You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Social partners grapple with the future of Nedlac

Council held its 24th Summit under the theme ‘Creating jobs together, preparing for the future of work and the fourth industrial revolution’.
President Cyril Ramaphosa (left) and Sipho Pityana (right). There have been calls for a new agenda for Nedlac. Image: Siyabulela Duda

If the National Economic Development and Labour Council (Nedlac) is to play a role in getting South Africa out of its economic malaise, it will have to undergo a reconfiguration, a radical repositioning, and be better resourced.

The clearinghouse between business, labour, government and community organisations was established through an act of parliament in 1994 during the dying days of apartheid, with the aim of creating broad-ranging social compacts to drive economic development.

It has had some success, like the National Minimum Wage Bill that was implemented at the start of the year. Even so, there is a realisation that its best days might be behind it.

This was in a way acknowledged at is its annual summit on Wednesday when Business Unity SA (Busa) challenged the leadership of the forum to “introspect” on how it can position itself to deal with the economic challenges of the day. 

Fit for purpose? 

“The time has come for a new agenda for sustainable change for the state of our nation and consequently, as Nedlac, we must ask if we are able to be catalysts for that change,” business representative Sipho Pityana told delegates. 

About 25 years down the line, said Pityana, the forum cannot afford to “rest on its laurels” as the challenges of insignificant job creation and jobless growth remain, and the increasingly automating and digitising nature of work is displacing thousands of unskilled and underskilled workers.

Pityana said the forum, which is considered the apex social dialogue structure in the country, must ask itself if it is fit for purpose or whether it should be “relegated to the scrapyard of history”.

New agenda

Job creation is one of the most pressing issues of the present day with various companies announcing retrenchments as economic activity fails to pick up; unemployment has climbed up to just under 30% with no sign of slowing down.  

Pityana said the various social partners had to create an agenda that looks beyond legislation and sets its sights on preserving and creating meaningful and safe jobs.

“The urgency of the times suggests that Nedlac is well-suited to lead the charge in navigating us into a set of compacts around a range of issues, it may be Eskom, or restructuring other state entities or agreeing to partner with the private sector,” he said. 

He asked if Nedlac should not play a greater role in drawing up a blueprint on what the country needs to do in order to avoid a ratings downgrade from Moody’s especially when this could have a negative impact on jobs. 

He went on to ask if the forum should not “open-mindedly” engage with National Treasury’s discussion document which proposes a series of reforms to drive inclusive economic growth and employment. 

Trade union federation Cosatu outrightly rejected the paper, which proposes the partial privatisation of Eskom and an exemption of small and medium enterprises from paying the minimum wage, among other things. 

All a dream

Labour representative Bheki Ntshalintshali was unmoved by Pityana’s speech, saying that while labour started the year on a high note, following the presidential jobs summit and the implementation of the national minimum wage and other labour agreements, nine months down the line he says labour can only confirm that “it was just a dream”. 

Ntshalinsthali said labour had started to question its commitment to social dialogue which it understands as needing to be transparent, committed and built on trust where differences are dealt with openly. 

“How then do we explain to our members that there was a commitment to job creation and decent work [at the jobs summit] but instead we hear of retrenchments almost every day,” he asked. 

He further asked how unions are meant to explain to workers that although the national minimum wage had come into effect on January 1, nine months later there are those in government who hold a different view.

“This makes us very uncomfortable to come to this meeting because we don’t know the value of our engagement and the agreements that we have and if they will be implemented,” he said. 

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Minimum wages are destroying and curtailing many jobs.

If SA want to continue on the socialist / communist path forget about jobs.

Is it not clear to the people involved here that their continues “struggle” is the cause of their misfortune?

The rest of the world has had enough of SA’s self inflicted “struggle”. They have had enough “struggle” tourism. They have had enough of “struggle” investments. They have had enough of “struggle” toi-toi’s. They have had enough of “struggle” labour unions. They have had enough of “struggle” corruption. They have had enough of “struggle” service delivery. They have had enough of “struggle” bailouts.

No need to continue.

The rest of the world and half of SA is just sick and tired of the “struggle” and the inability of questionable leadership to face reality.

You can not have a capitalist outcome to a socialist problem.

Nedlac’s only so-called success, the minimum wage, is the driver of the record levels of unemployment and is a disservice to the poorest members of society. This is an excellent example of how the manipulation of the free market through socialist actions creates disadvantages for those who are supposed to benefit.

This is the situation that plays out all over the country at this very moment: We have a board meeting of the frail care facility this morning. A charitable organisation manages this facility that cares for 100 previously disadvantaged individuals from the community. The rise in the minimum wage created a shortfall of R1 million in the cashflow. We have two options. We can fire 20 workers to try and break even, or we can stop providing services to the poor, frail, exposed, destitute and elderly members of society.

Who benefitted from this minimum wage? The workers did not benefit because they will lose their jobs either way. The elderly members of society did not benefit because they will be out on the street. The charitable organization did not benefit because the members are disheartened and negative. The community gained nothing either. Only the members of Nedlac gained recognition for a week or so, while the new minimum wage was all over the press. Only wealthy politicians gained something and whatever they gained was taken away from the poorest and most exposed members of society.

This is socialism in action and it explains the mechanism by which myopic socialist actions create instability in small communities.

Twenty five years of this and you are still trying to figure out how to create jobs? Twenty five years and we have reached record levels of unemployment for the country. Well done guys. All you have succeeded in doing is to create and entrench a new class of elites. At this rate we will be on the brink of the 5th industrial revolution before even starting the 4th. Glad I will no longer be around to witness that catastrophe.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: