Can you be evicted from a life rights retirement village for non-payment of levies?

Firstly, interest will be charged on the overdue amount, then services may be disconnected or discontinued, then legal proceedings may be instituted. It is ultimately preferable to avoid getting into arrears.

I have bought into a life rights retirement village. My understanding is that you are guaranteed a place to live for life and the property is owned by the developer. We pay a monthly levy that increases every year. What would happen if the tenant at some stage cannot pay the monthly levies anymore? Can the developer evict the tenant, or would the levy cost be deducted from the cost of the house when it is eventually sold with the seller obviously receiving less for the sale of the house? My biggest concern is that the developer evicts the tenant for non-payment of levies. Has the developer got the right to do so?

  Profile      Follow      Mail

Firstly, thank you for your question about life rights levies. Life rights schemes are growing in popularity in South Africa because they offer a cost-effective and less onerous option for retirees. A life rights scheme involves purchasing the right to use the unit for the remainder of one’s life. In the case of couples, the right to use the unit ceases upon the death of the second spouse or partner and, importantly, this right is an inalienable one.

Security of tenure forms the foundation of a life right, and the inalienability of this right must be guaranteed in your life right contract.

Life rights are regulated in terms of the Housing Development Schemes for Retirement Persons Act 65 of 1988 (HDSRP), and the terms of your life rights contract are extremely important, including what happens in the event that a life rights holder fails to pay their levies. Before buying into a life rights complex, it is therefore important to ensure that the contract complies with the HDSRP Act and that it sets out all limitations and rules that apply to the life rights holder.

In terms of the act, provision is made for the eventuality that a life rights holder fails to pay their levies

Firstly, interest at a rate determined by the body corporate from time to time will be charged on the overdue levies, with this interest accruing from the date that the levy falls due to the date that the levy is paid.

Where a life rights holder fails to pay levies and interest owing, the body corporate should give the member reasonable time in which to remedy the matter. If the member still fails to pay, the body corporate has the right to disconnect and/or discontinue services to the member’s unit and refuse the member access to the complex’s communal facilities. The body corporate may also institute legal proceedings against the member, with the member being liable for legal costs and penalties.

Unlike sectional title levies which are set on an annual basis, life rights levies and administration costs are generally lower and much more transparent.

Further, life rights developers are obliged by law to provide a two-year cost estimate in respect of levies, making it easier for retirees to manage their cash flow into the future.

This means that budgeting in advance for your levies should be more cost-effective and manageable and, if you’re managing your retirement income carefully, you should not find yourself in a position where your levies are in arrears.

That said, life rights contracts can be long, complex and difficult to understand, and it is always advisable to see advice from an experienced property attorney before signing the contract so that you fully understand what your legal position will be if you run into future financial difficulties.

In addition, we recommend that you consult with a qualified, independent financial advisor who can prepare cash flow forecasts for you to ensure that you can afford the costs of your life rights unit going forward.

Was this answer by Gareth helpful?


Sort by:
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Top voted

You must be signed in and an Insider Gold subscriber to comment.


Just pay your flippen levies. That is all.

But they have invested their surplus funds with the Cajee brothers and are exploring their options

I struggle to understand the concept of buying a property and then having to pay a levy, indefinitely. Sure, you always get the story about amenities available, gardening services being supplied, security, etc, but none of the calculations I’ve made, makes financial sense. For instance; you buy a house on a golf course for R4.5m and then you have to pay R7500 pm levy, which does not include golf membership, use of the gym, or even a meal in the restaurant. If you use any of those, you pay for it over and above. So, what is the levy for? Availability? The nice entrance gate? The same applies to retirement villages. You go to the intensive care unit, you pay through your ears. You use the laundry option, you pay for it. You use the nurse, you pay for it. Honestly, what is the attraction of such a setup? Doesn’t it make more sense to own a freestanding property, where the levy is R0? Why pay for the availability of a list of ‘amenities’, when they are already available in most decent-sized towns, without having to pay a levy? In my view this concept was so well marketed that nobody questions it anymore, but it surely is non-sensical.

It’s for the walls, the electric fence, the security guards and the maintenance of roads/walls.

People pay a lot for feeling more secure in a complex/estate. In JHB especially certain suburbs that were fine to be in a free standing house are no longer safe, or no longer perceived to be safe.

I’d also take an estate over living on a farm/small holding in parts of the country.

Also property rates, sewerage, refuse removal, property insurance, admin, etc.

Didnt see an answer in terms of not being able to pay. It just spoke about rollup and non use of some services and extension periods.

What happens if they cant pay? You defer and roll up for 10 years and then? I can only assume in such a severe poverty case it’s extinguished on death and the village takes the knock?

I wouldn’t make that assumption. If the body corporate is entitled to institute legal proceedings to recover the arrears, with costs, that implies a remedy ? I don’t know if a court would order a sale, but.

no, but the answer here seems to have given a long explanation to basically say, “I don’t know”?

End of comments.




Instrument Details  

You do not have any portfolios, please create one here.
You do not have an alert portfolio, please create one here.

Follow us:

Search Articles:
Click a Company: