Registered users can save articles to their personal articles list. Login here or sign up here

Time is running out for e-tolls, yet the summons blitz kicks into high gear

While the contractor issues 4 000 summonses a month, the legal woes continue.

The death of e-tolls has been predicted since they were launched in 2013, and yet they are still here. But it’s doubtful they can survive much longer, for four reasons:

  • It will become a major political issue in the 2019 elections
  • The Electronic Toll Collection (ETC) contract for the administration of e-tolls runs out in December 2019
  • The ANC wants to win the election
  • The threat of legal action against non-paying road users is not working.

ETC SA, which administers the e-tolls, is issuing 4 000 summonses a month to recover outstanding debts. Lawyers are certainly making money out of this, but no-one else.

E-tolls will become a major political issue ahead of the 2019 elections, as opposition parties have made it clear they intend to bludgeon the ANC for forcing through an ill-conceived and costly project without proper public consultation.

The ETC contract for the administration of e-tolls expires at the end of 2019. Sanral spokesperson Vusi Mona says the contract will be put out to tender before this time, but others believe political pressure will kill it outright. Among the alternatives being suggested is a 1c to 2c a litre fuel levy to finance a long-dated bond, which should allow Sanral to refinance its existing debt and get rid of the monthly administrative burden of collecting outstanding e-toll debts.

The government has given out mixed signals on the future of e-tolls, from which it is collecting just R60 million a month – a fraction of the amount predicted when the project launched in 2013. It is having to subsidise these to the tune of more than R400 million a year, while Gauteng freeways are increasingly congested and in need of further investment. That investment has been delayed because of the e-tolls boycott.

Recognising that e-tolls are a political liability, President Cyril Ramaphosa and Gauteng Premier David Makhura have voiced their concerns about their future, yet their words have been contradicted by others in the ANC.

Sanral’s recently released financial results for the year to March 2018 show it has billed road users R25.5 billion since 2014, of which nearly R15 billion has been impaired. This means it continues to behave as if the balance of R10.6 billion is still collectible, which is almost certainly an accounting fiction, bearing in mind that just R3.9 billion has been collected since the project launch. In terms of the Public Finance Management Act (PFMA), Sanral is not permitted to write off debts, even though in practical terms it will never recover this amount. In its annual report, Sanral acknowledges that any debt older than three years could be subject to prescription (ie. is non-collectible) in terms of the Prescription Act.

ETC has been issuing summonses to non-paying road users at the rate of 4 000 a month. ETC chief project officer Coenie Vermaak says the company is contractually obliged to recover outstanding monies from non-paying road users. “The summonses are seen as a last resort,” he says. “After an extensive engagement earlier this year, including some 13.5 million SMSs and letters of demand sent to road users, summonses are now being issued at a rate of around 4 000 per month.

“The legal process takes more time, but ETC did see an improvement in settlements, since the start of this campaign.”

E-toll revenue: actual versus budget

Source: Sanral (click to enlarge)

The Organisation Undoing Tax Abuse (Outa) reckons that just 30% of Gauteng road users are paying e-tolls, while overseas experience in similar projects suggests a 90% compliance rate is needed for financial viability.

Says Outa CEO Wayne Duvenage: “As far as we are concerned, the scheme has become defunct due to public resistance, all as a result of a poorly researched matter which resulted in a very unwise decision to proceed with this financing mechanism, whereby the scheme has become unmanageable and grossly inefficient. It makes no sense with the continuation thereof. And despite this development, government for some obscure reason has recently decided to continue with e-toll, after having said in March that an alternative solution is required. The provincial ANC structures in Gauteng have also made a decision that this scheme has no place in their province and must be scrapped.”

Manny de Freitas, shadow transport minister for the Democratic Alliance, says a 10c a litre addition to the fuel levy would have paid for the entire Gauteng Freeway Improvement Project (GFIP) by now, had it been implemented at the start. “Plus there would have been no administration costs and a 100% compliance rate.

“E-tolls have to go. There is no question of this,” he adds. “We can use the e-toll gantries for other things, such as traffic and speed monitoring. It’s unfortunate that the government did not think this through properly at the start. Now we will have to come up with another solution, such as 1c or 2c in the fuel levy, to pay for these roads. This will not be popular because the fuel price is already so high.”

De Freitas says he has tabled a private members’ bill in parliament that would force any future project of this nature to involve consultation with the provincial premier and city mayors, as well as members of the public, before being green-lighted. Sanral would also have to provide an alternative non-tolled route of decent quality.

Duvenage says national government, ETC and Sanral have indicated that they intend to summons every e-toll defaulter, a mind-boggling number probably well in excess of 1 million.

“This is a fight that government will never win in that it is virtually impossible to force this issue against the public at large. History shows that governments do not win battles of such magnitude of public dissent,” says Duvenage.

AUTHOR PROFILE

COMMENTS   23

To comment, you must be registered and logged in.

LOGIN HERE

Don't have an account?
Sign up for FREE

I wrote an article and it culminated in “When the government wants your money they will get it. Buy the stupid tag!” I have had one since inception. Since they opened all those money losing kiosks, in the malls.If this pans out those who fought the good fight may just lose.

If someone can give me one good reason why I must pay extra to drive on a 30 year old road network then I might consider paying e-tolls.
Even Alex van Niekerk couldn’t tell me what I’m paying for. When I said to him that nobody is getting anywhere any quicker than they were in 2007 and that nobody is paying any less for petrol, servicing or tyres (all things promised by Nazir Alli)he said that the GFIP is already close to its’ capacity.
So the improvements have lasted 8 years (2010 to 2018) and Sanral say that they cannot complete sections 2 and 3 of the GFIP without collecting tolls from section 1. But what is widening the road at OR Tambo going to help me sitting in a 3km queue trying to leave the highway at William Nicol or Allandale?
What that says to me is that the tolls aren’t meant to pay the outstanding debt but rather to pay for roads in other parts of Gauteng or SA.

It is just part of the looting that the anc continues to do.

Stealing is all they and their voters understand. That cannot do anything else. That is why they push for BEEEEEEEEE and AAAAAAAAAAA.

Tolloff, you are paying for the complete doubling-up of the GFIP network to 8 lanes (or more in some sections), if you missed it. If people like you have paid-up, then the other vital links would have been built by now. If, for instance the PWV 9 (i.e. parallel of Ben Schoeman)was built, then it would have released the pressures on William Nicol and Allandale. This example is applicable to most of the current network where new links will release traffic pressure and you would save time. Inter-urban toll networks, like this one, are commonplace in Europe, USA, etc. The one project in SA that was actually successfully delivered, are boikoted / sabotaged. Strange…

Except you didn’t fight the good fight.

You supported an system created by unlawful authorisations, built with unlawful disregard for environmental and planning laws, and policed with unlawful gantries which were and are in breach of metrology laws.

Your payments to SANRAL are school fees. The lesson is: insist your government obeys the law and the constitution next time.

There’s no logic in your comment, only surrender.

Good! For the first time in the history of post-democratic SA, white people are standing up for themselves. We have always been way too obedient and can learn a lot from our fellow South Africans when it comes to challenging unfair authority. Enough is enough.

Where did you get white from? I’m pretty sure people of all races in Gauteng have a similar opinion of SCUMRAIL and their eToll scam.

Etolls were plainly a corrupt deal from the start, intended to massively benefit a few ANC cadres. Unfortunately for them, an upsurge of public resistance arose unlike any previously seen in South Africa. The deal was done with overseas companies who were previously involved in corrupt dealings in the Arms saga. South Africans saw through the whole sorry mess, and have not co-operated – nor will they at this stage. ANC: keep up with you Sanral summonses and the ANC is guaranteed to lose further support in the next elections.

So, if a couple of cents per litre fuel levy would have paid for the roads by now (which it would) can’t we do the same and get rid of ALL toll gates in the country?

Was anyone ever convicted for not paying e tolls?

If I was sanral (and stay calm now…) I would only have one lane at each toll gate on N1 and N3 to Durban and Cape Town for ‘non e tags’. Then e tag users would go through quickly while the rest would que for an hour or more. Will be much more effective to encourage compliance via useless legal letters.

Who’s side are you on!!

Let the below be a lesson. We do not need to take all this nonsense from Govt. It is high time we stand up for what is right in this country and kick corruption in the nads

“This is a fight that government will never win in that it is virtually impossible to force this issue against the public at large. History shows that governments do not win battles of such magnitude of public dissent,” says Duvenage.

Really, and then would you also build a separate closed off lane for the entire 650kms to Durban for the eToll users? because the tailbacks from the Toll Gates would affect all the road users

It would also EFF the economy.

Except then SANRAL would have to explain the massive traffic jams which they claim – without evidence – toll roads reduce.

Another really, really dumb suggestion.

That was in reply to Japie M.

The epitome of the anc works, create a problem no body knew existed and hit the tax payers but exempt your taxi driving voters.

The explicit refusal by people to not pay Etolls is a middle finger to the elites and the anc.

Load All 23 Comments
End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

GO TO SHOP CART

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company:
server: 172.17.0.2