You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

SA nuclear procurement kicks off – NOT!

Eskom issues watered-down Request for Information.

Eskom on Tuesday afternoon released the Request for Information (RFI) for 9 600MW of new nuclear power generation capacity, but made it very clear that it has not commenced with procurement.

This follows after it failed to meet the deadlines for releasing the bid documents several times this year amid concern about the affordibility of nuclear for the country.

Government recently appointed Eskom and the South African Nuclear Energy Corporation (Necsa) as joint procurement agents. Eskom acting CEO Matshela Koko announced in November that the bid documents would be released before the end of the year and Eskom last week confirmed they would be released on December 15.

Shortly before that date it became clear that the 1 000-odd page document would be watered down and the full RFP would only be released at a later date. This was apparently done to ensure compliance with National Treasury’s procurement requirements. 

Nothing was however released on December 15 as the Minister of Public Enterprises Lynne Brown who is the representative of government as sole shareholder in Eskom requested a personal briefing.

On Tuesday afternoon Koko tweeted:

Shortly before 20:00 on Tuesday night Eskom issued a statement saying it has briefed Brown and issued the RFI.

Eskom describes the RFI as a stand-alone information-gathering exercise that “seeks to gather information including experience related to recent nuclear project capacities and costs, proposed financing solutions and localisation opportunities”.

It emphasises that the RFI process “will not create any financial commitments or obligations” on Eskom or the South African government. Eskom says the information obtained through the RFI process “will be used by Eskom and Necsa to finalise its submission to the departments including Public Enterprises, Energy and National Treasury and Cabinet to satisfy all relevant and applicable legislative and governance requirements for the potential nuclear new build programme, only after such approvals have been obtained can financial commitments be created”.

The sixteen-page RFI document also spells out that it is not part of a competitive tender and the information provided by vendors would not represent any commercial commitment.

It provides a timetable, which requires vendors to indicate by January 31 2017 their intention to submit a response, to submit queries for clarification by April 17 and submit their RFI responses by April 28.

While the RFI is silent on the actual procurement process, Necsa in a statement said the RFI “will be followed by two rounds of RFP (Request For Proposal) during which time the proposals as to the exact layout and format of the new nuclear power plants will be refined”. 

The RFI document sets out the principles in the Nuclear Energy Policy that underpin the new build programme. This includes that the programme should contribute to economic growth and technological development, should be only for peaceful purposes and comply with international obligations in this regard, skills and technology transfer, that a fleet approach would be followed and that the country would implement or get an interest in the complete nuclear fuel cycle.

It confirms that South Africa wants pressurised water reactors (PWR) and requires a long-term partnership with the successful vendor with regard to power generation and the replacement of Safari 1, the current research reactor operated by Necsa at its Pelindaba site near Pretoria.

According to the document the nuclear new build programme would include, but is not limited to:


It calls on vendors to submit information regarding their experience in existing domestic and export PWR nuclear power plant projects, including cost and price adjustments and construction schedule, lessons and savings as construction of several units on one site progresses, advantages of multiple units on one site and the impact of time spacing of the construction of multiple units.

The document does call for information regarding costs and funding.



Vendors are further required to provide information about their localisation model and contracting approach, their experience on establishing nuclear fuel fabrication and fuel cycle participation by client countries as well as their experience in localisation with regard to the Commercial Production Reactor.

Necsa chairman Dr Kelvin Kemm expressed his excitement that the nuclear RFI had been formally issued.

He said:  “Over forty years ago, in collaboration with foreign partners, South African embarked on the construction of Koeberg nuclear power station.  That decision turned out to be a great success.  This time around we can do even better.” 

Necsa CEO Phumzile Tshelane said: “The basic idea of the ‘fleet approach’ for the 9 600 MW of power is that as one reactor is being built, that the acquired technology skills are then seamlessly moved over to the next reactor.  In this way we not only establish new technology foundations, but we also keep costs down by using a production line system.”

Russian state nuclear energy corporation Rosatom that is regarded as a front runner to eventually win the contract issued a short statement saying it “welcomes the release of the Request for Information (RFI) and remains an interested bidder”.




Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Don’t know that Putin has been to Africa – this is his chance!

oh dear Eskom,pray tell who & how is this white nuclear-elephant going to be paid for?RE can be built for a fraction of the price of nuclear and in record time.Oh,and by the way,the grid can be made RE-friendly.

I can’t see what a briefing to Lynne Brown (or Tina Joumat-Petterson for that matter) would achieve. Neither knows anything about nuclear energy. It is a highly complex subject requiring years of training. But here we go again, politicizing so that J783 is assured of his cut. Problem for him is that he will be well and truly pushing up the daisies by the time that any payments take place.

Suggestion to keep it simple for Ms Brown: Reduce the RFI to two simple questions:
1. Can you build us one or more nuclear power stations?
2. If so, when?

While Eskom is working out how to put us in debt to the Russians for ever, the local renewables industry is being starved out by contracts not being signed.

The problem is that we no longer can trust anything that the ANC does. It seems that all their actions have a hidden agenda servicing them and not us nor the country.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: