Proudly sponsored by

South Africa torn over multibillion cost of fighting inequality

The number of SA’s welfare recipients has grown sixfold since 1998.
President Cyril Ramaphosa. Image: Waldo Swiegers/Bloomberg

Politics and economics are set to collide over welfare payments in the world’s most unequal nation.

The first clue over which will prevail may come in South African President Cyril Ramaphosa’s state-of-the-nation address on Thursday.

Cyril Ramaphosa, South Africa’s president, speaks to the media outside parliament in Cape Town, South Africa, on Thursday, Nov. 11, 2021. South Africa’s Treasury vowed to return state finances to a sustainable path, holding off expanding welfare measures in one of the world’s most unequal societies. Government bonds and the rand gained.

Record unemployment and deepening poverty has fuelled calls for the government to move toward a basic income grant, which would be the biggest of its kind globally, or to at least extend a temporary stipend of R350 a month paid to the unemployed during the pandemic permanent at that level or slightly higher. That measure added 10.3 million people to the welfare net.

Read: Ramaphosa advisors divided over implementing basic income grant

The debate has pitted Ramaphosa, who has said a basic income grant is a possibility and has raised the idea several times, against Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, who’s seeking to return government finances — hard hit by a decade of overspending, mismanagement and corruption — to a sustainable path.

For Ramaphosa expanding what’s already a large welfare state is attractive because it could bolster support for the ruling party after its share of the vote sank below 50% for the first time in last year’s municipal elections. For Godongwana it’s unpalatable and he has said the money would be better spent on creating jobs and investing in water, power and other infrastructure.

“Ramaphosa is staking his political future on the permanence of this grant,” Michael Sachs, former head of the National Treasury’s budget office and head of a commission that makes recommendations to government on financial and fiscal matters, said in an interview.

The argument for additional support for the poor is strong. More than a third of the workforce is jobless. A week of looting and arson that killed 354 people across two provinces in July has been attributed to increasing desperation.

Yet South Africa already spends 3.3% of gross domestic product on welfare, mostly in the form of child support and pensions. That’s more than most countries and will amount to 222 billion rand in the year through February. Before the Covid-19 stipend more than 18 million people, or almost a third of the population, were on welfare.

Even Ramaphosa’s own economic advisers are divided. Eleven members of the Presidential Economic Advisory Council put their names to a leaked report that said a basic income grant would be a “policy error” that would crowd out spending on health, education and infrastructure. The taxes that would be needed to pay for it would stunt growth, they said.

Divided advisers

“We can’t afford continuous additions to the welfare net in our country,” said Cas Coovadia, chief executive officer of Business Unity South Africa, the country’s biggest business organisation. “Our economy is not growing and is rated as sub-investment grade.”

Four members of the council wrote a dissenting report that argued for such a grant.

Not paying one “is basically a threat to our social fabric and we might see another July moment if we do not act decisively now,” Zimbali Mncube, a researcher at the Institute for Economic Justice, said in reference to last year’s violence.

Sachs, and other economists, predict Ramaphosa will extend the support to the unemployed, and that could be seen a precursor to more generous support at a later stage. The 350-rand payment is set at just a quarter of the monthly income the national statistics agency says is needed to escape poverty.

Extending the Covid-19 stipend alone for a year would cost 35 billion rand, according to BNP Paribas. While the government can probably afford to do so as high commodity prices are putting revenue on course to exceed estimates, a permanent basic income grant could prove unsustainable.

In November, Godongwana pledged to address the deterioration in state finances, regain South Africa’s investment-grade credit ratings and said funding for grants beyond March would depend on revenue. He’s due to announce updated spending plans in the Feb. 23 budget.

What Bloomberg economics says…

“Should South Africa extend the Covid-19 grant by another year? Yes, the pandemic is far from over. Should we make it permanent? Yes, if the goal is poverty reduction, but this comes at a cost that requires additional fiscal and policy trade-offs. The government’s track record on the latter calls for caution.” — Boingotlo Gasealahwe, Africa Economist

Unemployed youth interviewed in townships north of Pretoria, the capital, said even the 350-rand payment helped them pay for transport to seek work, bolstering the argument that the payments could ultimately boost employment.

Merely extending the monthly stipend in its current form won’t be enough, said Colin Coleman, co-chairman of South Africa’s Youth Employment Service and former head of Goldman Sachs in sub-Saharan Africa. To have an impact it should be more than doubled and at the same time economic reforms should be pushed through, he said

“This is not just about social consumption,” he said. “It’s good for the poor, it’s good for the unemployed; it’s going to save lives and prevent hunger and it’s going to be massive for stimulating investment, jobs and growth.”

© 2022 Bloomberg


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Incentivizing people to do nothing and to procreate for money must be the purest form of idiocy from any government on the planet !!!

We agree that people are not the same. Some are blessed with the ability to become a CA, a neurosurgeon, or a nuclear physicist, while others are blessed with the ability to dig trenches to install fiber networks or to perform hand labor in factories. The differences in material position merely follow the differences in mental and physical capability. There will be large inequality in a free society. The degree of inequality in a particular society is merely a product of the difference in the cognitive ability of the members of that society.

It won’t solve inequality when a socialist government punishes people of high cognitive ability and superior work ethics with a tax, in order to reward lazy people with the victim mentality. This act merely distorts the actual measure of inequality and does nothing to address the cause of inequality.

A socialist government will use social engineering to treat people differently in order to make them equal. There cannot be equality before the law in any country if people from diverse cultural backgrounds are materially equal. This can only be acquired by coercive means by a central planning authority in an oppressive state.

End of comments.




Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: