You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

Renewable IPPs stunned by cabinet reshuffle – Martin

Doubt about Eskom signing deadline of April 11.
Brenda Martin is Treasurer of the South African Renewable Energy Council (SAREC)

The recent cabinet reshuffle has left the renewable energy industry in shock as the key politicians leading the implementation of government’s renewable energy independent power producer programme (REIPPP) were removed without explanation, says Brenda Martin, chairperson of the South African Renewable Energy Council (SAREC).

The moves have raised questions about the April 11 deadline for Eskom to sign outstanding and much-delayed power purchase agreements with independent power producers (IPPs).

Martin, who is also CEO of the South African Wind Energy Association (SAWEA), said at a media briefing on Monday that the removal of former energy minister Tina Joemat-Pettersson, former finance minister Pravin Gordhan and public enterprises deputy minister Bulelani Magwanishe has led to severe uncertainty among investors. “Our phones do not stop ringing [since the cabinet reshuffle on Thursday night]”.

Eskom has been vocal in its resistance to the REIPPP and has delayed signing power purchase agreements, which its acting CEO Matshela Koko has said are too costly for Eskom. Eskom currently has an oversupply of electricity from its own generation fleet, which would come a lot cheaper than the IPP-generated power, Koko said.

Martin said 37 IPPs have been left hanging for more than a year due to the Eskom delays. They represent investments of R58 billion.

After President Jacob Zuma gave an undertaking in his State of the Nation address in February that Eskom would sign the agreements in line with government policy, which would enable financial close, the industry updated its submissions to get budget quotes from Eskom. This is a prerequisite to finalising the power purchase agreements.

Martin said that even after Zuma’s pronouncement Eskom still delayed. Joemat-Pettersson then gave Eskom a deadline of April 11 for signing the outstanding IPPs.

With the cabinet reshuffle taking place shortly before the deadline, the industry now has no idea whether the agreements will be signed. “The new minister [of energy] might say she needs time to find her feet. Gigaba [finance minister] might make new arrangements about guarantees.”

The industry is further concerned that the process to finalise the Integrated Resource Plan (IRP), which maps out the country’s energy path for the next few decades, might be derailed.

The IRP basecase that was earlier released for public comment, made provision for a large portion of renewable energy and moved the date the first nuclear generation needs to be in commercial operation forward from 2025 to 2037.

Martin said the industry was trying to find out what the situation was, but its appointments with the leadership of the Department of Energy, scheduled for this week, had been cancelled by the department.

She said the initial investors understood that they were trailblazers to establish a new industry in South Africa and had to create capacity locally. They have done that and exceeded targets for social contributions and skills development. These costs were not included in the bids, she said.

These investors are now losing patience however. Some of the bigger ones said they can wait a year to see if the programme gets back on track and part of that year has already passed. Others, especially smaller companies, cannot afford to wait any longer.

SAREC treasurer Mike Levington, who is also CEO of the South African Photovoltaic Industry Association (SAPVIA), said large international investors were active in a wide variety of markets all over the world and if South Africa presents with undue risk, they would simply move their resources elsewhere.

He said sub-Saharan Africa was a strategic market for investors in the renewable energy field, due to its large number of people who are not yet served with electricity. Two years ago South Africa had strategic value as an investment destination with a view of developing business in the rest of sub-Saharan Africa, but that status is fast disappearing, he said.

There has been massive growth in the renewable energy sector in the Middle East and investors would rather open operations there, he said.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


This ridiculous situation has arisen because the ANC cannot manage one single elementary thing. The solution is simple- break Eskom up into three divisions: Electricity generation (power stations), electricity distribution (the grid) and electricity sales (ex municipality function). There is no limitation to the number of companies in each category nor any artificial barriers to entry.

Then sell the whole sorry lot and let them manage themselves as regulated monopolies answerable to their shareholders and customers.

Each company is then free to do business with each other and whomever they see fit on an arm’s length commercial basis.

This is the only way to ensure SA has sufficient energy at the right price. No economic distortions from vested interests, lobby groups, state interference and corrupt ANC politicians.

The nuke is now a sure thing, the bank accounts for the bribe money have been ready for some time.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: