South Africa’s fiscal squeeze

Warning signs ignored for too long.
Image: Getty images

An analysis of South Africa’s current economic crisis which has put the country on the path of fiscal unsustainability was recently published by renowned economics professor Ricardo Hausmann and a number of co-researchers.

The paper shows clearly that South Africa embarked on an unsustainable fiscal trajectory over the last decade. Specific attention is drawn to the fiscal pressures coming from unsustainable growth in civil service remuneration and social grant expenditure over the period under review.

At the same time, economic growth in South Africa underperformed. Over the past decade, the trend in actual economic growth declined. In addition the country’s full potential economic growth rate also declined from around 2,5% per annum to around 1,5%.

South Africa clearly faces a serious fiscal dilemma and hard choices. The relevant question is: Who should have listened and who should have cared in the period running up to the current fiscal crisis?

The answer, as we set out below, encompasses many culprits. This includes trade unions who demanded too large civil service remuneration increases and those in the executive who granted these increases. The National Treasury is also on the list. It repeatedly overestimated annual economic growth and tax revenue. And so is parliament: its structures failed in their oversight role.

The culprits

The impact of extensive growth in civil service remuneration and social grant expenditure on the country’s fiscal sustainability was hidden for many years in unrealistically high annual growth projections used by the National Treasury in the annual budget documentation.

This is evident from a review of budget documentation of successive years published by the National Treasury.

Both of us are part of the Fiscal Cliff Study Group, an informal group that has been assessing fiscal sustainability since 2013. We warned against this practice on numerous occasions, particularly in submissions to the Standing and Select Committees on Finance of Parliament.

These warnings were at first brushed off as being alarmist. But they were confirmed over time, as evident from various Budget Reviews.

Revenue and expenditure estimates were based on unrealistic projections, leading to a compounding error effect. Lower than estimated revenue figures became the norm. At the same time expenditure continued to grow unabated. This resulted in a widening of the deficit before borrowing and in government debt as a percentage of GDP. More realistic assumptions for government revenue budgets should have been adopted earlier, thus limiting systemic errors in budget assumptions.

Over the same period the number of social grant recipients increased. With the inclusion of the Covid-19 grants recipients, more than 30% of South Africans are direct beneficiaries of some form of social assistance.

We recognise the important role of grants for poverty alleviation. But it would be negligent to not, at the same time, highlight the heavy burden this places on the already overstretched fiscus, and on taxpayers. It leaves no room for further permanent increases in social grants.

A related problem is that grant payments crowd out investment spending by the government. The focus in fiscal planning shifted to the continued funding of consumption expenditure. Warnings about this development were also ignored.

The paper by Hausmann and his colleagues also highlights the impact of civil service remuneration increases above the rate of inflation on South Africa’s precarious fiscal position. The true nature and full impact of this problem was not disclosed for many years.

Despite limited information, concerns were also raised about the growth trends in civil service remuneration and in social grant expenditure, with a concomitant impact on government borrowing and the interest burden, as far back as May 2013. It was only after continued requests that an appendix detailing civil service remuneration trends has begun to be included annually in the government’s Medium Term Budget Policy Statement since 2017.

A major deficiency in South African fiscal policy is promises made by politicians and demands by civil society for more expenditure, that cannot be accommodated within the budget limitations facing the government. One current example is growing demands for a universal basic income grant.

These demands are made with seemingly little acknowledgement of the country’s precarious fiscal position.

Averting the inflation pitfall

Under conditions of fiscal unsustainability, many countries often also suffer high inflation. This danger should be averted in South Africa.

Containing inflation is the responsibility of the South African Reserve Bank in terms of a monetary policy framework anchored in inflation targeting. However, this responsibility has to be supported by sound fiscal policy. Containing inflation can become impossible under conditions of fiscal unsustainability.

Under conditions of high inflation, the real value of government debt is eroded, thus reducing (in real terms) the burden placed on government’s fiscal position. In such a situation the government is the only winner, albeit at the expense of the general population.

But the caveat here is that these are merely short term wins with long term detrimental economic effects far outweighing any short term gains.

Will someone be listening this time?The Conversation

Jannie Rossouw, Visiting Professor at the Business School, University of the Witwatersrand and Stephanus Johannes Joubert, Senior Lecturer in Economics , University of South Africa

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.



“The answer, as we set out below, encompasses many culprits. This includes trade unions who demanded too large civil service remuneration increases and those in the executive who granted these increases. The National Treasury is also on the list. It repeatedly overestimated annual economic growth and tax revenue. And so is parliament: its structures failed in their oversight role.”

And the solution to the vast mass of unproductive people living off the backs of the minority of productive taxpayers? There is no silver bullet; it has been stolen and the masses do not want to or cannot comprehend that these taxpayers can only contribute until their finances too, implode.

“Will someone be listening this time?” They may listen but sadly they do not have the capacity to formulate, action and produce a working economy.

Yet they will not acknowledge this fact because the embarrassment is just too much to bear and to go cap in hand to the business community who built this country is inconceivable.

Book of Proverbs, 16:18, “Pride goeth before destruction, and a haughty spirit before a fall.”

Economics starts with scarcity. It is about the efficient and fair allocation of scarce resources. It is about competition and the most efficient satisfaction of consumer needs. It is about production and the mutually beneficial exchange between strangers.

Anti-economics, or socialism, starts with abundance and works backward. The socialist philosophy assumes that resources are abundand, which they are not. Therefore, it emphasizes redistribution and ignores production. All the projects and structures are directed towards the process of redistribution and not a single structure focuses on the production process. If left to its own devices for long enough it will deplete the scarce resources and destroy all the production processes through neglect and plunder.

Nothing causes poverty. It is the original or default state, the starting point for all societies. We have to ask ourselves, What causes prosperity?

Economics is about prosperity and socialism is about poverty. The ANC elite has been implementing an antieconomic policy for almost 3 decades now and in this process, they have distributed poverty equally among the masses and wealth unequally among themselves.

End of comments.




Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: