You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Survé’s debt-for-shares plan to clear Independent Media’s PIC debt

Proposal made after the newspaper group was unable to make repayments on its close to R1bn loan.
The exact details of the debt-clearing agreement remain unclear, but former PIC CEO Dan Matjila says it was contingent upon the successful listing of Sagarmatha Technologies, which never happened. Image: Dean Hutton/Bloomberg

Iqbal Survé’s Sekunjalo Investment Holdings wanted the Public Investment Corporation (PIC) to swop the close to R1 billion debt and equity claims in its print media subsidiary Independent Media for a stake in a company that didn’t exist and at a share price that would be determined by them.

The offer from Sekunjalo was discussed by the unlisted investment team of the PIC in October 2017 after Independent had not been unable to meet its loan repayments “due to a tough operating environment”. 

The PIC helped Sekunjalo to purchase Independent by issuing it with a loan of R1.3 billion, which included equity of 25% in the newspaper company. Independent immediately paid the PIC R397 million, leaving it with total exposure of R888 million. 

The PIC commission of inquiry looking at issues of impropriety at the institution and lapses in its investment processes took a turn in testy waters with a focus on the transactions the PIC has concluded with companies under the Sekunjalo banner that have been in the spotlight over the years. 

The PIC manages over R2 trillion in assets largely belonging to the Government Employees Pension Fund (GEPF) and other state entities. 

To invest or not to invest?

At the time the investment in Independent was considered, neither the PIC board nor the GEPF supported the transaction.

Former PIC CEO Dan Matjila told commissioners the GEPF was concerned that Independent was in a sector with a “bleak future” and the PIC board asked the PIC to invest at a lower price and find another investor to share the risk.

“The asset has performed poorly in terms of financial returns,” said Matjila, likening it to other print media companies.

Asked by commission assistant Gill Marcus why the PIC would decide to invest in the company given the apprehension of the board and the GEPF, Matjila was careful to outline that the transaction was sent to committees and finally approved by the board.

He said the PIC made the investment based on the value proposition placed before them at the time – Independent had a comprehensive digital strategy to mitigate the dwindling market share that print media was grappling with.

“The board agreed with that [and] despite reservations they approved it on that basis,” Matjila said.

He added that the nature of investments was a “guessing game” and the coin can fall on either side.

Debt and share swop arrangement  

Matjila said Sekunjalo approached the PIC as early as September 2017 to try and restructure the loans and claims that were due and payable to the PIC after it had struggled to meet payments.

In its initial proposal considered in October 2017 Sekunjalo wanted to “acquire all the shares and loan claims that the PIC has in Sekunjalo in exchange for shares in a new company to be listed named [Sagarmatha Technologies]”.

This is how the PIC would exit from Independent.

In its offer Sekunjalo was willing to double the amount the PIC had paid for direct equity in Independent, while on the loans it would pay back amounts that were slightly higher than those payable, amounting to R1.55 billion.

Read: Survé eyes foreign listings for Sagarmatha

These ‘higher amounts’ would be converted into shares – at a listing price that was yet to be published – when Sagarmatha issued its pre-listing statement.

In previous testimony, PIC listed equities general manager Lebogang Molebatsi, who was part of the team that worked on the Sagarmatha transaction, outlined how the company had been overvalued. The company wanted to raise R3 billion through its initial public offering, with an asking price of R39.62 per share. 

He said the team had priced it at R7.06 but received a lot of pushback from the company.

PIC counter-offer

The PIC put a counter-offer on the table, opting only to convert its equity in Independent to a stake in Sagarmatha but stating that all loans be settled in cash at their amortised value as at October 30, 2017. The listed investment team would also carry out its own assessment to establish its appetite for investing in Sagarmatha.

“The PIC counter-offer allowed for the PIC to fully exit the loans and preference shares with a return of about 13%,” said Matjila.

From Matjila’s statement it is not clear what happened to this counter-offer or whether it was ever considered by Sekunjalo because when the PIC’s unlisted investment team presented the offer to the investment panel, it mentioned that “there will be no cash pay-out but the issuance of shares”. This meeting took place in December 2017.

Read: JSE explains Ayo and scuppered Sagarmatha listing

The panel approved the Sekunjalo offer presented by the team on the condition that the exit was not dependant on Sargamatha’s listing and that the deal received all the requisite board and shareholder approvals.

Matjila said the agreement was signed by him on behalf of the PIC and finalised with Sekunjalo.

“One of the suspensive conditions to the agreement was the successful listing of Sagarmatha, which ultimately never happened,” said Matjila. Thus the agreement lapsed.

What exactly did the PIC agree to? 

A copy of a letter sent to Sekunjalo in January 2018 by the PIC’s private equity head Mervin Muller caused confusion between Matjila and evidence leader advocate Isaac Monnahela as they tried to determine the details of the agreement.

What was contested is a clause where Muller states that the offer was “separate from the offer to acquire a stake in Sagarmatha and the PIC’s acceptance to exit the investment in [Independent] and [Sekunjalo]”. Further, it should not be conditional upon the PIC’s participation in the company’s listing. 

The letter does not explicitly mention whether the shares would be paid for in cash or through a share swop but says Sekunjalo should give the PIC details on how it intends to fund the offer.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Doing business in the new SA (IF you are connected / chosen )

Start a co.
Borrow LARGE from PIC (friendly money shop on the corner)
Offer a bribe – if required.
Default on repayment.
Revalue shares upwards without any real underpinning values.
Debt for equite swop at 10000% increase in share value.
Sit back and dictate to others – – playing the R-card
Live as a very rich man!

Easy – BUT, you have to be chosen or connected to get this.

Throw in the word “transformation” and the deal is done regardless of how risky/stupid the deal is.

And Iqbal’s name is prominent – connected fellow.

This is what you call Black empowerment enriching the live of a well connected political and unionist elitist..Just ask for any amount of cash without a proper due diligence with a far fetched business plan,that hypothesis that will never the light of day,and you are empoered,with pensioner money.

How in this day and age DOES anyone with any sort of investment mind set invest in a dying industry,with no payback,and still want to further throw good money after bad money.The ex PIC Ceo need to be ashamed of of how recklessly ,his decision were.This is what happened to all our public institution,that are politically controlled,are just there to be ripped off and create a black Middle class by not creating wealth but by stealing from public purses.

“He said the team had priced it at R7.06 but received a lot of pushback from the company.” So who was doing the pushing? And could it have been a person/s with ANC political influence? Like the ex- president?

“…there will be no cash pay-out but the issuance of shares”. So everything just devolves into monopoly money being paid back while Survé gets to spend actual money on things like apartments in the V&A Waterfront?

When are these people going to jail?

Unfortunately our dear NPA is currently taken up with the real crimes of the past, such as the SARS rogue unit which stole (don’t quite recall how much, but it must have been untold billions) from taxpayers. Luckily the NPA is being ably assisted by our dear PP. They are after the real criminals. Once they are done with that they may get around to tackling the “State Capture” culprits, if they or the necessary evidence is still around. By then the lights will probably be off and we will be enjoying our “Venezuela” moment.

Vuvuzuela moment.

Ha ha yes stood out to me as well, what has the company’s opinion about its value have to do with your own internal valuation? Normally how these things should work in the real world is a company planning to list will come up with a value decided upon with their bankers. Company then goes on roadshow sees investors, investors make up their mind if the want to invest or not. If an investor’s valuation is lower than what the company values itself at, you simply do not invest, you do not adjust your valuation upwards!

Matjila’s business acumen leaves a lot to be desired.
Even worse, he does not seem to be able to understand that.
Or perhaps I am just naive and he is a really smart business person with the goal is to enrich himself?

” the nature of investments was a “guessing game” and the coin can fall on either side”.

Where do the SOEs find these people?

Talking about jumping from the fuel into the fire. Simply put, the debt of one company was transferred to another of which the value of said company was unknown (a guess). Jail time broer!

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: