‘Too big to fail’ makes Eskom debt a good bet in low-yield world

Investors see big opportunity in the SOE’s bonds.
About 70% of Eskom’s R260 billion of bonds are guaranteed by the state. Picture: Bloomberg

South Africa’s pledge not to let Eskom fail is enticing yield-starved investors to the company’s dollar debt.

Bondholders from New York to Seoul say they’re happy to hold onto the power company’s securities — and in some cases add to their holdings — because of their extra return relative to the country’s sovereign debt. The government’s assurance that it won’t let the company default, effectively guaranteeing the debt, allows investors to play that spread without too much risk even though Eskom isn’t generating enough cash to service its own liabilities.

Read: Would you buy Eskom’s bonds?

“State support for the company remains very solid and they continue to prioritise the repayment of the company’s debt,” said Paul Greer, a London-based money manager at Fidelity International, which oversees 243 billion pounds ($295 billion), including Eskom bonds. “The valuations of Eskom debt remain on the cheap side of fair value.”

Yields on Eskom’s unsecured 2028 dollar bonds have dropped 250 basis points this year even after it reported a record loss in July. That’s still 250 basis points more than South Africa’s 10-year sovereign debt. The utility, which generates about 95% of the South Africa’s electricity, has amassed net debt of more than $30 billion and is relying on a R128 billion bailout over the next three fiscal years to stay afloat.

The government has proposed splitting Eskom into three operating units to help cut costs, but the plan is facing resistance from labor unions opposed to job losses. While President Cyril Ramaphosa has said Eskom is “too big to fail,” the government has had to increase borrowing too fund the bailout, raising the risk of a credit downgrade to junk.

“It ultimately comes down to government support,” said Jinwoo Kim, a credit analyst at Mirae Asset Global Investments in Seoul. “Ramaphosa is clearly expressing he would not give up on Eskom. Any investor holding Eskom bonds is seeing there is higher probability that the government will save the company, since the company is just too important for its economy.”

About 70% of Eskom’s R260 billion of bonds are guaranteed by the state. The rest are unsecured, but there’s too much at stake for the government to put bondholders in jeopardy, said Shamaila Khan, director of emerging-market debt at AllianceBernstein in New York, which holds Eskom bonds, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

‘Strong incentives’

“A key driver of performance going forward will be the restructuring proposal,” Khan said. While it’s not clear how that would affect bondholders, “the government has strong incentives to structure it in a way that it does not damage bondholder interests,” she said.

Not all investors are convinced. Eskom’s turnaround may still be a long way off given political sensitivities around the restructuring, said Guido Chamorro, co-head of emerging-market hard-currency debt at Pictet Asset Management in London, which reduced its holdings of Eskom debt in May, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

“We still hold some hope that the government will be able to address some of these issues, so we are ok having a neutral position,” Chamorro said. “But we haven’t seen enough signs to have conviction to move to a large overweight position.”

For others, though, it’s too good a deal to pass up. Fuh Hwa Investment Trust in Taiwan has recently accumulated Eskom bonds, betting there won’t be a debt restructuring even as the government reorganises the company’s operations.

“We know Eskom has lots of problems and inefficiencies, but we also know how important it is for the whole economy,” said Jasmine Wu, who oversees the emerging-market portfolio at Fuh Hwa. “So we don’t expect a restructuring of the debt and instead we believe the sovereign will do all it can to support Eskom, even if the result is a sovereign downgrade.”

© 2019 Bloomberg L.P.

Get access to Moneyweb's financial intelligence and support quality journalism for only
R63/month or R630/year.
Sign up here, cancel at any time.


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


Indeed, an attractive yield especially for foreign investors/funds…especially as (tax) non-residents their income tax doesn’t have to guarantee the bond.

For tax-resident Saffas it means your particular retirement fund may have great yields, but you (indirectly) pay for it through higher income tax in various forms. Do you really win overall.

Here’s the problem: even 15% per annum would have meant nothing in Zimbabwe after the year 2000. Even a 100% per annum means nothing when the economy is on the verge of collapsing. Two billion rands a day are fleeing SA. Why would this be? What do foreigners know?

Great empires have risen and fallen. Eskom will scarcely be a footnote in history. You either believe it’s too big to fail, or that they bigger they are…


Until the clever revolutionary masters in the ANC decide that they have conned these Investors out of enough cash, then they will be, conveniently, “forced” to withdraw their guarantees due to the negative impact it will have on our sovereignty.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: