Renewables peak at 19% of SA’s electricity supply

Record contribution to date occurred on the first day of November…
Image: Dwayne Senior/Bloomberg

The maximum percentage contribution by renewable sources towards electricity supplied in South Africa occurred at 13:00 on November 1 last year. In that hour, 19.1% of the country’s demand was supplied by renewable generation. This was disclosed by Eskom in its recent quarterly system status and outlook briefing. In a separate dashboard, it says the contribution on that Monday in that hour was 4 784.7MW.

This means supply in that hour was about 25 000MW, compared with the current range of around 27 000MW and 28 000MW (based on the last few weeks – prior to the recent load shedding). Last Monday, for example, Eskom supplied around 27 500MW from its fleet and independent power producers in the 13:00 hour. It is notable that November 1 was between two separate bursts of load shedding, the first until October 29 (Friday), and from November 2).

This peak contribution figure is remarkable, given that only 5 901MW of renewable projects are installed and available at this point.

This equates to a load factor of 81%. While not strictly comparable, the overall energy availability factor for the utility is forecast to be 63% in the year to end-March (for its coal fleet, the number is around 50%).

The contribution from solar (photovoltaic) plants alone peaked towards the end of October at 2 100MW (12:00 on October 24), while wind alone peaked at 2 639MW on December 15 at 17:00. Solar generation tends to peak at around lunchtime (12:00/13:00), while wind generation typically peaks towards sunset (somewhere between 17:00 and 19:00). This makes wind a useful contributor to generation during the evening peak (19:00 in summer), especially in summer months which are windier.

Over the last five months (September to January), the average load factor for the country’s wind plants during the evening peak was 49%.

By contrast, between April and the end of July, this figure averaged 34%. Still, the 49% contribution equates to an average of 1 550MW from wind during the evening peak (from the total installed capacity of 3 163MW).

There is also some contribution during the peak from concentrated solar power (CSP) which, by design, has some sort of storage capacity (thermal, molten salt or other). This allows CSP plants to provide power after sunset, but the storage period is limited to up to six hours. Total installed capacity for CSP is modest, however, at only 500MW.

Critics will rightfully point to the fact that while solar plants can contribute as much as 2 000MW at lunchtime, their effectiveness fades into the afternoon. There are also questions about the usefulness of solar when it is overcast or raining in the western half of the country. Last Monday, for instance, solar contributed just 800MW at midday compared with more than double that (1 900MW) on Friday at midday.

Eskom says a further challenge is the “variability of renewable generation over a 24-hour period” which “requires conventional generation to be reduced or dispatched to compensate for the change in renewable generation output”. So far, the largest variation in renewable contribution from one evening peak to the next was 1 744MW (between August 7 and 8 last year). This, it says, equates to three large coal fired generators.

The controversial “risk mitigation” independent power producer procurement process attempts to address this by requiring bidders to be able to dispatch electricity from their projects when required. In other words, these projects cannot be simple solar or wind ones – if these technologies are used, there has to be a storage element. But this programme has stalled, following court challenges. The deadline for projects reaching financial close continues to be extended. At the end of January, it extended this for a third time (to the end of March).

Read: Eskom, DMRE’s new battery storage welcome, ‘but not enough’ 

The base load and evening peak challenges are not going away.

Natural gas and battery storage projects are key to solving both of these, especially as Eskom begins decommissioning coal generation. The current target, according to the most recent integrated resource plan (2019), is for 10 500MW of coal assets to be decommissioned by 2030. The utility sees as many as 10 entire power stations decommissioned. Four are slated for decommissioning in the short term: Komati, Camden, Grootvlei and Hendrina.

The last coal unit at Komati will be shut down in October. Eskom sees Komati as its flagship greening project. The pilot will see a 200MW solar plant erected on the site, to be supported by 244MW of battery storage. It is also investigating options to repower parts of the plant with gas.

The utility plans to access as much of the R131 billion pledged by developed nations at COP26 for the country’s just energy transition “as it can”. On Thursday, chief executive Andre De Ruyter hinted at imminent announcements, saying that he expected we will “shortly be seeing good news” about the country’s response to [the] “COP26 money”.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


“ Eskom says a further challenge is the “variability of renewable generation over a 24-hour period” which “requires conventional generation to be reduced or dispatched to compensate for the change in renewable generation output”

1. The variability in availability of the coal fleet is even more, since at most times around 12GW of the coal fleet is in unplanned unavailability (PR speak for broken). Coal intermittency dwarfs renewable intermittency.
2. The variability in energy demand by hour of day far exceeds (normal demand variance is about 6,000MW) the variability of renewable supply. If Eskom had an entirely coal or nuclear fleet it would still have to deal with that bumpy demand.

Eskom seems desperate to create a link between renewables and diesel peakers. that is complete nonsense. The pumped storage works as well with a coal electron as a renewable one and that pumped storage system is the part of the puzzle that is supposed to help with both bumps in demand and drops in supply.

As a whole again a good effort of the MW Team to come up with an original article on SA’s energy situation. But the article again mentions this concept of baseload power, which has become redundant in the modern way of thinking about energy grids, relying ever more on the more variable, but far cheaper and cleaner renewables. I mentioned in my comments earlier a good article by Wikus Kruger on DM a few months back, in which he completely debunks the myth of baseload.
Energy expert Grove Steyn in a tweet recently defines somebody who still uses this term as energy ignorant.

End of comments.




Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: