom should be expelled from the party.

Hanekom, who openly campaigned for Zuma’s removal from office, didn’t answer calls to his mobile phone or text messages seeking comment.

© 2019 Bloomberg L.P.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


You must be signed in to comment.


We really are living in a banana republic. Every second person in political office is arguing some “abstract accusation” in court. No wonder the economy is in a shambles and the unemployed have no hope.

Fat chance of Mkhwebane quitting. The bigger the incompetent (think Zuma, Muthambi, Motsoeneng, Zwane) the more they hang onto their jobs for dear life.

Let’s see. She lied, acted in bad faith and was incompetent.

What more do you need?

And Hannekom? Seems that Zuma and Ace set up the ATM party. But for them this is not a problem?

It would seem like a no-brainer (to get rid of her) but making sense of the madness in this country is impossible.

She lied, acted in bad faith and was incompetent.

Sterling resume in ANC terms. She also has the added ability of creating “possesses” and waste money as she goes along.

Next job is life president.

The best description I have come across is from another commentator on a news site: You need a crowbar to remove a cadre from the trough.

The incumbent PP is yet another example.

Don’t let the door hit you where nature split you!

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: