Tshwane defies National Treasury (again)

Approves 18-year ICT contract.

The City of Tshwane approved a broadband project that will bind it for 18 years through a build, operate and transfer (BOT) contract to a newly-formed company, of which 41% of its shareholding is ‘still available’.

The project was approved by the city council last week despite serious concerns raised by both the Gauteng and national treasuries about, among other things, a flawed procurement process.

National Treasury told the city in a letter dated March 29 that the project should take the format of a public private partnership (PPP) and advised it to “void the tender and commence with the processes as outlined in the MSA (Municipal Systems Act), MFMA (Municipal Finance Management Act) and the PPP Regulations.

National Treasury has a special PPP unit and all municipal, provincial and national PPPs have to be registered with the unit and subjected to its prescribed and very rigorous procurement process. The development of the city’s new headquarters is currently underway as a PPP.

The city’s decision to proceed despite the objections comes against the background of its prepaid smart metering contract with PEU Capital – also concluded despite the strongest objections by finance minister Pravin Gordhan. Tshwane mayor Kgosientso Ramokgopa in May last year admitted that the city had in about eight months spent R830 million on the contract and it was unaffordable. He announced that the contract was cancelled and would come to an end in December, but it is currently still intact and millions of rands keep flowing to PEU daily.

In an email dated April 20, about a week before the project was approved by the council, Gauteng Treasury said: “… The City is clearly financing the project through the private sector and paying off the cost over the project term and hence the argument that the project does not represent a PPP does not convince us.”

It is clear from the correspondence that both the provincial and national treasuries had extensive interactions with the City of Tshwane and found the responses to their numerous concerns wanting.

Altech Alcom Matomo

The approval of the broadband project comes after Altech Alcom Matomo (PTY) Ltd, a division of Altech Radio Holding (PTY) Ltd, was appointed in June last year, following what the two treasuries consider to be a flawed tender process.

In terms of the award the project would be designed and built through a special purpose vehicle (SPV) currently named Newshelf 1327.

Newshelf was registered with the Companies and Intellectual Property Commission (CIPC) in August last year.

Responding to questions from Gauteng Treasury the City said the following about Newshelf under the heading ‘Funding’:

“Debt R1 billion (70%) (Absa, DBSA and IDC have all expressed interest in a portion of the debt) Equity: R430 million (30%) Absa has been appointed as sole lead arranger”.

It further says Altech Radio Holdings would have and maintain a 9% shareholding for five years. Cloudseed and New GX Capital Holdings would each have 25% and 41% is listed as ‘available’. The city adds that the SPV has received a lot of interest in the stake, and is currently shortlisting the interested parties. It would probably be a financial institution interested in infrastructure investment, the city says.

The city further said the SPV will have a small management team and is currently looking to find a CEO candidate. The EPC (engineering procurement and construction) and O&M (operations and maintenance) is contracted to Altech Radio Holdings, it says.

All the shareholders in the SPV will be required to give a standby equity guarantee, and further EPC and O&M performance guarantees would be required, the quantum of which will be confirmed by the lender’s technical advisor

In terms of the contract, the city has to pay an annual off-take amount of R278 million. The council approved that R152 million of its current ICT operational budget and R43 million from the capital budgets of the ICT, electricity and metro police departments be reprioritised for this purpose. The report stated that the city considers funding the R82 million shortfall with R40 million in 2016/17 and a further R42 million in 2017/18.

It is further envisaged that the city as ‘anchor tenant’ would receive 30% of the SPV’s profits from other clients using the network.

Moneyweb asked the city how much would be spent on the project in the current financial year, ending June 30. The response was: “The amounts payable are currently estimates and therefore will only be solid once detailed project plans have been agreed upon. All amounts due to service providers are payable upon invoicing and satisfaction by the city (as the client) as prescribed by service level agreement complementing the Municipal Finance Management Act, regulations and prescripts, the same applies in this instance.”  

In response to a question about the effect of the national and provincial treasuries’ objections to the project, the city said: “The Province and National Treasury has not objected to the project, they made comments and provided advisory on the project as required by our intergovernmental relations framework – The effect of such interactions (not objection as you suggest) is limited to the powers and functions of those spheres of government and equally, the powers and functions of the Municipality as a separate legal entity is prescribed by national, provincial and local by-laws.”

National Treasury has not yet responded to questions on the matter.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


And nothing gets done about it – again!
Its like an ANC chorus!

Tail wagging the dog – again!

I wonder what it takes to get a contract like this. Expertise? An excellent reputation ? Highly skilful and well documented track record? Trusted and respectable shareholders? I suspect none of the above. There is probably only one thing.

Surely Treasury can step in and cancel this deal? Tshwane council seem to have a track record and penchant for not following process and entering into questionable deals.

On face value this, just like the PEU transaction, appears to be a convenient vehicle to generate guaranteed cash flow for years to come for connected individuals or parties

As they say in the townships – ” its their turn to eat”- read steal.

I would like to know who is directors/stakeholders of this newly-formed company?

Perhaps this deal was secured very quickly and for a long period because the ANC think they may loose in the coming municipal elections, that way securing some form of income for selected people once the ANCV no longer have the control? Could that be possible and the motive?

So electricity and policing are going to be left short of funding it seems. Is ICT really that more important than basic services required in the poor areas where the voting fodder live? I’ll bet that the protesters against poor service deliveries do not have the faintest idea what their elected “saviours” are doing with the money which would be better spent delivering decent living conditions. Maybe opposition are not too interested in pointing this out because if they get in, it might affect how much they can “eat”.

Contract of 18 years? That’s very long and a lot can change in that time. They’ve probably provided for an annual increase of 10% at least to the contractor, irrespective of performance.

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: