You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App

NEW SENS search and JSE share prices

More about the app

Tshwane, Joburg consider Aarto withdrawal – Msimanga

But government set on rolling out ‘dysfunctional’ system.

The DA-led administrations in Tshwane and Johannesburg are discussing their possible withdrawal from the Administrative Adjudication of Road Traffic Offences (Aarto) pilot projects run within their jurisdiction, Tshwane mayor Solly Msimanga told journalists at a media briefing last week.

Msimanga said an announcement might follow soon.

The pilot projects have been in operation in both cities since 2007 and 2008 respectively, but are still plagued with problems. It has not been implemented anywhere else in the country, but the Department of Transport is still planning a countrywide roll-out. The implementation date has been postponed repeatedly in the past due to a lack of readiness.

Moneyweb has learnt that a meeting of the national Aarto task team with representatives from all provinces and local government is due to take place later this month in Bloemfontein in preparation for the planned countrywide roll-out.

Such a roll-out would see the implementation of demerit points for road infringers, with repeat offenders risking the suspension or even cancellation of their drivers’ licenses. The penalty points have not been implemented in the pilot projects.

The change in political leadership in Johannesburg and Tshwane after the municipal elections last year has placed the DA in a position to take unified action with regard to Aarto, as the party is in now charge of both metros.

In the past, the ANC-led councils were not prepared to take a stand against national government, although the pilot projects have seriously impacted the municipalities’ income from fines as well as traffic law enforcement.

This changed when officials from both Tshwane and Johannesburg told parliament in November last year that the system was not working. They asked for it to be suspended in their jurisdictions until the problems are addressed.

To this effect the parliamentary portfolio committee is currently dealing with proposed amendments to the act.

The two cities have since disclosed in their respective annual reports that the system cost them hundreds of millions of rands in the previous financial year ended June 30, 2016. Road users owe Tshwane R502 million, half of which has been outstanding for more than a year. Johannesburg has budgeted for an income from fines of R1.2 billion but collected only R294 million. The R718 million shortfall is blamed on the dysfunctional Aarto system.

In 2015/16 the Johannesburg metro police issued 5.3 million Aarto Infringement Notices and the Tshwane metro police 1.1 million.

One of the main problems is that unless the road users pay their fines within 30 days of it being issued, the metros are dependent on the Road Traffic Infringement Agency (RTIA) to take the process further. To do this, the RTIA should first issue a Courtesy Letter and if the road user still fails to respond an Enforcement Order is issued after prescribed time periods.

According to the RTIA 2015/16 Annual Report no Courtesy Letters were issued in the last three months of that year and no Enforcement Orders in the last seven months of that year.

That was due to a dispute with the Post Office. The Aarto Act requires that the notices be delivered by the Post Office using registered mail.

The RTIA’s failure to send out the notices within the timelines prescribed in the Aarto Act decreases the chances of issuing authorities like the Johannesburg and Tshwane metro police departments of ever collecting their fines. As a result, traffic law enforcement is rendered toothless and revenue is seriously impacted.

Some road users elect to state their cases in court, but no court cases were heard in Tshwane, while the 60 336 court hearings in Johannesburg delivered only 724 guilty findings on main charges. At the end of the financial year there were 49 628 cases pending.

The system also poses a huge risk for road users, especially fleet owners, says Cornelia van Niekerk, owner of Fines4U. Fines4U manages traffic fines and license renewals on behalf of more than 500 companies and 7 000 individual vehicles owners. These clients collectively own more than 30 000 vehicles.

Van Niekerk says a well-known construction company’s traffic fines average R70 000 per month and a motor dealer with five branches got fines to the value of R254 000 last month.

Business owners want credible information about the traffic fines issued to their drivers. They use it to discipline drivers where necessary and prefer to pay the fines where their employees acted unlawfully.

“Businesses want to be compliant, rather than risk having their vehicle licenses blocked and vehicles taken off the road as a result. If they have outstanding fines they further risk drivers being stopped on the road and unlawfully forced to pay on the spot,” she says.

Van Niekerk says the irony is that these clients want to pay, but the system makes it very difficult.

Vehicle owners often don’t know about outstanding fines due to issues with the delivery of notices through the Post Office. As a result they get nasty surprises and are then forced to pay large amounts with the proverbial gun against their heads.

She says Aarto can work if the traffic authorities were prepared to work with service providers like Fines4U who have systems that enable timeous delivery and management of traffic fines and license renewals. Instead the authorities are obstructive to such an extent that Fines4U has been forced to litigate on three different occasions. The company won two cases and is awaiting the third ruling.

Please consider contributing as little as R20 in appreciation of our quality independent financial journalism.



Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.


It seems like the ANC want a system where certain portions of the road users (like the taxis) can get away with murder )literally.

Is there anything of consequence that the anc has done that is not a C U F U ?

Sadly, the answer is a resounding NO.

“Johannesburg has budgeted for an income from fines of R1,2bn “. No further proof needed that traffic fines are nothing more than a revenue generation scheme. Not once is the safety of road users mentioned as a reason for changing the system.

Does it matter that the council earns income from the fines? What I can say is that after 2 months in Gauteng the roads scare me – the drivers have no respect for red lights etc. An efficient fining system will fix that as it did in Cape Town.

Kim – there is no effective policing of road rules so everybody sees stop streets and robots as at the very best yield signs. Fines won’t solve the problem – visible policing is the only answer

End of comments.





Follow us:

Search Articles: Advanced Search
Click a Company: