You are currently viewing our desktop site, do you want to download our app instead?
Moneyweb Android App Moneyweb iOS App Moneyweb Mobile Web App
Join our mailing list to receive top business news every weekday morning.

Court takes ex-minister to task over Telkom BEE status

Despite setting aside the minister’s decision, the high court said judgment would not affect Telkom’s B-BBEE status.
Because of a controversial 2019 decision by former trade & industry minister Rob Davies, any entity doing business with Telkom had to regard it as 100% black owned. Image: Moneyweb

The high court in Pretoria has overturned a controversial 2019 decision by former trade & industry minister Rob Davies that gave Telkom privileged black economic empowerment status by the government.

At the time, Davies agreed to give Telkom BEE ‘facilitator status’. The partially state-owned telecommunications operator welcomed the decision, saying it would boost its empowerment credentials and its competitiveness.

Specifically, Davies said in a notice dated April 5, 2019, and published in the Government Gazette of May 7, 2019, that he granted the final approval for the facilitator status to the “government of South Africa, represented by the office of the presidency, for the full shares of 40.5% held in Telkom”. The status was granted for a period of 10 years, or until April 5, 2029. It’s not clear why the status was granted to government and not Telkom directly.

But the high court has now overturned Davies’ decision, handing victory to Altron, which brought the application against the minister, and to MTN South Africa, which filed to join Altron as a co-applicant. The court ordered Davies, Telkom and subsidiary BCX to pay the legal costs of both Altron and MTN, including the costs of two counsel in each case.

The judgment was handed down on June 8, 2020, but has not been reported in the media until now.

The amended B-BBEE codes of good practice empower the trade & industry minister to designate certain organs of state or public entities as B-BBEE facilitators. This meant, until the judgment against Davies, that any entity doing business with Telkom was required to regard the company as 100% black owned.

‘Not a public entity’

Following the publication of Davies’ decision on Telkom, Altron sought a “declarator” that Telkom is not under the “ownership control” of the government and is not a “public entity” in terms of the Public Finance Management Act. Alternatively, Altron wanted the court to state that Telkom is an inappropriate public entity for the purposes of being granted B-BBEE facilitator status in terms of the ICT sector codes.

Altron said Davies’ decision — or the process leading to it — was “procedurally unfair and irrational; the minister failed to furnish reasons for the decision; and the decision was substantively unreasonable, irrational and unlawful”.

It said the relevant empowerment legislation obliges the minister — before he issues, replaces or amends a BEE code of good practice — to publish the draft code or amendment in the Government Gazette for public comment and to grant interested persons a period of at least 60 days to comment.

“The notice published by Davies concerned the application of Telkom for B-BBEE facilitator status. No such application was ever made. An application was cobbled together by the department of trade & industry; the BEE chief directorate requested the designation; the director-general recommended the designation to the minister; and the minister approved the designation. The department of trade & industry was both the applicant and a participant in the decision-making process.

“There is a material difference between the decision proposed in the notice and the decision which was made. The notice suggested a decision would be made to grant Telkom facilitator status whereas the final approval granted facilitator status to the government of South Africa represented by the office of the presidency. This difference materially impacts upon what was proposed to be done, what the public perceived was proposed to be done, and what the public was invited to comment upon.”

Despite setting aside the minister’s decision, the high court said judgment would not affect Telkom’s B-BBEE status, nor those of its subsidiary companies, for the purposes of any tender or contract awarded or concluded after 7 May 2019 and prior to the date of the order (8 June 2020).

Chris Potgieter, Altron executive for legal services, welcomed the judgment. He said Davies’ decision to grant BEE facilitator status to Telkom meant that BCX would benefit in terms of its own BEE rating. “That placed all the other competitors at a disadvantage,” Potgieter said. “We felt that was unfair and was never the intention of the BEE legislation…”

He said the process followed by Davies was “totally flawed”. Specifically, there was “major criticism about the procedural aspects. People shouldn’t ride roughshod over proper administrative procedures. We felt we had to take a stand.”

Telkom spokeswoman Noma Faku said her company would not seek to appeal the judgment. – © 2020 NewsCentral Media

Duncan McLeod is editor of TechCentral.

This article was first published on TechCentral here.

AUTHOR PROFILE

Get full access to 's financial insights and support quality journalism.

Only R63 per month or R630 per year. You can cancel at any time.

COMMENTS   7

Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in to comment.

SIGN IN SIGN UP

“The partially state-owned telecommunications operator welcomed the decision, saying it would boost its empowerment credentials and its competitiveness.”

Only in South Africa the government interference capital of the world.

Normally competitiveness depends on having excellent products and service at a price the market can bear.

That’s what happens when you create a false economy by forcing destructive laws into place.

BEE laws are destructive and our economy has been hollowed out by ANC affiliates with whom businesses are forced to trade based on the colour of these skin.

Has there ever been a more racist economy than current SA anywhere in the world?

former trade & industry minister Rob Davies was the wrong guy to lead the Dti.

instead of making industry more competitive, Davies bet on protecting industry did nothing but make it less competitive… explains why our industry is not resilient enough in the face of covid19

Even more the reason to sunset BEE immediately.

Rob Davies is a Communist – that party that has been totally outed by history as a destroyer of nations (Google list of ‘Former Communist States – there are 30 of them, plus ‘FORMER multi-party states with governing communist parties’ – 50 of those). The only truly Communist country today is North Korea – the most repressive nation in the world, with its people starving. So why the hell do we have people who subscribe to a patently-failed ideology running the show in South Africa? Can voters not see that the Communists/Socialists in the ANC will not ‘do it differently here’as they sometimes claim. The very ideology destroys the human initiative that has seen countries like West Germany rise from the ashes (even after staggering to absorb former Communist E.Germany’s abject poverty). Voter ignorance is simply staggering.

And don’t forget dear old Pravin who is hell bent on rescueing SAA, no matter how unfeasible it is. Strange how these commies, at the same time all enjoy living it up in a democratic society whilst in essence showing the poor a middle finger!

There are none so blind …..

End of comments.

LATEST CURRENCIES  

USD / ZAR
GBP / ZAR
EUR / ZAR

Podcasts

NEWSLETTERS WEB APP SHOP PORTFOLIO TOOL TRENDING CPD HUB

Follow us:

Search Articles:Advanced Search
Click a Company: