Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

South Africa’s informal sector creates jobs, but shouldn’t be romanticised

Working hours in the informal sector are long, and earnings often low.

The publication of South Africa’s latest unemployment figures was accompanied by the usual wringing of hands and promises of job creation. This time, however, a new controversy arose because of an argument that official statistics don’t count economic activities in the informal sector.

The claim that official employment data underestimates the informal sector is largely based on the premise that many people who undertake activities in the informal sector are mistakenly counted as unemployed.

Statistics South Africa has two surveys which measure informal sector employment. The Quarterly Labour Force Surveys (QLFS) provide the official unemployment numbers. They also count informal sector activities using an internationally comparable definition endorsed by the International Labour Organisation.

In addition, every four years the Survey of Employers and the Self-Employed interviews owners or operators of small businesses which are not registered for value added tax identified in the QLFS.

What do these surveys show? The latest QLFS found about 3 million people were working in the informal sector. This is just under 20% of total employment.

Critics of official data argue that a wide range of informal sector activities are not visible. Analysis of QLFS data by activity suggests otherwise. By way of example, analysis of QLFS data finds 92 600 mechanics, 71 800 construction labourers, 52 100 traditional medicine practitioners, 35 700 electricians and plumbers and 26 500 tavern and shebeen operators, among many other activities.

In short, official statistics suggest that the informal sector accounts for a large share of total employment. There seems to be little sense in quibbling about the numbers without compelling evidence to suggest that they are way off.

A shadow economy?

Some characterise the informal sector as the “shadow economy”. They also bemoan the lack of taxes paid by informal sector operators. These criticisms are one such outcome of misrepresenting the size and shape of the informal sector. The vast majority of informal operators (73%) earn well below the income tax threshold of R79 000 per annum (about $5 372) set by the South African Revenue Service. For example, the hourly earnings of the typical own-account worker in the informal sector are R18 ($1.20) for men and R13 ($0.88) for women.

In addition many informal sector workers – and particularly those in retail – pay VAT on their purchases. But unlike their counterparts in the formal sector they are not able to claim these amounts back from the tax authorities.

This is not to deny that some informal sector businesses are more successful and have the potential to create employment. The Survey of Employed and the Self-employed data suggests that these operators are largely men and working in transport and construction. It is also true that incentivising them to register and pay taxes would benefit the economy. However, the data suggest that this intervention would not be appropriate for the vast majority of own account operators in the informal sector.

We would argue that the informal sector is worth supporting because it is a large part of the workforce. Further, while earnings are often very low in the informal sector, this type of employment is particularly important in keeping households above the poverty line.

But what kind of support should be given to the sector?

Do no harm

The critical first step is “do no harm” measures. Regulations, like municipal by-laws that often criminalise work in the informal sector, need to be reviewed.

If we are serious about supporting the informal sector, we should not assume that it will expand and grow on its own amidst contradictory, opaque and even hostile regulations and practices.

A key driver in punitive approaches is an attempt to regulate the activities of foreign migrants. Research on foreign migrants in the informal sector shows that, contrary to popular claims, they are in the minority. It outlines multiple contributions by immigrants to employment, rent, food security and the tax base.

The need for a conducive environment for informal sector activity applies to South Africans and immigrants alike, and the blunt instrument of harsh regulation damages livelihoods and denies consumers access to the goods and services informal operators provide.

Recent actions to tackle counterfeiting in inner-city Johannesburg have gone way beyond this claimed intention, and prejudiced many traders not involved in selling counterfeits. These actions have effectively destroyed a hub of cross border trade, with annual turnovers twice that of Sandton City, South Africa’s upmarket shopping centre.

In the face of state failure, immigrants are easy scapegoats. Targeted closures of immigrant businesses are not only a violation of immigrants’ rights – but also fundamentally damages the economy.

Support measures

In addition to the frequent emphasis on access to financial services and training, research on the informal sector demonstrates that investing in the relevant infrastructure has an important and positive impact on the resilience and productivity of informal workers.

Those working in public spaces need access to basic infrastructure such as water and toilet facilities. They also need access to infrastructure to support their work: shelter, storage and sorting facilities.

Homes are the workplace of many informal workers. But too little attention is paid to this in approaches to the upgrading of informal settlements and low-cost housing developments.

And for women working in the informal sector, care responsibilities affect productivity and the ability to earn reliable income and accumulate assets. Far greater attention needs to be paid to affordable and accessible child care and assistance with other care responsibilities.

The informal and formal economies are interlinked in multiple ways. Detailed analyses of value chains could inform more sophisticated policy interventions.

That said, it is important not to romanticise working in the informal sector. Our research has shown that working conditions are often difficult with few protections against shocks. This points to the importance of tackling decent work and social protection deficits in the informal sector.

Putting aside the controversy around the numbers, it is worth supporting those working in the informal sector. However constructing a narrative that suggests a massive shadow economy not captured by the statistics is not helpful in tailoring policies which address the realities.The Conversation

Mike Rogan, associate professor, Rhodes University and Caroline Skinner, senior researcher at the African Centre for Cities, University of Cape Town.

This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


To comment, you must be registered and logged in.


Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

Sure….but we romanticise our unemployed and grant recipients instead.

Really? Who romanticises them?

The government does. At the slightest hint that grants may not be paid or paid late, the govt goes into panic mode.

When it comes to paying small business contractors on time…hey, no problem with that at all.

The unemployed and co are “our people” but industry which powers the economy and pays the taxes….not so much.

So yes, I think they are romanticised

The combination of Labour unions and labour laws create a monopoly on the job market. The minimum wage is a further, higher hurdle into the job market. This combination creates a false, unfair advantage for the relatively small number of unionised workers and the politicians who depend on their votes, while it puts the rest of the workforce and all the consumers at a distinct disadvantage. This combination of militant unions that are empowered by the state and the minimum wage that is a bribe for votes, creates the largest unemployment figures in the world.

The Tripartite Alliance forces people out of the formal jobs market, into the informal sector where there is no minimum wage, no workers rights, no strikes and no BEE requirements. In short, these socialist ANC policies develop and support the construction mafia, the zamma-zamma industry and the looting by BEE companies while it destroys the formal economy and job opportunities.

Labour laws force consumers to pay for overpriced labour. The law itself is a barrier-to-entry into the jobs market. The law takes away the basic human right to sell your labour at a price determined by yourself.

The Tripartite Alliance is a coercive structure that steals from the general public to enrich the members of the Alliance. In effect, the Tripartite Alliance exports employment opportunities, taxable income, economic growth and social stability to the rest of the world, while it imports unemployment, a declining tax base, a shrinking economy and social unrest from the rest of the world. Why do they enter into this destructive trade of sabotage? For votes of course. The profit of this trade is counted in votes, while the cost of this trade is counted in lives.

Travelling America at this moment. A country where hiring and firing can in the main be done freely. Everywhere people are hiring, students are offered payments on their loans for working at McDonalds, for instance. Nashville is pumping and the entrepeneurs innovating. Everybody- and of course few are first nation, rest immigrated however long ago, proud of being American and sure of their status. Sick of thieves trying to divide the cake vs growing it, of being told I don’t belong in the land of my birth, of having to watch out not to be murdered.


Had a similar experience when I visited the US for the first time earlier this year. A different planet when it comes to earning power, labour and the free market.

America is truly built on the backs of immigrants, even Trump and his wife are / were originally.

Guess just like my families left their country of birth to came to South Africa many years ago, it might just be my time to leave my country of birth for a new country. After all, human migration is as old as humans themselves, so I’m thinking it might just be time to migrate like my forefathers once did to a country that treats you better.

Well-written, thoughtful article providing wise insight and background to an issue that otherwise provides the ONLY available necessary social relief and dignity in very trying personal circumstances.

“Targeted closures of immigrant businesses are not only a violation of immigrants’ rights”

So I get on a plane, don’t apply for residency, and go and open a business in the UK. I’m breaking the UK’s laws. Are the authors going to use the same pathetic argument above? Furthermore, if they’re benefiting SA’s economy, how come they’re not doing the same for their home economy?

But I think you could expect the authorities to move in and take whatever action against you rather than the mob who loot your business, destroy it and the pour petrol over you an set you alight.

Informal sector jobs in SA are not jubs but survival urban subistance initiatives. A job is where you get a salary and you get out of survival mode.

Informal. A machine used to propel today wealthy. With as outstanding success, trade and union leaders, worldwide. The used name, international, is working class. Same thing. Some are employed, others not. Tools for success is blaming others. Watch election time. Anyplace on this planet. Standing out result is the hope, informal, do not get it. With guaranty results. History have names for the few times it failed. French revolution as most outstanding.

Non-taxpayers (i.e. informal sector workers), unproductive citizens (e.g. social grant recipients) and thugs (e.g. taxi industry) treated like royalty while ordinary, law-abiding and tax-paying citizens treated like dirt. If ever there was an unsustainable system this is it.

A point missed on the recent zenofobia, is that it is probably instituted and blown up by the former intelligence spooks of Zuma. The State Capturers are trying to make CR look bad, so that he can be recalled and then they can continue their looting. Committing treason, they are.

Load All 13 Comments
End of comments.


Insider GOLD
ONLY R63pm

Moneyweb's premium subscription is a membership service which will give you access to a number of tools to take charge of your investments.
Choose a yearly subscription at R630pa - SAVE R126

Get instant access to all our tools and content. Monthly subscription can be cancelled at any time.



Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: